collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: results by unit and average number of points.  (Read 4169 times)

Offline HoofsandWings

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1467
  • Location: Kitsap
  • RETIRED
Gathering is easy. Hunting is a challenge.
WSF, WCA, RMEF, Rooster Booster, NWTF, NRA

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2013, 12:13:30 PM »
Wow! That was fast! That doesn't usually get put up for a couple months after the drawing.

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2013, 12:24:18 PM »
I noticed one interesting change- quality deer applications for Skookumchuck dropped by 38%.

Obviously due to the Weyerhaeuser closure.

Offline KNOPHISH

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 1571
  • Location: Auburn
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2013, 12:29:39 PM »
That's just depressing, I remember when there were more goat tags than sheep & moose combined, now it hardly looks worth it.
I have Man Chit to do

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2013, 12:36:04 PM »
Interesting they had a quota of 125 second deer tags for Spokane south rifle and only issued 79. But archery second deer Spokane south had a quota of 25 and 300+ applicants. Seems like they need to take some unissued rifle permits and put them into archery next time.

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2013, 12:38:46 PM »
The 2nd deer tags shouldn't require you to apply only for the ones that match your first tag. That would solve the problem.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2013, 12:44:23 PM »
The 2nd deer tags shouldn't require you to apply only for the ones that match your first tag. That would solve the problem.
that it would... one pile of second tags per area and season matches your tag choice...makes sense.

Online vandeman17

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 14487
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2013, 12:46:04 PM »
Depressing for me when I see both units I applied for in quality deer with 9 points and the average draw points were less then 7.
" I have hunted almost every day of my life, the rest have been wasted"

Offline Ridgerunner

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5068
  • Location: Enumclaw
results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2013, 12:47:10 PM »
I saw an increase in applicants for the units I was putting for, in looking at sheep they really had some big changes,

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2013, 12:51:27 PM »
The change in sheep was probably due to there being no Tieton permits this year.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2013, 01:03:28 PM »
That's just depressing, I remember when there were more goat tags than sheep & moose combined, now it hardly looks worth it.
I don't see why they can't give out goat permits on the peninsula again.  They have over 400 on the peninsula and the park says are non-native and wants to get rid of them.  I've seen lots of those goats wandering around the wilderness areas next adjacent to it.

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5567
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2013, 01:04:30 PM »
That's just depressing, I remember when there were more goat tags than sheep & moose combined, now it hardly looks worth it.

2012 status and trend report

The
harvest guidelines are to limit harvest opportunity to
4% or less of the total population, only allow harvest in
goat populations meeting or exceeding 100 total
animals, and limit harvest of nannies (females) to 30%
or less.

If we only counted herds of 100 or more goats and exclude all three national parks there would still be 71 permits at a 4% harvest. As it is we have less than a 1% tag to population ratio... Idaho has roughly the same number of goats and 53 tags. I don't think we have gotten an adequate reason for the disparity.

If the population was 10k animals in the 1950's and 60's with 0 harvest how long would it take to get the population back up to historic levels?
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19635
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2013, 01:09:49 PM »
Wow! That was fast! That doesn't usually get put up for a couple months after the drawing.
:yeah:why can't the drawing be that fast! I noticed the muzzy elk tag I put in for had double the applicants from last year?!? Wtf
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline WalleyeJason

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 71
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2013, 01:42:51 PM »
2082 PEACHES RIDGE  Average Winner Points 8.40

I was just below Average I guess. :dunno:

Offline Rooster1981

  • R.K.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 683
  • Location: Mason County
    • Roosters Kennel
Re: results by unit and average number of points.
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2013, 07:47:04 PM »

In the quality deer hunt I was aiming for, someone got one of the four tags with only one point.  Lucky hunter  :tup:
Hunting hounds since 1993

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Montana alternate list by Britt-dog
[Today at 03:44:26 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 01:52:01 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Today at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Today at 01:01:22 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by bearpaw
[Today at 12:02:58 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Today at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Today at 11:12:46 AM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 11:07:43 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by Dan-o
[Today at 08:44:37 AM]


Velvet by Brute
[Today at 08:37:08 AM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 06:12:44 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 05:43:11 AM]


Lizard Cam by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:48:54 AM]


Pocket Carry by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:33:35 PM]


2025 Coyotes by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 06:11:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal