Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Special T on June 28, 2013, 10:09:41 AMThe contradiction is in the fact that wolves have been absent from this state for 70 years, and that is what the WDFW has been selling. I be live that it was in this same time period that the WDFW made coyote hunting illegal in the Psyaden because of the presence of wolves.You may not believe in the reintroduction of wolves into this state, however it IS a fact that they were reintroduced into ID and YNP from way up north in the Canadian makensy valley. There are LOTS of statements made by the WDFW that don't line up. Many seem to think that because we question the wdfw we wear tinfoil hats. MANY good honest questions have been asked of the WDFW and we get fed cock and bull answers. This either means the WDFW is full if Inept people that can't do their job, OR they are a bunch of liars. In either case its not good for hunters OR citizens of washington.I honestly don't care where they came from. They're here, not likely to go away, and I just wish the state would let everyone protect themselves and what's theirs from them when necessary.I'll say this, it is interesting that the state said there were SIX packs back in '92 and today they recognize only 10-12 packs. That either means they're seriously low balling the number or they aren't quite as prolific as everyone makes them out to be. My gut feeling is the truth is somewhere in the middle.
The contradiction is in the fact that wolves have been absent from this state for 70 years, and that is what the WDFW has been selling. I be live that it was in this same time period that the WDFW made coyote hunting illegal in the Psyaden because of the presence of wolves.You may not believe in the reintroduction of wolves into this state, however it IS a fact that they were reintroduced into ID and YNP from way up north in the Canadian makensy valley. There are LOTS of statements made by the WDFW that don't line up. Many seem to think that because we question the wdfw we wear tinfoil hats. MANY good honest questions have been asked of the WDFW and we get fed cock and bull answers. This either means the WDFW is full if Inept people that can't do their job, OR they are a bunch of liars. In either case its not good for hunters OR citizens of washington.
What the hell is wrong with this state?
Quote from: wolfbait on July 01, 2013, 11:11:22 PMWhat the hell is wrong with this state? That's easy, the money in this state is concentrated on the west side, where people think closely built subdivisions and houses on 2000-5000 square foot lots selling for $250,000-$500,000 is normal and ok.Most folks don't see much wildlife in neighborhoods like that or on lots that small and if you look at hunter numbers in the state I think you'll see an even more disheartening trend since 1950.We had barely more than 227,000 licensed hunters in this state back in 2001 and that number isn't substantially better today. Considering we have almost 7 million people in the state now I think the answer to your question lies right there.
I was in attendance at the WDFW meeting when the commission voted to end coyote hunting to protect the wolves in the Paysaten back in the 90's, I remember that day well. Unless they have destroyed those recorded tapes it's on record, that certainly contradicts WDFW claims that the Lookout Pack is the first pack in 70 years. That news story about the 6 packs back in 1991 also verifies that WDFW was claiming there were 6 packs of wolves then. They have lied to the people of Washington, either in 1991 or more recently, but one time or the other they clearly lied to us about wolves.
Tell us again about the UPS truck "release"... and about that big court case you had planned a year or so ago that was on the down low. What ever came of that?
Quote from: wolfbait on June 28, 2013, 10:55:09 AMQuote from: X-Force on June 28, 2013, 10:50:08 AMDid they ever publish a map of the 1992 packs? It would be interesting to stomp around some of those pack areas?Did they define a pack the way they do today?In Washington, Feds Opt For Wolf Introduction Over Recovery http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/06/08/in-washington-feds-opt-for-wolf-introduction-over-recovery/This still lends credence to my point. If they had to introduce wolves to WA when packs were already known to exist that likely means they are not very prolific and that runs totally counter to what is being sold about them these days.WDFW isn't going to admit to much of anything I suspect because they know a lot of folks don't want wolves around. So they'll wait until the numbers are so high that it becomes nearly impossible to eliminate them. It's probably sort of like how WSU has sent out people to work with farmers and ranchers to rebuild habitat etc in the past. Typically all communication is done on the sly and university employees work "under cover" because the farmers/ranchers that work with them don't want to be black balled by their neighbors.
Quote from: X-Force on June 28, 2013, 10:50:08 AMDid they ever publish a map of the 1992 packs? It would be interesting to stomp around some of those pack areas?Did they define a pack the way they do today?In Washington, Feds Opt For Wolf Introduction Over Recovery http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/06/08/in-washington-feds-opt-for-wolf-introduction-over-recovery/
Did they ever publish a map of the 1992 packs? It would be interesting to stomp around some of those pack areas?Did they define a pack the way they do today?
Among his best known stunts include:- Organizing the first spotted owl protection protests- Spending many hours in the canopy of ancient trees as one of the first tree-sitting protesters- Conceiving and organizing the Ancient Forest Rescue Expedition, nationwide educational tours featuring a giant log towed by a semi-truck- Executing the first non-logging high bid for a Forest Service timber sale (called Thunder Mountain)- Spearheading the conservation acquisition of the Loomis State Forest wildlands, as well as the highly successful coalition effort, The Cascades Conservation Partnership
Quote from: WAcoyotehunter on July 07, 2013, 10:41:49 PMTell us again about the UPS truck "release"... and about that big court case you had planned a year or so ago that was on the down low. What ever came of that? As you know it wasn't a UPS truck but instead a USFWS truck. As for the lawsuits, there will be many I'm sure. W-Coyote You have been packing water for WDFW for at least five years now, has Scott Fitkin offered you a job yet? You could be his head tracker, trapper. You would fit right in here in the Methow. I could even point you to where the Real wolf tracks are. But I suppose you would rather hunker down in the office with scotty, and shoot the chit about more habitat you could buy. By the way W-coyote could you ask Fitkin about his lie of first wolf pack in seventy years, and get back to us! Think you can do that before obamacare kicks in?BP>>I was in attendance at the WDFW meeting when the commission voted to end coyote hunting to protect the wolves in the Paysaten back in the 90's, I remember that day well. Unless they have destroyed those recorded tapes it's on record, that certainly contradicts WDFW claims that the Lookout Pack is the first pack in 70 years. That news story about the 6 packs back in 1991 also verifies that WDFW was claiming there were 6 packs of wolves then. They have lied to the people of Washington, either in 1991 or more recently, but one time or the other they clearly lied to us about wolves.
Quote from: wolfbait on August 03, 2013, 09:09:07 PMQuote from: WAcoyotehunter on July 07, 2013, 10:41:49 PMTell us again about the UPS truck "release"... and about that big court case you had planned a year or so ago that was on the down low. What ever came of that? As you know it wasn't a UPS truck but instead a USFWS truck. As for the lawsuits, there will be many I'm sure. W-Coyote You have been packing water for WDFW for at least five years now, has Scott Fitkin offered you a job yet? You could be his head tracker, trapper. You would fit right in here in the Methow. I could even point you to where the Real wolf tracks are. But I suppose you would rather hunker down in the office with scotty, and shoot the chit about more habitat you could buy. By the way W-coyote could you ask Fitkin about his lie of first wolf pack in seventy years, and get back to us! Think you can do that before obamacare kicks in?BP>>I was in attendance at the WDFW meeting when the commission voted to end coyote hunting to protect the wolves in the Paysaten back in the 90's, I remember that day well. Unless they have destroyed those recorded tapes it's on record, that certainly contradicts WDFW claims that the Lookout Pack is the first pack in 70 years. That news story about the 6 packs back in 1991 also verifies that WDFW was claiming there were 6 packs of wolves then. They have lied to the people of Washington, either in 1991 or more recently, but one time or the other they clearly lied to us about wolves. You said it was a UPS truck... the feds or state in disguise. We all clearly remember you saying that.The "first wolf pack in 70 years" thing is a difficult one. I think there were quite a few people that knew there were some wolves up there, but they couldn't (or wouldn't?) go survey and appropriately document the "pack". I have an old paper on the howling responses of coyotes to calls and they mention getting a response from wolves in the Pasayten sometime back in the 80's. It was never a secret. They just never went through any process of documentation.