Free: Contests & Raffles.
Is this for a CCW or just general use? Carrying cocked and locked takes a little getting used to, the Glock might have an advantage there depending on how you feel about that. I love shooting my 5" Kimber though, I think the 1911 works better as a full size gun.
Quote from: MP123 on June 25, 2013, 02:17:17 PMIs this for a CCW or just general use? Carrying cocked and locked takes a little getting used to, the Glock might have an advantage there depending on how you feel about that. I love shooting my 5" Kimber though, I think the 1911 works better as a full size gun.for all around use. I don't see it much different with the 1911 locker and cocked with the safety on versus the glock with a loaded chamber. Is there a major difference? Other than the hammer?
But they have a positive firing pin block that disengages the firing pin unless grip safety is depressed. So even a hammer falling without the grip safety depressed will not fire... in theory... I agree the booger picker and safety between brains is paramount.
What about the baby Glock 36?Single stack .45acp.
The Sig Scorpion is a amazing handgun.
I am 1911 all the way every time, I have owned them all. sigs HKs S&w autos glocks etc. 1911 for me. I shoot it better faster and love it and trust it. That said, 4 inch MINIMUM, 5 inch is wonderful. My 24/7 carry is a Kimber 4 inch pro carry I fergit tactical something name wise. Carl
Or this one...
I sold my glock 20 and bought a Kimber eclipse custom II full size. I couldn't be happier with my choice i am also looking at a Kimber compact but i am interested in the stainless ultra raptor II. I wish they would offer a bobtail version.
Shot the crap out of the Sig Nightmare the other day, ran like a champ. Not a single hick up but I still like the Scorpion better for some reason. Sig just makes a solid 1911.
I like the Kimbers from the custom shop.
There is compact, then there is subcompact. I think you are talking about a subcompact with a 3" barrel. The reason I say this is in a 1911, .45acp, subcompacts can be very finicky as you have a whole lot going on in a very short window of time. The pistol fires, slide comes back very quickly and has to strip a round very quickly with less mass to do it with (then a 5" slide). Basically some .45 1911 subcompacts or bullpups are good, some are jammomatics. Personally, as much as I like 1911's, I would stick to the Glocks/Springfields, etc. in a subcompact. OR, try a subcompact 1911 in 9mm. As far as a compact pistol (4-4.5" barrel), 1911 .45's are (usually) excellent. I have shot a few subcompacts, some run, some don't and others run when clean and wet (oiled) and some don't run well even then.
Quote from: 300rum on June 25, 2013, 02:23:53 PMThere is compact, then there is subcompact. I think you are talking about a subcompact with a 3" barrel. The reason I say this is in a 1911, .45acp, subcompacts can be very finicky as you have a whole lot going on in a very short window of time. The pistol fires, slide comes back very quickly and has to strip a round very quickly with less mass to do it with (then a 5" slide). Basically some .45 1911 subcompacts or bullpups are good, some are jammomatics. Personally, as much as I like 1911's, I would stick to the Glocks/Springfields, etc. in a subcompact. OR, try a subcompact 1911 in 9mm. As far as a compact pistol (4-4.5" barrel), 1911 .45's are (usually) excellent. I have shot a few subcompacts, some run, some don't and others run when clean and wet (oiled) and some don't run well even then. Nailed it.3" 1911's are a crapshoot.4" Commanders are awesome.IF you have to have a sub, there are better choices.