collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds  (Read 10619 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9152
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2013, 05:27:57 PM »
What do you bet all these horrible cuts will take place and for the most part you won't even notice it?
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2013, 07:13:28 PM »
Thats kinda what Ive been wondering?
MAGA!  Again..

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2013, 07:21:19 PM »
I've never seen an actual reduction of current spending, only reductions in increased spending.

Are these cuts actual cuts in spending or cuts in increased spending?
Actual cuts in spending.
Thats not true, they are proposed cuts in increased spending over the next five years.

Its all fear mongering and it was Obama's idea from the get go.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10659
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2013, 10:46:53 PM »
PR and DJ funds are dedicated.  Don't quite understand where they get off thinking they can manipulate those fund sources other than if tax revenues from sales are down, then so would be the allocation of those funds to respective states, or vise versa.

Don't think politicans can write a law diverting funds?

Remember the 2 years when NOVA funds (ATV/ORV) were used to fund state parks. NOVA funds were "dedicated" to ATV/ORV funding....

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10659
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #34 on: February 25, 2013, 10:48:24 PM »
I've never seen an actual reduction of current spending, only reductions in increased spending.

Are these cuts actual cuts in spending or cuts in increased spending?
Actual cuts in spending.
Thats not true, they are proposed cuts in increased spending over the next five years.

Its all fear mongering and it was Obama's idea from the get go.

Thats false.

Then why would many federal employees already be getting furlough notices?? If your statement were true then only new positions would be eliminated/stopped. Not currently funded positions as are already being impacted.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #35 on: February 25, 2013, 10:55:10 PM »
I've never seen an actual reduction of current spending, only reductions in increased spending.

Are these cuts actual cuts in spending or cuts in increased spending?
Actual cuts in spending.
Thats not true, they are proposed cuts in increased spending over the next five years.

Its all fear mongering and it was Obama's idea from the get go.

Thats false.

Then why would many federal employees already be getting furlough notices?? If your statement were true then only new positions would be eliminated/stopped. Not currently funded positions as are already being impacted.
Better do a little more research Tex. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #36 on: February 27, 2013, 09:43:08 AM »
I'm sorry, but having worked at both a National Park and at a Forest Service, I have no pitty on cutting especially for the Nat. Park Service.  They claim they have to "close" land because there are not enough law enforcement (aka babysitters).  When I was in back country the NPS had to have rangers stationed at certain lakes and areas 24-7 to monitor permits.  All the while, the USFS with similar lakes next door maybe cleaned the trail once every few years.  Much less money spent, same recreation.  USFish and Wildlife is even worse with their micormanagment of recreation.  I'd just hand all that over to the states.

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8886
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #37 on: February 27, 2013, 09:51:16 AM »
Then why would many federal employees already be getting furlough notices?? If your statement were true then only new positions would be eliminated/stopped. Not currently funded positions as are already being impacted.

To further the fear?

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45375
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #38 on: February 27, 2013, 11:17:56 AM »
Pittman Robertson Funds can only be used for conservation and hunter education. Those funds can't be thrown in the general fund by law.

I have no problem with across-the-board cuts. We need more of them by about 5 or 6 times the present cuts.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10659
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #39 on: February 27, 2013, 11:21:09 AM »
Pittman Robertson Funds can only be used for conservation and hunter education. Those funds can't be thrown in the general fund by law.

Congress can temporarily divert funds anytime. Happens in WA all the time. Congress can also delay dispursing the funds.

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #40 on: February 27, 2013, 11:43:19 AM »
They do wharever the H___  they want!  Why cant people see that? Make up a reason or law and off they go!  "Those funds cant be thrown in general fund."  I know its not right but they dont follow their laws.  Feds dont even have a budget yet in congress!  Corruption at a high Chicago level.
MAGA!  Again..

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2819
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: $685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #41 on: February 27, 2013, 07:35:38 PM »
We need to stop spending money that we don't have.  We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.  We also spend money on things that are unnecessary.
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline wackmaster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 760
  • Location: Selah Wa.
$685 Million to be Cut from Federal Wildlife and Public Lands Funds
« Reply #42 on: March 02, 2013, 08:50:24 AM »
At least we have the discover pass
Get outdoors and enjoy life

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:34:18 AM]


Such cool looking animals by 2MANY
[Today at 11:28:44 AM]


Big old and heavy by SkookumHntr
[Today at 11:19:28 AM]


Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming by JDHasty
[Today at 10:48:41 AM]


Newbie quail hunter by salt n sage90
[Today at 10:46:32 AM]


Where should i hunt turkeys? Can anyone help? by birddogdad
[Today at 09:26:59 AM]


Hunting by Republic/Ferry county by mikey549
[Today at 09:25:05 AM]


Any buck clarification by 92xj
[Today at 08:38:04 AM]


LINCOLN !! by metlhead
[Today at 07:34:04 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by redi
[Today at 05:44:19 AM]


mushroom id on a hemlock by Timberstalker
[Today at 04:58:28 AM]


Grizzly? by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 11:22:50 PM]


2025 Quality Tag Hunt. 💥VIDEO 💥 by Transam2340
[Yesterday at 09:23:59 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Born2late
[Yesterday at 08:29:55 PM]


More special privileges by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 07:50:37 PM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by dreadi
[Yesterday at 07:17:18 PM]


GMU 111 antlered moose advice request by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 05:59:14 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by OutHouse
[Yesterday at 03:49:36 PM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by kball4
[Yesterday at 02:17:00 PM]


Spur of the moment hunt by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 11:30:38 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal