Free: Contests & Raffles.
I was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the Mule Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organization.
Quote from: bobcat on March 20, 2013, 11:08:27 PMI was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the MuLe Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organization.He claimed they had their palms out. I don't think it went to there salary's. and they to are owners of the critters also! I am not sure, but I'm sure there are some moose and goose employee's on this site that will tell you were the money went. I believe it went back into enforcement or reward money for whistle blowing sportspeople. My point is he did a stand up thing to make up for a bad. He had 40 years to get away with it and now some people don't think how he tried to fix it is good enough! In addition... if you poach White tale why should you give the money to the dang Mule boy's..
I was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the MuLe Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organization.
Quote from: bobcat on March 20, 2013, 11:08:27 PMI was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the Mule Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organizationDonations go into the Fish and Wildlife Enforcement Account which helps fund WDFW investigations and provide rewards for poaching tips. This is the same account where the "criminal wildlife penalty assessment" funds go into when someone illegally kills big game or protected wildlife.
I was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the Mule Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organization
Quote from: bigtex on March 20, 2013, 11:20:14 PMQuote from: bobcat on March 20, 2013, 11:08:27 PMI was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the Mule Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organizationDonations go into the Fish and Wildlife Enforcement Account which helps fund WDFW investigations and provide rewards for poaching tips. This is the same account where the "criminal wildlife penalty assessment" funds go into when someone illegally kills big game or protected wildlife.Proof?
Quote from: Smossy on March 20, 2013, 11:23:18 PMQuote from: bigtex on March 20, 2013, 11:20:14 PMQuote from: bobcat on March 20, 2013, 11:08:27 PMI was thinking the same thing as KFhunter. Just seems like giving the money to the WDFW is like throwing it away. I think the WDFW should not have accepted it. Perhaps they could have suggested he donate it to the Mule Deer Foundation, or some other worthy pro-hunting organizationDonations go into the Fish and Wildlife Enforcement Account which helps fund WDFW investigations and provide rewards for poaching tips. This is the same account where the "criminal wildlife penalty assessment" funds go into when someone illegally kills big game or protected wildlife.Proof? That's how it works.RCW 77.15.425Fish and wildlife enforcement reward account. The fish and wildlife enforcement reward account is created in the custody of the state treasurer. Deposits to the account include: Receipts from fish and shellfish overages as a result of a department enforcement action;....... The department may accept money or personal property from persons under conditions requiring the property or money to be used consistent with the intent of expenditures from the fish and wildlife enforcement reward account.
Quote from: Alan K on March 20, 2013, 05:20:47 PMSad thing is, if it were more recent they'd probably revoke his hunting rights. I've heard multiple stories of guys hitting cows by accident, or shooting a two point buck swearing it had three points. . . They tried doing the right thing and calling it in so that someone could utilize the meat, and they got the book thrown at them just as though they'd been a serial poacher for 50 years. I've also heard that the penalty is the penalty, so leniency is out of the question even if enforcement wanted to go easy on them. And maybe there was more to the stories than what you've heard
Sad thing is, if it were more recent they'd probably revoke his hunting rights. I've heard multiple stories of guys hitting cows by accident, or shooting a two point buck swearing it had three points. . . They tried doing the right thing and calling it in so that someone could utilize the meat, and they got the book thrown at them just as though they'd been a serial poacher for 50 years. I've also heard that the penalty is the penalty, so leniency is out of the question even if enforcement wanted to go easy on them.
Pretty cool story, but have to admit, if he did it back then to feed his family, I hold nothing against him whether he sent the check in or not.
I wonder if he knew that the statue of limitations had ran out? Still a great jester for a 40 year old crime.. I don't think the fine would of been that back then.