collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ducks on the pond  (Read 8358 times)

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #30 on: October 17, 2013, 03:06:51 PM »
I shoot them any way I can, priority one is the freezer.

hmm? Do you flock shoot too?

That's hardly a fair comparison.  Shooting a duck on the water is in no way comparable to potentially breaking the LAW by dropping more than a limit's worth of ducks.  Ethics are a personal choice, your are yours, yours are not someone else's.   :bash:    Some people might think it is unethical to shoot at a duck with anything other than a .410, does that make all the 12g hunters unethical??   :dunno:

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2013, 03:32:44 PM by singleshot12 »
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline sakoshooter

  • WFW Board of Directors
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3597
  • Location: Puyallup
  • Groups: Life Memberr NRA, Life Member Sumner Sportsmans Association
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #31 on: October 17, 2013, 06:59:33 PM »
It is darn hard to kill a duck/goose on the water with it's wings folded up covering it's vitals AND most of it's vitals under water. That being said, sport is why I'm hunting waterfowl. Yes, entertainment, period. The meat all gets used in various recipes but if you're hunting ducks strictly for the meat, you need to realize that you're spending about $500.00 per lb after all that gear etc. Go to Top Foods and buy some T Bone steaks instead. Save your money. Besides, shotguns are made for shooting moving targets. That's why they have a projectile that spreads out. My  :twocents:
Rhinelander, WI
Home of the Hodag

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #32 on: October 17, 2013, 07:17:25 PM »

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

let's here your definition of flock shooting.   :dunno:

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #33 on: October 17, 2013, 08:22:04 PM »
I shoot them any way I can, priority one is the freezer.

hmm? Do you flock shoot too?

That's hardly a fair comparison.  Shooting a duck on the water is in no way comparable to potentially breaking the LAW by dropping more than a limit's worth of ducks.  Ethics are a personal choice, your are yours, yours are not someone else's.   :bash:    Some people might think it is unethical to shoot at a duck with anything other than a .410, does that make all the 12g hunters unethical??   :dunno:

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

"flock shooting" may lead to an illegal condition of going over limit, sluicing a bird on the water will not lead to an illegal condition, if the bird was a legal one to shoot at in the first place.  Apples to oranges.

Personally, I think most people that shoot at a duck farther than 40 yards away are unethical because they do not have the skill to cleanly kill that bird... so what?  It is not my place to tell you what YOUR ethics should be.  I may choose not to do it, or choose not to hunt with someone who does, but that is as far as my, or your, opinion should go.  Worry about yourself, not me.

Offline JJD

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 959
  • Location: Right side WA state
  • Groups: NRA, DU
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #34 on: October 17, 2013, 09:53:45 PM »
I shoot them any way I can, priority one is the freezer.
That thing you be holdin in your right hand will fit in your freezer too.   :chuckle:
Spent most of my $$ on huntin, fishin & retrievin dogs, the rest I just pretty much wasted.

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #35 on: October 17, 2013, 10:27:20 PM »

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

let's here your definition of flock shooting.   :dunno:

How many birds does it take to make a flock 5? :dunno: :chuckle: I thought there was only one definition of flock shooting-and that's shooting into a flock of birds sitting of flying and wounding just as much if not more than you retrieve.
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #36 on: October 18, 2013, 04:57:51 AM »

Well he said he shoots them any way he can,just sayin :chuckle:

Flock shooting and sluicing are both legal methods for waterfowl but NOT ethical. I remember the HS instructor pointing this out clearly to the class.

let's here your definition of flock shooting.   :dunno:

How many birds does it take to make a flock 5? :dunno: :chuckle: I thought there was only one definition of flock shooting-and that's shooting into a flock of birds sitting of flying and wounding just as much if not more than you retrieve.

So based on that anyone who shoots at a group of birds with 5 or more birds in it is unethical in your view? 

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #37 on: October 18, 2013, 07:07:00 AM »
absolutely! If you are not picking your bird you are taking a chance at wounding others
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline MC37493

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 108
  • Location: woods
  • Groups: DU,STS, RMEF, Pheasants Forever
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #38 on: October 20, 2013, 02:18:14 PM »
I always enjoy shooting them in the air, nothing more satisfying then watching a flock of mallards decoy in and your able to fold 3 of them  :tup: but i was up at skagit yesterday and had two teal land about a 100 yards from my dekes i gave them a few peeps and they started swimming towards once they were about 15 yards away i jumped up.. and they just sat there floating i waved my arm at them and they still didnt fly! After waving my arm again i just decided to sluice one and then got the other on the wing.. I would have liked to try and get them both flying but i guess those ducks were committing suicide or something. Also had a mallard come into my dekes when i was standing in the middle of them fixing one. it was an odd day for ducks!

Offline Pilot_Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 180
Re: Ducks on the pond
« Reply #39 on: October 20, 2013, 03:16:34 PM »
I think some of you may be referring to sky-busting? Shooting at birds that you know are too high but hoping one will cripple and fall.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by hookr88
[Today at 03:50:53 PM]


Pack/ backpack to carry a folding long and edc etc.? by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:50:51 PM]


Blackstone newbie by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:44:09 PM]


The Lookback by boneaddict
[Today at 03:40:21 PM]


Put a ring on it by LDennis24
[Today at 03:08:19 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Machias
[Today at 02:22:50 PM]


Long shot by highcountry_hunter
[Today at 01:51:05 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by HntnFsh
[Today at 01:49:45 PM]


Really would you send your dog? by EnglishSetter
[Today at 01:20:19 PM]


Idaho Non-res hunt draw by kselkhunter
[Today at 11:13:01 AM]


Kubota repair shop by Ridgeratt
[Today at 10:29:47 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 09:34:17 AM]


The Hunt for a Next level buck… by teanawayslayer
[Today at 08:13:39 AM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 08:07:07 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 12:51:24 AM]


Rut Buddies by 270Flat
[Yesterday at 11:10:04 PM]


more mass?, not sure I care by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 09:44:27 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 07:17:56 PM]


The "King" by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 03:15:02 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:05:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal