collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 4-point rule 117/121  (Read 92881 times)

Offline hambone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 594
  • Location: spokane valley
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #105 on: July 17, 2013, 10:17:33 PM »
I seen some big bucks  in 49 help drag a buck up to a ridge that was huge hope the 4 point rule helps the herd

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #106 on: July 18, 2013, 07:54:43 AM »
http://www.whitetailinstitute.com/info/news/jul03/2.html

It looks like Charles J. Alsheimer agrees with you PA.
I asked my friend to respond to the idea of no exemptions for first time hunters or youth hunters when it comes to antler restrictions. He said.  “I think it's ridiculous to place such rules on kids. Kids are processing a lot of rules when it comes to hunting…. safety, taking good shots, ethics, etc. Overloading them with all this, then requiring that they be able to make a snap decision regarding the size of a buck’s antlers width is a bit much. They cannot handle it. If you place too many rules on youngsters, they’ll quit.  Kids want to be successful. There have been many studies done that show that kids who are not successful drop out of the endeavor./b]
Good Article Our young generation is a fast food generation. I've worked w/youth at church, apprentice lineman and my own kids. This one statement says it all. Thanks for posting.

Offline Hunt4ever

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 271
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #107 on: July 18, 2013, 08:07:50 AM »
http://www.whitetailinstitute.com/info/news/jul03/2.html

It looks like Charles J. Alsheimer agrees with you PA.
I asked my friend to respond to the idea of no exemptions for first time hunters or youth hunters when it comes to antler restrictions. He said.  “I think it's ridiculous to place such rules on kids. Kids are processing a lot of rules when it comes to hunting…. safety, taking good shots, ethics, etc. Overloading them with all this, then requiring that they be able to make a snap decision regarding the size of a buck’s antlers width is a bit much. They cannot handle it. If you place too many rules on youngsters, they’ll quit.  Kids want to be successful. There have been many studies done that show that kids who are not successful drop out of the endeavor./b]
Good Article Our young generation is a fast food generation. I've worked w/youth at church, apprentice lineman and my own kids. This one statement says it all. Thanks for posting.


I shot my first deer at 8 y/o and my dad made me pass up at least 5 spike to fork bucks just to get rid of the fever a little and teach me to be selective and make smart shots... I never lost interest... There are antler restrictions of many kinds in this state and others and the idea to start the kids off shooting any moving target because they dont have to follow the rules, then cut them loose a few years down the road and just expect there age to change there judgment (I see some fork muleys hitting the ground in there future).... I love the restriction

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #108 on: July 18, 2013, 10:31:35 AM »
I really disagree PA, and that's OK.    I really don't buy into the Give every Kid an A attitude.  Failure brings success.  I have a hard time swallowing the Entitlement generations antics.   If its too much for them to be able to discern between a legal deer and a not legal deer, then maybe they shouldn't be standing behind a high powered rifle, willing to take a life. :dunno:

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #109 on: July 18, 2013, 10:46:43 AM »
I wonder if anyone thinks that kids should be allowed to any bull in 3 pt minimum westside elk units.  Or any bull in eastern washington? 

Hunting for spike elk is difficult right?  Should the elk herd be threatened further so kids can kill one?  Is this much different than the proposed changes for youth hunter for the whitetail in 117/121?

I'm not trying to  :stirthepot: I pose these questions because I don't see a big difference here.
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #110 on: July 18, 2013, 10:51:27 AM »
 :yeah:
I grew up hunting mule deer and didn't expect to be able to shoot a spike or forky because I was a child. I didn't have a sense of entitlement like that. I hunted for legal bucks unless I drew a doe tag then I hunted.for does. The children can already shoot a doe during.the Whitetail youth seasons...

Offline dscubame

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3603
  • Location: Spokane WA
  • 2013 Idaho Elk Hunt
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #111 on: July 18, 2013, 10:56:53 AM »
I really disagree PA, and that's OK.    I really don't buy into the Give every Kid an A attitude.  Failure brings success.  I have a hard time swallowing the Entitlement generations antics.   If its too much for them to be able to discern between a legal deer and a not legal deer, then maybe they shouldn't be standing behind a high powered rifle, willing to take a life. :dunno:

 :tup:
It's a TIKKA thing..., you may not understand.

Eyes in the Woods.   ' '

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #112 on: July 18, 2013, 12:04:59 PM »
to each there own. Just my  :twocents: I have a lot of experience w/first timer hunters, I know that there are different schools of thought on this, but what I do know is that a solid rest and shot placement is very important for the young hunter, just the wt. of the gun makes off hand shots impossible. By the time, not always, when you figure out it's a legal buck it's too late for a shot. Some not so carefull adults taking kids out will let them take a risky shot, then the kids freaks out over a wounded deer. I also think there should be cow tags for youth in the North west corner where there are no cow. BTW, it's nice to have civil discussion. 

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #113 on: July 18, 2013, 02:23:03 PM »
I also think there should be cow tags for youth in the North west corner where there are no cow. BTW, it's nice to have civil discussion.

There should be cow tags for where there are no cows?  Is that how you meant it?  :dunno:

I too was thinking it was nice to have a relatively less flammatory conversation about a "Hot Topic"  :tup:
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #114 on: July 18, 2013, 03:12:30 PM »
I also think there should be cow tags for youth in the North west corner where there are no cow. BTW, it's nice to have civil discussion.

There should be cow tags for where there are no cows?  Is that how you meant it?  :dunno:

I too was thinking it was nice to have a relatively less flammatory conversation about a "Hot Topic"  :tup:
OOPs that would be no cow tags at all. :sry:

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #115 on: July 18, 2013, 03:14:05 PM »
I understood what was meant.  :chuckle:
I would also be on board with that!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #116 on: July 18, 2013, 03:28:07 PM »
I'd rather get the population higher first.  I only like antlerless hunts when the population needs to be thinned out for health reasons, damage control or carrying capacity.   I very much disagree with antlerless hunts just for opportunity.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12860
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #117 on: July 18, 2013, 03:29:46 PM »
I'd rather get the population higher first.  I only like antlerless hunts when the population needs to be thinned out for health reasons, damage control or carrying capacity.   I very much disagree with antlerless hunts just for opportunity.

:yeah:

sent from my typewriter

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #118 on: July 18, 2013, 04:15:02 PM »
I'd go statewide all species(deer).......but thats just me.   :chuckle:

Me too........and that doesn't include eye guards!

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #119 on: July 18, 2013, 04:28:04 PM »
I'd go statewide all species(deer).......but thats just me.   :chuckle:

Me too........and that doesn't include eye guards!

You've never hunted blacktail have you?
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by huntinluva
[Today at 10:01:53 AM]


Goose hunting with vice grips by Night goat
[Today at 08:46:21 AM]


Drew Quality by Ridgerunner
[Today at 08:32:55 AM]


Youth Cow Tag by jhouckwsu
[Today at 07:16:57 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Today at 05:58:49 AM]


People on Cams by hunter399
[Today at 05:56:38 AM]


Norway pass Elk by furbearer365
[Today at 05:46:12 AM]


Norway Pass Bull by High Climber
[Yesterday at 09:23:10 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by IDWAHunt
[Yesterday at 07:54:08 PM]


Steel Targets??? by bowman
[Yesterday at 07:41:07 PM]


Is FS70 open? by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 06:08:08 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 04:24:08 PM]


Idaho unit 76 cow elk Oct 25 to Nov 15 by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 02:11:35 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:34:16 AM]


No trespassing, hunting, fishing signs posted along Skykomish river by jackelope
[Yesterday at 10:11:26 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 09:55:59 AM]


2025 OILS! by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 09:14:25 AM]


Looking for English Pointer pup (Elhew and/or Guard Rail lines) by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 07:22:10 AM]


Buying pheasants for training by trapp01
[June 14, 2025, 08:44:40 PM]


Mt. Spokane North Moose by Farmer72
[June 14, 2025, 08:12:24 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal