Free: Contests & Raffles.
I'd probably even buy a discover pass and start using the State Parks again if this passes. I'm fine with pay to play. The main reason I haven't and won't is out of spite...
Quote from: walt on January 17, 2013, 09:37:35 AMI'd probably even buy a discover pass and start using the State Parks again if this passes. I'm fine with pay to play. The main reason I haven't and won't is out of spite...I think that sentiment is probably shared by many hunters, and thus there would be some additional revenues that may not be considered should this occur. It's a slap in the face to hunters to have to pay twice.
What's the logic on believing we should still have to pay to use state parks?
This IS going to be an uphill battle 1) there is currently only one sponsor to this bill, usually the more sponsors the better the chance the bill has of passing 2) there is going to be a significant amount of loss revenue, where are they going to make that up at?