collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ducks on the pond  (Read 8505 times)

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #30 on: October 17, 2013, 03:06:51 PM »
I shoot them any way I can, priority one is the freezer.

hmm? Do you flock shoot too?

That's hardly a fair comparison.  Shooting a duck on the water is in no way comparable to potentially breaking the LAW by dropping more than a limit's worth of ducks.  Ethics are a personal choice, your are yours, yours are not someone else's.   :bash:    Some people might think it is unethical to shoot at a duck with anything other than a .410, does that make all the 12g hunters unethical??   :dunno:

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2013, 03:32:44 PM by singleshot12 »
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline sakoshooter

  • WFW Board of Directors
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3597
  • Location: Puyallup
  • Groups: Life Memberr NRA, Life Member Sumner Sportsmans Association
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #31 on: October 17, 2013, 06:59:33 PM »
It is darn hard to kill a duck/goose on the water with it's wings folded up covering it's vitals AND most of it's vitals under water. That being said, sport is why I'm hunting waterfowl. Yes, entertainment, period. The meat all gets used in various recipes but if you're hunting ducks strictly for the meat, you need to realize that you're spending about $500.00 per lb after all that gear etc. Go to Top Foods and buy some T Bone steaks instead. Save your money. Besides, shotguns are made for shooting moving targets. That's why they have a projectile that spreads out. My  :twocents:
Rhinelander, WI
Home of the Hodag

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #32 on: October 17, 2013, 07:17:25 PM »

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

let's here your definition of flock shooting.   :dunno:

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #33 on: October 17, 2013, 08:22:04 PM »
I shoot them any way I can, priority one is the freezer.

hmm? Do you flock shoot too?

That's hardly a fair comparison.  Shooting a duck on the water is in no way comparable to potentially breaking the LAW by dropping more than a limit's worth of ducks.  Ethics are a personal choice, your are yours, yours are not someone else's.   :bash:    Some people might think it is unethical to shoot at a duck with anything other than a .410, does that make all the 12g hunters unethical??   :dunno:

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

"flock shooting" may lead to an illegal condition of going over limit, sluicing a bird on the water will not lead to an illegal condition, if the bird was a legal one to shoot at in the first place.  Apples to oranges.

Personally, I think most people that shoot at a duck farther than 40 yards away are unethical because they do not have the skill to cleanly kill that bird... so what?  It is not my place to tell you what YOUR ethics should be.  I may choose not to do it, or choose not to hunt with someone who does, but that is as far as my, or your, opinion should go.  Worry about yourself, not me.

Offline JJD

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 959
  • Location: Right side WA state
  • Groups: NRA, DU
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #34 on: October 17, 2013, 09:53:45 PM »
I shoot them any way I can, priority one is the freezer.
That thing you be holdin in your right hand will fit in your freezer too.   :chuckle:
Spent most of my $$ on huntin, fishin & retrievin dogs, the rest I just pretty much wasted.

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #35 on: October 17, 2013, 10:27:20 PM »

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

let's here your definition of flock shooting.   :dunno:

How many birds does it take to make a flock 5? :dunno: :chuckle: I thought there was only one definition of flock shooting-and that's shooting into a flock of birds sitting of flying and wounding just as much if not more than you retrieve.
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #36 on: October 18, 2013, 04:57:51 AM »

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

let's here your definition of flock shooting.   :dunno:

How many birds does it take to make a flock 5? :dunno: :chuckle: I thought there was only one definition of flock shooting-and that's shooting into a flock of birds sitting of flying and wounding just as much if not more than you retrieve.

So based on that anyone who shoots at a group of birds with 5 or more birds in it is unethical in your view? 

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #37 on: October 18, 2013, 07:07:00 AM »
absolutely! If you are not picking your bird you are taking a chance at wounding others
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline MC37493

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 108
  • Location: woods
  • Groups: DU,STS, RMEF, Pheasants Forever
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #38 on: October 20, 2013, 02:18:14 PM »
I always enjoy shooting them in the air, nothing more satisfying then watching a flock of mallards decoy in and your able to fold 3 of them  :tup: but i was up at skagit yesterday and had two teal land about a 100 yards from my dekes i gave them a few peeps and they started swimming towards once they were about 15 yards away i jumped up.. and they just sat there floating i waved my arm at them and they still didnt fly! After waving my arm again i just decided to sluice one and then got the other on the wing.. I would have liked to try and get them both flying but i guess those ducks were committing suicide or something. Also had a mallard come into my dekes when i was standing in the middle of them fixing one. it was an odd day for ducks!

Offline Pilot_Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 180
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #39 on: October 20, 2013, 03:16:34 PM »
I think some of you may be referring to sky-busting? Shooting at birds that you know are too high but hoping one will cripple and fall.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Muzzy needs by JakeLand
[Today at 08:13:38 AM]


Are all case trimmers created equal? by Bushcraft
[Today at 07:56:21 AM]


.410 for turkey? by Russ McDonald
[Today at 07:54:03 AM]


management buck by boneaddict
[Today at 07:51:46 AM]


Prince of Wales Spring Bear 2026 by RB
[Today at 07:42:36 AM]


Spring Brear Hunting by mad impulse
[Today at 07:19:30 AM]


public land blacktail traditional archer by Sundance
[Today at 07:13:57 AM]


Another reloading newb question by HereDuckyDucky
[Today at 07:06:14 AM]


Colville locals, know anyone that needs some coyote control? by GeoSwan
[Today at 01:48:26 AM]


Charcuterie by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 09:09:24 PM]


Are these the same cats by furbearer365
[Yesterday at 07:26:42 PM]


House Bill 1311 Aligning with WDFW Recommendations to Downlist Wolves by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 05:39:47 PM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 01:48:24 PM]


Commercial Huckleberry Picking Survey--Gifford Pinchot by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 01:09:56 PM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by Broomd
[Yesterday at 12:48:06 PM]


Beretta Tomcat 30X,tip up barrel by cdriver
[Yesterday at 12:37:49 PM]


Blueprint for next year by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 11:29:19 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal