collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Mudflow access  (Read 9025 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Mudflow access
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2013, 06:59:55 PM »
When you enter WDFW lands after hours or during a closed time of the year you are almost always charged for:

RCW 77.15.230 WAC 232-13-050.3

The above RCW states "(1) A person is guilty of unlawful use of department lands or facilities if the person enters upon, uses, or remains upon department-owned or department-controlled lands or facilities in violation of any rule of the department."

The WAC states it is illegal to violate a posted sign on WDFW lands, such as a no access sign or a sign saying open during daylight hours only.

It is essentially WDFW lands form of trespass.

Offline RClare1223

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 214
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Mudflow access
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2013, 07:33:52 PM »
Im not saying im gonna go in there before it opens i just say dont post that you will get points for turning someone in when you wont. Thats not what the point reward system is for.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3493
  • Location: west coast
Re: Mudflow access
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2013, 08:06:24 PM »
Im not saying im gonna go in there before it opens i just say dont post that you will get points for turning someone in when you wont. Thats not what the point reward system is for.

if its just a trespass violation why do gamies act like its murder ?? i hear/witness stories every year of gamies gone csi doing their best to prove everyone up there is making tracks on the mudflow.. idk if they just know they can maybe catch people  (they dont catch that many) or what but i see more gamies on 504 this time of year than any other..i feel like it would be easier to poach a big bull than it would be to snag alil ol shed  :dunno:

idk i guess i just cant get over the idea that tax $ is being spent more to protect dead bone than it is the elk themselves...yes i know its for the "health of the starving wintering elk" but..they dont care about all the other elk a few hundred yards north or south ?? a mile or two west ?? what about those elk ?? hmmmm wait they dont make tourist dollars off those elk so who cares right ?? ohh wait..these are the same elk they are going to let wolves one day eat ?? mhmmm...that makes sense

if they really want to protect the elk make that boundry alot bigger...so people wont even be tempted to go onto the flow

sorry..had to get that off my chest

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Today at 02:10:11 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal