Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Equipment & Gear
»
Guns and Ammo
»
Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111 (Read 4591 times)
trapp01
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Hunter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 133
Location: North Bend
Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
on:
May 30, 2013, 08:29:34 PM »
Which is a better rifle. Im just looking to deer/ elk hunt with it. I have a 700 in .30-06 but im looking to get something is .308 thats stainless for under 600 bucks. Got any suggestions? This is for my wife. I've heard the savage 111 or axis is a good gun as well.
Thanks
Logged
Advertise Here
opdinkslayer
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2827
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #1 on:
May 31, 2013, 06:55:44 AM »
take her to a shop and see what fits her the best. I have both and would base my decision on fit and the best trigger. That being the accutrigger on the Savage imo. I think Cabelas has a Savage 16ss/nikon combo for around 600 bucks. you can't go wrong with either brand tho. good luck in your search and be open to other calibers as well.
Logged
AWS
Trade Count:
(
+2
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1838
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #2 on:
May 31, 2013, 07:03:05 AM »
It's a wash in my opinion. I have two target rifles, ones a Rem., ones a Sav. and I like them equally. Most of my hunting rifles are Savages but that is only because I like to putz with rifles. Savages are easier to change barrels, you can do it at home, no lathe needed to set headspace.
Out of the box the Rem is a better looking and feeling rifle but don't shoot any better than the Sav. Rem has more after market accessories available but the Sav is very close to it.
Handle both of them and pick the one you like best. I doubt that you will go wrong with either.
Logged
After the first shot the rest are just noise.
Make mine a Minaska
Bofire
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+5
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5524
Location: Yelm
Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #3 on:
May 31, 2013, 08:01:34 AM »
5 million Rem 700's can't be wrong!!
Logged
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!
I do not shop at Amazon
b23
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+7
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3308
Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #4 on:
May 31, 2013, 10:00:00 AM »
Right out of the box, Savage is probably building some of, if not, the best shooting factory guns on the market. I'm a HUGE Remington 700 fan and I think Savage builds, IMO, the ugliest action money can buy. BUT, if I was looking to purchase and off the rack rifle tomorrow, it would be a Savage. They shoot great right out of the box and they come with a very good, easily adjustable, trigger.
Now, if I was buying a rifle I knew I would some day rebarrel and or turn into a custom, I'd get the Rem. 700. You can certainly rebarrel a Savage also but the Rem 700 action is the small block Chevy of the gun world.
Best of luck to you on your purchase!!!
Logged
jaymark6655
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1911
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #5 on:
May 31, 2013, 10:53:55 AM »
I bought a 700 as my first rifle. The stocks, unless they are wood, are worthless. Since most of them are plastic, you can't get any decent or consistant action screw torque. The Savage has the new accu-stock with aluminum bedding, much better. The X-Mark trigger is okay, but not any safer than the original one and just failed the dop test for the miltary. Basically when dropped it will let the firearm discharge. A savage trigger might, but I think unless that safety lever in the trigger is depressed the gun won't fire.
For an out of the box rifle I would probably get a Savage, wish I had for my first.
Remington has good reputation, but with changing the stock and the trigger a person might be better off getting a bare receiver and barrel and building a rifle from there.'
TC also has a pretty good bolt gun, but I dont know much about it. It has a 5R barrel and 60 degree bolt through, but looks like another plastic stock with no type of pillars or bedding.
Logged
20 Zardoz Points!
"That's the reason we pay $25 for a recoil lug made by a professional instead of one for $0.50 made by Micheal J Fox using a dremel!"
"Women should be treated the same as a French Rifle, dropped at the first sign of trouble."
"Fair is a meaningless word taught to young children."
AWS
Trade Count:
(
+2
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1838
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #6 on:
May 31, 2013, 12:08:20 PM »
I've had very good luck with the factory plastic stocks on my Rem and Sav. I do skim bed them and really hog out the barrel channel and don't try and use a bipod on them.
Logged
After the first shot the rest are just noise.
Make mine a Minaska
Feanix
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Hunter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 246
Location: Tonasket, WA
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #7 on:
May 31, 2013, 02:55:59 PM »
Like was suggested, have your wife pick up both and see what fits. You can't go wrong with either one. My friend and shoot heavy barrel .308's long range. Mine is a Savage 10 and his a Rem 700. No difference in group sizes if we do our part.
Logged
high country
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5133
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #8 on:
June 03, 2013, 10:17:27 AM »
I would sure consider tossing the vanguard/howa into the consideration pile. Tis a lot of rifle for the dough. If I could get over the Chinese appearance of the savage, I would whole heartedly endorse them, but alas they are what they are. Remington's quality has gone south like an out of control rocketship. Howa still produces a tight rifle for a cheap price.
Logged
thinkingman
Trade Count:
(
+10
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2363
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #9 on:
June 05, 2013, 08:32:05 AM »
I vote Tikka with my own dollars.
I think you're less likely to get a lemon Savage than a Rem 700.
Logged
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell
jess
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Scout
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 375
Location: republic
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #10 on:
June 05, 2013, 08:36:16 AM »
remington 700... Not a savage fan!
Logged
xBlitzBurghx
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Pilgrim
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1
Location: Spokane
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #11 on:
June 05, 2013, 02:41:56 PM »
I'm very happy with my savage 111. It was my first rifle I bought though so I don't know much about rifles. Hasn't given me a problem yet though.
Logged
PNW_Hunter
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Hunter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 189
Location: Auburn
Groups: NRA Endowment Member, SAF Life Member, GOA Member, GSSF Life Member
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #12 on:
June 05, 2013, 03:59:10 PM »
Are you looking at the Rem 700 SPS? The stock on the SPS isnt the nicest, but it suffices.
Savages are tack drivers, but if its a Rem 700 vs Savage 111, i'd go with the Rem 700
If you can up your budget a smidge, take a look at the Tikkas...
Logged
GEARHEAD
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1783
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #13 on:
June 05, 2013, 11:38:06 PM »
700....NO CONTEST........You can shoot those reduced factory loads which will give you .308 numbers and less recoil....then if you want, you can throw in hornady superformance loads, and now its shooting 300 mag numbers.....keep the rifle, spend the 600 bucks on Her. you will recieve a better return on your investment.
Logged
PolarBear
Site Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
+4
)
Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 10468
Location: Tatooine
Re: Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
«
Reply #14 on:
June 06, 2013, 12:20:09 AM »
I'm a fan of both Remington and Savage but prefer the 700. Most snipers and competitive shooters (myself included) that I now start off with the 700 action and go from there. It is also an awesome rifle right out of the box.
Logged
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Equipment & Gear
»
Guns and Ammo
»
Rem. 700 vs Savage 111
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread
by
pianoman9701
[
Today
at 11:39:26 AM]
Archery Elk Advice
by
nelsonfirst
[
Today
at 11:08:32 AM]
DR Brush Mower won't crank
by
EnglishSetter
[
Today
at 11:05:03 AM]
Oregon special tag info
by
Judespapa
[
Today
at 10:56:27 AM]
MA-10 Coho
by
Sneaky
[
Today
at 10:53:12 AM]
Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle?
by
Big6bull
[
Today
at 10:10:07 AM]
Ground blind for blacktail
by
kyle_higg
[
Today
at 10:09:34 AM]
Bow mount trolling motors
by
Angry Perch
[
Today
at 09:50:16 AM]
Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle
by
pickardjw
[
Today
at 09:12:31 AM]
10 kokes
by
206
[
Today
at 07:51:31 AM]
Hoof Rot
by
fowl smacker
[
Today
at 06:28:53 AM]
Honda BF15A Outboard Problems
by
Sandberm
[
Yesterday
at 08:18:08 PM]
Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents
by
JDArms1240
[
Yesterday
at 08:16:36 PM]
Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands??
by
addicted1
[
Yesterday
at 06:47:44 PM]
A question for any FFL holders on here
by
ryan2202
[
Yesterday
at 05:01:26 PM]
I’m on a blacktail mission
by
addicted1
[
Yesterday
at 12:10:11 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal