collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: % for spring bear harvests  (Read 13188 times)

Offline Jerome

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 522
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2013, 11:37:47 AM »
There were more than 1 taken out of Monroe last spring. 

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2013, 11:45:17 AM »
Harvest reports only show 1

Offline Jerome

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 522
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2013, 11:48:54 AM »
That's for 2011.

Offline Jerome

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 522
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2013, 11:51:32 AM »
Also I wouldn't rely on those being accurate.

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2013, 09:39:24 AM »
20 out of 25 permits were reported and still only one bear doesn't seem to be doing anything to protect tree loss.  Seems more like a money maker for the state than a management tool.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2013, 09:41:01 AM »
They should let spring bear tag holders bait.

Overall....I think what has already been said is correct. More time in the field will obviously get better results. Also, having some buddies that help is a huge advantage.

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2013, 09:44:08 AM »
Baiting would be cool and a more effective management tool but it will never happen.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2013, 09:44:59 AM »
Agreed

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39199
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2013, 09:54:37 AM »
This is why I don't understand why they don't have spring bear permits in more units, actually in ALL units that have a reasonably good population of bears. Success rates will be low anyway, and more units and more permits available would equal more applications, and therefore more money for the state. And of course, more opportunity for hunters, which isn't that what the WDFW is all about- providing lots of hunting opportunity with little chance for success?

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2013, 10:51:37 AM »
This is why I don't understand why they don't have spring bear permits in more units, actually in ALL units that have a reasonably good population of bears. Success rates will be low anyway, and more units and more permits available would equal more applications, and therefore more money for the state. And of course, more opportunity for hunters, which isn't that what the WDFW is all about- providing lots of hunting opportunity with little chance for success?
I agree with you but those biologist are smarter than us I guess.

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1833
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #25 on: April 01, 2013, 11:15:17 AM »
Yes. The biologists are the ones making all of the decisions... :dunno: Most of the biologists are guys like most of us. They love the outdoors and therefore they've dedicated their lives to working in and protecting our resources.
It is hard to follow one great vision in a world of darkness and of many changing shadows. Among these shadows men get lost.
-Black Elk

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #26 on: April 01, 2013, 11:21:40 AM »
I guess I really wasn't trying to take a shot at the biologist.  Maybe it should have been the wdfw as a whole.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39199
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2013, 11:26:59 AM »
I don't think biologists have much to do with setting seasons and regulations. It seems to be based more on politics than science to me. But I could be wrong.   :dunno:

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1833
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #28 on: April 01, 2013, 11:29:20 AM »
I don't think biologists have much to do with setting seasons and regulations. It seems to be based more on politics than science to me. But I could be wrong.   :dunno:
:tup: :tup:
It is hard to follow one great vision in a world of darkness and of many changing shadows. Among these shadows men get lost.
-Black Elk

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1833
Re: % for spring bear harvests
« Reply #29 on: April 01, 2013, 11:30:03 AM »
I guess I really wasn't trying to take a shot at the biologist.  Maybe it should have been the wdfw as a whole.
Sometimes biologists get overly defensive... :sry:
It is hard to follow one great vision in a world of darkness and of many changing shadows. Among these shadows men get lost.
-Black Elk

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bear Scratch on Tree by dreadi
[Today at 10:53:30 PM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by huntnnw
[Today at 10:52:52 PM]


That "lake taste" in freshwater fish by huntnnw
[Today at 10:49:33 PM]


90's Yamaha no telltale? by MADMAX
[Today at 10:04:40 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 09:36:02 PM]


E scouting for bears by SpicyTacos
[Today at 09:26:03 PM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Big6bull
[Today at 08:20:59 PM]


Pocket Carry by fly-by
[Today at 06:35:19 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by str8meat
[Today at 06:25:53 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Today at 05:36:47 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by vandeman17
[Today at 02:55:45 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Today at 02:44:10 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:42:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Today at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Today at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Today at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:35:23 PM]


Article on the beaver trapping ban in OR by Humptulips
[Today at 12:27:08 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Today at 11:27:32 AM]


Athlon Rangecraft Chrono by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 11:09:00 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal