Free: Contests & Raffles.
I would totally agree. if you could find a 70-200 l f4 for $500.00I paid half that for my 70-300 4-5.6 is USMI would rather have the L, lol
I would totally agree. if you could find a 70-200 l f4 for $500.00I paid half that for my 70-300 4-5.6 is USM
Quote from: Alchase on February 21, 2013, 11:35:20 AMI would totally agree. if you could find a 70-200 l f4 for $500.00I paid half that for my 70-300 4-5.6 is USM$500 actually seems a bit high. I sold mine a couple years ago for $425, and it was in excellent condition. They frequently go for anywhere between $425 and $500 on POTN. Craigslist prices are often way out of line.
Did a quick search on POTN for the 70-200 f4 non-IS:Grandpaw already showed you a link for one that is still available there for $500One sold last week for $475There's another one currently available for $500Another one sold on eBay for $500 last week (listed on POTN too)Another is currently available for $490I did not see any for sale where the seller was asking for more than $500I'm just trying to make a point that there's no need to pay more than $500 just because somebody on Craigslist is being selfish or greedy.
A buddy of mine scored big time at Best Buy last week. While browsing through the camera section, there was a box with a hand written price tag of $1200.00 He turned it over and it said it was a return with full warranty, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM He bought it, brought it home, and when he opened the box there was a EF 70-200mm f/4L USM in the box, not a EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM.He took it back to Best Buy, and the return guy agreed, they ordered him a new lens. He picked up his brand new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM on Friday. They called when it came in so he took the day off to play with it.Some people have all the luck