When 'THEY' come for your guns, what are you really going to do?

[csaaphill]

Don't be surprised with the plethra of legislation being thrown out there and from what I heard from the legislatures in California saying this is a helath and safety issue don't be surprised if surprise inspections come at some time. Who what or where who know yet but don't be surprised. OSHA maybe FEMA who knows.

[hillbilli]

If the swat team comes to your house.. and the family would be in the line of fire, and you smile and nod and hand over the gun you have there.. or if they come when you arent home and take the guns you have there in the house.. does anyone really think their duty to support and defend becomes any less at that point? or that their personal fight should end instead of begin there?   I remember in high school seeing someone paid to beat someone else up.. who should he have gone after? Big Ed who was paid to kick his ass or the guy who sent Big Ed after him? I am not of course endorsing any particular line of action, but I am saying that a lot of the logical reason and preparation for worse case scenarios is best worked out before hand. Think about these things, and figure out who you can trust now..

[csaaphill]

i'd hope the wife shoots back
they take while i'm gone guess law abiding just shot through the roof.
Both.
 

[Simcoe hunter]

Sadly, I no longer own guns.  Seeing this coming I have sold them for the amount I wanted instead of whatever the government will offer when they take them.  I am returning to strictly archery.

[BowForElk]

Don't be surprised with the plethra of legislation being thrown out there and from what I heard from the legislatures in California saying this is a helath and safety issue don't be surprised if surprise inspections come at some time. Who what or where who know yet but don't be surprised. OSHA maybe FEMA who knows.

                                "***WARNING***
AR15's are known to cause cancer in the state of California" 

[csaaphill]

Guess those things will iron themselves out.
Was thinking on that too, don't think if you don't know now you probably wont then.
Actually with all i've seen coming and trying to get passed I'm beginging to think things are going to heat up worse.

[csaaphill]

Really though I have sworn to answer a call to arms. If it don't come to that or some other thing happens and I don't get that chance well who knows.

[longstevo]

Agreed to almost all points. 

When the black suits come, loading up and shooting back isn't going to lead to anything except bad news for the gun owner.  It'll essentially be a choice of 'hand them over or go to prison.' 

But when its reported that all the guns were either 'sold' or 'lost,' that information will be reported as Mr. X's house is clear of all firearms.  Then when Mr. X's house is burglarized, and he uses a firearm to defend his family, the police will come and discover that Mr. X possessed illegal firearms, and then he'll be the one in prison.  It happened in Britain to a gentleman who is still currently in prison for defending himself during a break in with a shotgun and killed the suspect. 

[csaaphill]

Agreed to almost all points. 

When the black suits come, loading up and shooting back isn't going to lead to anything except bad news for the gun owner.  It'll essentially be a choice of 'hand them over or go to prison.' 

But when its reported that all the guns were either 'sold' or 'lost,' that information will be reported as Mr. X's house is clear of all firearms.  Then when Mr. X's house is burglarized, and he uses a firearm to defend his family, the police will come and discover that Mr. X possessed illegal firearms, and then he'll be the one in prison.  It happened in Britain to a gentleman who is still currently in prison for defending himself during a break in with a shotgun and killed the suspect.

thats whay you don't let someone stand alone on this come running prewarning can go along ways too.

[csaaphill]

partially true though that's why I don't like the I lost em. does nothing too.
prewarning though could go a long way and 2 or more stand together like stacks of paper has force.
one piece of paper alone does nothing but many pieces together holds.

[pens fan]

I made a thread about who is our enemy. The enemy is who is actually wanting this to happen. The aiders and abetters.

[BowForElk]

Agreed to almost all points. 

When the black suits come, loading up and shooting back isn't going to lead to anything except bad news for the gun owner.  It'll essentially be a choice of 'hand them over or go to prison.' 

But when its reported that all the guns were either 'sold' or 'lost,' that information will be reported as Mr. X's house is clear of all firearms.  Then when Mr. X's house is burglarized, and he uses a firearm to defend his family, the police will come and discover that Mr. X possessed illegal firearms, and then he'll be the one in prison.  It happened in Britain to a gentleman who is still currently in prison for defending himself during a break in with a shotgun and killed the suspect.

This is the way I look at it. They are gonna come to my door (maybe assuming they break through the gate) and ask to come inside and I say no. They don't have a warrant cause they don't have probable cause so they don't come in. I close the door and the first person that helps themselves through my door is getting shot. Period. At that point you're the same as a burglar in my book.

[Mudman]

Listen if they did come door to door there isnt alot we could do without endangering our family and such.  Truth.  Many will give em up to protect their kids.  Many wont.  The trick will be to hide em till they leave. Gorilla warfare will be most productive to our cause.  Witholding our $ will be another way.  If Obama signs this uN treaty I think UN can come for our guns and it supercedes our Const. rights.  This would explain the weapon stockpiles DHS is gathering.  HMMMM?  The best thing to do will be to hide em.

[Simcoe hunter]

http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Articles/Treaties.htm

Interesting commentary on treaties.

[Mudman]

I understand this.  With a Liberal court in place this could easily be challenged.  It is open for interpretation.  Much like Obamacare.