Free: Contests & Raffles.
One point about not having hounds chase bear, is that as a hunter without dogs, I feel like I may have a better chance on foot. I am not studied with numbers regarding success rates or saturation of bear, but I just feel like I have a better chance without the hound hunters in the woods. This is just an opinion. On the other hand, as stated often here, we need to circle the wagons together on hunting issues. You help me, I help you. Our enemy on this one, and other issues like it, is the non-hunting public. Somehow, we need to convince them to support our causes....
Quote from: JoshT on September 30, 2008, 02:54:02 PMWhatever... to each their own... Josh, I'll agree with you on the "to each their own" part. People like you is the reason why the stupid initiative passed. If you don't want to hunt a certain way then don't. But hunting with hounds and baiting bears were two great ways for harvesting bears and many people liked doing it.I couldn't understand all those people voting for the ban.................just because they didn't want to hunt that way why should they restrict others from it?
Whatever... to each their own...