Free: Contests & Raffles.
QuotePictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...Okay, so those will be included in the same zone as the Wenatchee, Teanaway, and Lookout packs (North Central.)What I'm more interested in is confirmation of wolves on the west side, that are within the south cascades/northwest coastal zone.
Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...
No wolves need to be on the Peninsula or even the westside of the southern cascades for delisting. If I get a chance I'll pull up the .pdf of the wolf plan and quote the verbiage.
Quote from: NWWABOWHNTR on March 28, 2013, 04:19:41 PMQuote from: bobcat on March 28, 2013, 04:15:14 PMQuote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. I just re-sent them to region 4 a few days ago... this biologist I sent them to I trust. He never seen them the first time I sent them. ANswer to your question, no feedback to me other than probable hybrids. Again, where is the proof?Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...This one of them?http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=79244.0;attach=151798;imageDid they ever even bother to find these when you last reported them?
Quote from: bobcat on March 28, 2013, 04:15:14 PMQuote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. I just re-sent them to region 4 a few days ago... this biologist I sent them to I trust. He never seen them the first time I sent them. ANswer to your question, no feedback to me other than probable hybrids. Again, where is the proof?Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...
Quote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. I just re-sent them to region 4 a few days ago... this biologist I sent them to I trust. He never seen them the first time I sent them. ANswer to your question, no feedback to me other than probable hybrids. Again, where is the proof?
Quote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist.
There are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist.
what is a pack concidered? i know the clockum elk herd, blue mt elk herd and other regions is not one herd all the elk running together? so could there be 5 different packs that they consider one pack?
Quote from: cougarbart on March 28, 2013, 04:51:23 PMwhat is a pack concidered? i know the clockum elk herd, blue mt elk herd and other regions is not one herd all the elk running together? so could there be 5 different packs that they consider one pack?A breeding pair. Male and female and their offspring (if any).
Quote from: Kola16 on March 28, 2013, 04:56:03 PMQuote from: cougarbart on March 28, 2013, 04:51:23 PMwhat is a pack concidered? i know the clockum elk herd, blue mt elk herd and other regions is not one herd all the elk running together? so could there be 5 different packs that they consider one pack?A breeding pair. Male and female and their offspring (if any).There can be a pack without a BP.
Quote from: NWWABOWHNTR on March 28, 2013, 04:19:41 PMQuote from: bobcat on March 28, 2013, 04:15:14 PMQuote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. Again, where is the proof?Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...This one of them?http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=79244.0;attach=151798;imageDid they ever even bother to find these when you last reported them?
Quote from: bobcat on March 28, 2013, 04:15:14 PMQuote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. Again, where is the proof?Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...
Quote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. Again, where is the proof?
So, assuming this is a wolf kill (which is highly likely), is the bio:a) dumbb) A liarc) some other option If he is lying, then is he lying so that WDFW doesn't have to pay the rancher for his losses? Or does he just love wolves so much that he doesn't want to admit that it was a wolf kill? hmm....