Free: Contests & Raffles.
Kind of getting off topic here but just to clarify even further, it is legal to have a loaded handgun in a vehicle if you are going to, or coming from, any outdoor recreational activity (hunting for example.) A CPL is not needed in this situation.
Quote from: bobcat on April 23, 2013, 02:52:52 PMKind of getting off topic here but just to clarify even further, it is legal to have a loaded handgun in a vehicle if you are going to, or coming from, any outdoor recreational activity (hunting for example.) A CPL is not needed in this situation.I think it is legal to carry concealed when engaged in those activities when not in a vehicle. Once it enters the vehicle a CPL is needed if it is loaded.
Quote from: snowpack on April 23, 2013, 02:57:33 PMQuote from: bobcat on April 23, 2013, 02:52:52 PMKind of getting off topic here but just to clarify even further, it is legal to have a loaded handgun in a vehicle if you are going to, or coming from, any outdoor recreational activity (hunting for example.) A CPL is not needed in this situation.I think it is legal to carry concealed when engaged in those activities when not in a vehicle. Once it enters the vehicle a CPL is needed if it is loaded.WRONG- read bobcats post, he is correct. It is even written in the little green book they give you when you get your cpl.
I think Seattle or King county has an ordinance about "opaque" cases, but am not sure.Carl
Quote from: snowpack on April 23, 2013, 12:04:08 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on April 23, 2013, 11:52:39 AMQuote from: smdave on April 23, 2013, 09:23:38 AMAnd in the school parking lot every truck had one with a gun in it.When I was in high school, I threw the .30-30 Model 94 in the back on the way to school so I could hunt after school. We'd be out in the lot showing each other our guns and talking about where we'd hunt. Imagine that today. You'd probably be taken out by a drone or a SWAT team (more likely a SWAT battalion ). Then the news shows would refer to you as right wing 2A nutjob and post your worst pictures all over.But I am a right wing, 2A nutjob. I don't have any bad pictures, though. I look awesome in everything!
Quote from: pianoman9701 on April 23, 2013, 11:52:39 AMQuote from: smdave on April 23, 2013, 09:23:38 AMAnd in the school parking lot every truck had one with a gun in it.When I was in high school, I threw the .30-30 Model 94 in the back on the way to school so I could hunt after school. We'd be out in the lot showing each other our guns and talking about where we'd hunt. Imagine that today. You'd probably be taken out by a drone or a SWAT team (more likely a SWAT battalion ). Then the news shows would refer to you as right wing 2A nutjob and post your worst pictures all over.
Quote from: smdave on April 23, 2013, 09:23:38 AMAnd in the school parking lot every truck had one with a gun in it.When I was in high school, I threw the .30-30 Model 94 in the back on the way to school so I could hunt after school. We'd be out in the lot showing each other our guns and talking about where we'd hunt. Imagine that today.
And in the school parking lot every truck had one with a gun in it.
Quote from: Bofire on April 25, 2013, 06:56:49 PM I think Seattle or King county has an ordinance about "opaque" cases, but am not sure.CarlRead the Preemption post in blue.No one,city,state,county can pass any gun law stricter than state law.The legislature is the only ones who can write gun laws.
This law is correct and applies ONLY to pistols kept loaded in a motor vehicle, enabled by owning a CPL. To keep a loaded pistol in your vehicle without a CPL would already be illegal, so no law needed there. I'm not sure what the law would be if you had an unloaded pistol in plain view without a CPL. I think legally that is acceptable, but I'm sure you'd lose your court case, mostly for being dumb.I have never seen a law pertaining to rifles or non-CPL pistols.Thanks for your input.