Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Boss .300 winmag on April 21, 2013, 09:19:29 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 21, 2013, 09:18:02 PMI think Barnes are more expensive than the Bergers. I have never hunted with Bergers but a friend has and I have been impressed at all. I'm gonna agree with others above in that the Bergers are great for longer range, but I would prefer the Barnes for more realistic shots.$50.00 for 100 190 VLD's.and $39.00 for 50 180 TTSX
Quote from: sirmissalot on April 21, 2013, 09:18:02 PMI think Barnes are more expensive than the Bergers. I have never hunted with Bergers but a friend has and I have been impressed at all. I'm gonna agree with others above in that the Bergers are great for longer range, but I would prefer the Barnes for more realistic shots.$50.00 for 100 190 VLD's.
I think Barnes are more expensive than the Bergers. I have never hunted with Bergers but a friend has and I have been impressed at all. I'm gonna agree with others above in that the Bergers are great for longer range, but I would prefer the Barnes for more realistic shots.
Quote from: actionshooter on April 21, 2013, 09:01:46 PMQuote from: kentrek on April 21, 2013, 08:49:47 PMheres some history of bergers 2 spike bulls at 70 yards...one bullet blew up too early after hiting bone, the other perfomed perfect5 point bull at 275 in the chest,performed perfect6 point bull at 475 in the lungs,performed perfect5 point bull at 90 in the lungs,performed perfect3 point bt at 100 yards,performed perfect4 point wt at 50,performed perfect3 point wt in the chest at 90,loads of bloodshot but the deer died6 point wt at 100 in the lungs,perfectiontheres more but you get the idea i really dont think with modern bullets you can go wrong..esp from the ones your interested in..which ever has the best load is what id go withhope this helpsi dont think i would play the speed freak game with burgers tho...185s around 2900 seem to be money...i dont think you get much more from the speed with such a fragile bulletWow, quite the impressive resume.......... I wouldn't recommend the Bergers b/c the OP said he would be shooting 400 or less, the Bergers while good bullets are expensive. If he was asking for a bullet for shooting 750+ I would say "take a look at the Bergers" I have heard the guys who have tried to push the velocity with the Bergers have had issues with bone/separation.i was just showing that they work at closer ranges too,for what its worth my brother is looking to get away from the bergers..i dont think hes picked one yet but im pretty sure it will be the new accubonds..
Quote from: kentrek on April 21, 2013, 08:49:47 PMheres some history of bergers 2 spike bulls at 70 yards...one bullet blew up too early after hiting bone, the other perfomed perfect5 point bull at 275 in the chest,performed perfect6 point bull at 475 in the lungs,performed perfect5 point bull at 90 in the lungs,performed perfect3 point bt at 100 yards,performed perfect4 point wt at 50,performed perfect3 point wt in the chest at 90,loads of bloodshot but the deer died6 point wt at 100 in the lungs,perfectiontheres more but you get the idea i really dont think with modern bullets you can go wrong..esp from the ones your interested in..which ever has the best load is what id go withhope this helpsi dont think i would play the speed freak game with burgers tho...185s around 2900 seem to be money...i dont think you get much more from the speed with such a fragile bulletWow, quite the impressive resume.......... I wouldn't recommend the Bergers b/c the OP said he would be shooting 400 or less, the Bergers while good bullets are expensive. If he was asking for a bullet for shooting 750+ I would say "take a look at the Bergers" I have heard the guys who have tried to push the velocity with the Bergers have had issues with bone/separation.
heres some history of bergers 2 spike bulls at 70 yards...one bullet blew up too early after hiting bone, the other perfomed perfect5 point bull at 275 in the chest,performed perfect6 point bull at 475 in the lungs,performed perfect5 point bull at 90 in the lungs,performed perfect3 point bt at 100 yards,performed perfect4 point wt at 50,performed perfect3 point wt in the chest at 90,loads of bloodshot but the deer died6 point wt at 100 in the lungs,perfectiontheres more but you get the idea i really dont think with modern bullets you can go wrong..esp from the ones your interested in..which ever has the best load is what id go withhope this helpsi dont think i would play the speed freak game with burgers tho...185s around 2900 seem to be money...i dont think you get much more from the speed with such a fragile bullet
Quote from: kentrek on April 21, 2013, 09:36:18 PMQuote from: actionshooter on April 21, 2013, 09:01:46 PMQuote from: kentrek on April 21, 2013, 08:49:47 PMheres some history of bergers 2 spike bulls at 70 yards...one bullet blew up too early after hiting bone, the other perfomed perfect5 point bull at 275 in the chest,performed perfect6 point bull at 475 in the lungs,performed perfect5 point bull at 90 in the lungs,performed perfect3 point bt at 100 yards,performed perfect4 point wt at 50,performed perfect3 point wt in the chest at 90,loads of bloodshot but the deer died6 point wt at 100 in the lungs,perfectiontheres more but you get the idea i really dont think with modern bullets you can go wrong..esp from the ones your interested in..which ever has the best load is what id go withhope this helpsi dont think i would play the speed freak game with burgers tho...185s around 2900 seem to be money...i dont think you get much more from the speed with such a fragile bulletWow, quite the impressive resume.......... I wouldn't recommend the Bergers b/c the OP said he would be shooting 400 or less, the Bergers while good bullets are expensive. If he was asking for a bullet for shooting 750+ I would say "take a look at the Bergers" I have heard the guys who have tried to push the velocity with the Bergers have had issues with bone/separation.i was just showing that they work at closer ranges too,for what its worth my brother is looking to get away from the bergers..i dont think hes picked one yet but im pretty sure it will be the new accubonds.. I am curious about the new LR accubonds also. I'm wondering if the high BCs they are posting are accurate?
bergers too expensive? they are cheaper than accubonds or barnes!nothing at all wrong with a partition or accubond for what you want. heep your eyes on shootersproshop.com for seconds or overruns. i personally dont like the barnes dur to the mess they have made in the barrel of all the guns ive used them in. might look at the e tip also!
Quote from: BULLBLASTER on April 21, 2013, 09:23:21 PMbergers too expensive? they are cheaper than accubonds or barnes!nothing at all wrong with a partition or accubond for what you want. heep your eyes on shootersproshop.com for seconds or overruns. i personally dont like the barnes dur to the mess they have made in the barrel of all the guns ive used them in. might look at the e tip also!Why would they make any more of a mess than other bullets? They are all copper jacketed.
Might look at the Barnes Tipped Triples?? Proven for me on many big critters! You've seen the pics :-)
My general rule is to use either the TTSX or Accubond for a hunting load, and the Bergers for target loads. I've had some amazing groups with both the the Barnes and Nosler bullets though. My 358 Winchester shoots the 200gr TTSX in to .4" groups at 100 yards. I doubt I'd find anything out there that would do better than that!I'm just not convinced that the Bergers are an ideal hunting bullet. They'll certainly kill stuff. But I wouldn't personally use them on anything much bigger than a deer or small black bear. There are just so many excellent bullets designed for hunting that I don't see a need to use a target bullet to hunt with. Andrew