Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: huntnphool on July 25, 2013, 06:02:36 PMQuote from: Trailtamer on July 25, 2013, 05:56:14 PMQuote from: boneaddict on June 27, 2013, 06:59:37 AMSuper frames, with no points,170-180 frames, but weak fronts or backsPoints that are mismatched and net nothingSuper MassOld bald faced mossyhornTrash.............Lets see some.That buck won't gross 180 thoughThats a shooter any day of the season, hell he probably has more bone than all my bucks put together. But hey i am a closet dink shooter.
Quote from: Trailtamer on July 25, 2013, 05:56:14 PMQuote from: boneaddict on June 27, 2013, 06:59:37 AMSuper frames, with no points,170-180 frames, but weak fronts or backsPoints that are mismatched and net nothingSuper MassOld bald faced mossyhornTrash.............Lets see some.That buck won't gross 180 though
Quote from: boneaddict on June 27, 2013, 06:59:37 AMSuper frames, with no points,170-180 frames, but weak fronts or backsPoints that are mismatched and net nothingSuper MassOld bald faced mossyhornTrash.............Lets see some.
Super frames, with no points,170-180 frames, but weak fronts or backsPoints that are mismatched and net nothingSuper MassOld bald faced mossyhornTrash.............Lets see some.
Quote from: Fowlweather25 on July 25, 2013, 06:27:14 PMQuote from: jackelope on July 25, 2013, 05:45:19 PMQuote from: huntnphool on July 25, 2013, 05:30:54 PMQuote from: Trailtamer on July 25, 2013, 05:27:04 PMWhat a nit picker Just keeping it on topic.Maybe he only normally shoots 200"er's.I do agree with phool though, there's a whole other thread devoted to 180" bucks which is where I'd be posting that one, although it might not be the biggest one in that thread. either way, probably not worth worrying much about.Coulda sworn that thread was for true 180 inch bucks. So in my opinion this is the perfect thread to post a buck that loses 21 inches in deductions.That is a true 180" buck. Nets are for fish.
Quote from: jackelope on July 25, 2013, 05:45:19 PMQuote from: huntnphool on July 25, 2013, 05:30:54 PMQuote from: Trailtamer on July 25, 2013, 05:27:04 PMWhat a nit picker Just keeping it on topic.Maybe he only normally shoots 200"er's.I do agree with phool though, there's a whole other thread devoted to 180" bucks which is where I'd be posting that one, although it might not be the biggest one in that thread. either way, probably not worth worrying much about.Coulda sworn that thread was for true 180 inch bucks. So in my opinion this is the perfect thread to post a buck that loses 21 inches in deductions.
Quote from: huntnphool on July 25, 2013, 05:30:54 PMQuote from: Trailtamer on July 25, 2013, 05:27:04 PMWhat a nit picker Just keeping it on topic.Maybe he only normally shoots 200"er's.I do agree with phool though, there's a whole other thread devoted to 180" bucks which is where I'd be posting that one, although it might not be the biggest one in that thread. either way, probably not worth worrying much about.
Quote from: Trailtamer on July 25, 2013, 05:27:04 PMWhat a nit picker Just keeping it on topic.
What a nit picker
B&C as well as P&Y dont think nets are for fish
ok.This isn't my thread and I couldn't care less who posts what in it. I personally believe in giving the buck credit for what he grew. I also couldn't care less about records books. Maybe I should have posted that instead of "nets are for fish".Trailtamer, if I ever kill a buck as big as yours, I'd crap myself. You should be proud of that buck. Sounds like you're discrediting it, pointing out all of his flaws. Carry on.
Found another
here one
