collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wild Olympics  (Read 10488 times)

Offline coastal ghost hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 4
  • Location: Cimacum
Wild Olympics
« on: October 17, 2013, 02:21:57 PM »
Over here in Jefferson county there is an act that the Liberals are pushing and it is backed by Patty Murray. This bill would potentially effect hunting land, Logging land, Christmas tree hunting, and firewood cutting. These people are telling the communities around here that the bill will not effect anything but just enforce the laws already at hand for logging and recreational firewood cutting. I worry that this bill will pass and us hunters and others who use the freedoms in the National Forest, will loose around 150,000 acres of land that will be swollowed up by National Park. Bad stuff. Give me your input or any facts I can use for the fight over here. Thanks

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5567
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2013, 02:45:46 PM »
I'll have to look into this a more. haven't heard anything about it. it looks like a big land grab like the ncnp expansion.
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline coastal ghost hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 4
  • Location: Cimacum
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2013, 02:53:05 PM »
It just stresses me out because I hunt there and I don't need a discover pass and I never see people there.

Offline asl20bball

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 358
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2013, 03:00:10 PM »
It was my understanding that this new wildlife area is more of a road closure (like that of a wilderness designation) as oppossed to an expansion of the national park which would close down the new area for hunting. I can't say what the effect w/b regarding firewood cutting etc.  Either way I'm against it. :bash:
Take up your bow, a quiver full of arrows, head out to the country and hunt some wild game.  GEN 27:3

Offline bowbuild

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 835
  • Location: Elma, wa.
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2013, 08:48:09 PM »
Then it wouldn't be all that far from them to try to extend the "park" next. 8)

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2014, 07:38:24 PM »

Offline blackdog

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 636
  • Location: Coastal
  • Advocate ..
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2014, 08:37:42 AM »
I am opposed. !20,000 +acres of wilderness on Forest Service ground, nearly every river on the peninsula becomes wild and scenic. It does not restore access to the Dosewallops, or to the "bridge to nowhere" on Sam's River. It rewards the bad behavior of the Washington DC and Wall Street special interests that now own our economy. Makes antigunners Dicks and Murray heroes with the antihunters. Yea I oppose this worthless Congressional piece of crap. :bdid:

Offline blackdog

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 636
  • Location: Coastal
  • Advocate ..
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2014, 08:42:23 AM »
http://exotichikes.com/the-end-of-the-olympic-national-parks-enchanted-valley-chalet/ This what wilderness gets us, paralyzed agencies and endless process.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2014, 09:16:34 AM »
I am opposed. !20,000 +acres of wilderness on Forest Service ground, nearly every river on the peninsula becomes wild and scenic. It does not restore access to the Dosewallops, or to the "bridge to nowhere" on Sam's River. It rewards the bad behavior of the Washington DC and Wall Street special interests that now own our economy. Makes antigunners Dicks and Murray heroes with the antihunters. Yea I oppose this worthless Congressional piece of crap. :bdid:
:yeah: :bdid: As I did with the wild sky land grab. Those who sit at desks in Seattle , DC, or anywhere else just love to "protect" things and restrict access to others as  any good  nanny state would. They seem to NEVER get "enough".  This country would be better off if our POS elected morons would work on the real issues instead of imagining  new ones to throw  our (not their) money at.

 He added amendments to keep existing roads in place, enhance fire-fighting capability and assure protection for private landowners.
 A judge CAN take that out with the stroke of a pen.

 AND no editorializing in this fair and balanced reporting......
"Don’t hold your breath.  The bill goes to the House Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash.

Hastings has almost never seen any piece of federal land that he doesn’t want to log, or mine, or drill, or turn over to state or private ownership."


Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups and quit losing opportunity.
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10633
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2014, 12:31:35 PM »
Hastings has almost never seen any piece of federal land that he doesn’t want to log, or mine, or drill, or turn over to state or private ownership."

Actually Hastings is the prime sponsor of a bill that would create the Manhattan Project National Historical Park in WA and other states under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. So he is not totally anti fed land management.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2014, 12:53:10 PM »


 He added amendments to keep existing roads in place, enhance fire-fighting capability and assure protection for private landowners.
 A judge CAN take that out with the stroke of a pen.

I think the road thing is a trap.  They say the roads will stay for the creation.  But wilderness boundaries and wild scenic boundaries will run up to the road buffer zones.  So as soon as part of the road washes out it will be near impossible to repair/redirect even a small portion due to wilderness/WS rules, FS road budgets and all kinds of lawsuits the greenies will file.  So the USFS will just have to place boulders near the closest wide spot and however much road beyond is now shutdown.  I wouldn't put it past the greenies to stuff culverts with hay or duff to speed it up.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2014, 01:03:16 PM »
You know them well :chuckle:  :bash:

Hastings has almost never seen any piece of federal land that he doesn’t want to log, or mine, or drill, or turn over to state or private ownership."

Actually Hastings is the prime sponsor of a bill that would create the Manhattan Project National Historical Park in WA and other states under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. So he is not totally anti fed land management.
That was a DIRECT quote of the PI story bigtex
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10633
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #12 on: January 18, 2014, 02:19:42 PM »
You know them well :chuckle:  :bash:

Hastings has almost never seen any piece of federal land that he doesn’t want to log, or mine, or drill, or turn over to state or private ownership."

Actually Hastings is the prime sponsor of a bill that would create the Manhattan Project National Historical Park in WA and other states under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. So he is not totally anti fed land management.
That was a DIRECT quote of the PI story bigtex

I know I saw that after I posted.  :chuckle:

Hastings has introduced several bills to create the new NHP. He even added an amendment to the 2014 2014 National Defense Authorization Act to create the new NHP/

Due to failure of support from the Senate, the expected final 2014 National Defense Authorization Act does not include two House-passed amendments to the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act authored by Congressman Doc Hastings to establish the Manhattan Project National Park. A statement from Congressman Doc Hastings, Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, follows:

“I’m disappointed, but not deterred. To all the advocates for this Park: you’ve given great energy, enthusiasm and expertise to this effort to date, and I know that will continue until our goal is accomplished, which I am confident it will ultimately be."

http://hastings.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=364192

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8826
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2014, 08:42:53 AM »


 AND no editorializing in this fair and balanced reporting......
"Don’t hold your breath.  The bill goes to the House Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash.

Hastings has almost never seen any piece of federal land that he doesn’t want to log, or mine, or drill, or turn over to state or private ownership."


Why Joel Connolly didn't resist his urge to editorialize and stick to a news piece is beyond me.  Very unprofessional in my view

Offline blackdog

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 636
  • Location: Coastal
  • Advocate ..
Re: Wild Olympics
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2014, 09:57:47 AM »
I'm not defending Joel but everything he writes is an "Editorial", his job title is "Editorialist". He does not like our hunting heritage and he is not a "reporter"! Please realize that he will never refrain from editorializing in his editorials.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Willapa Hills 1 Bear by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 10:15:30 PM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 10:14:33 PM]


Yard babies by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:43:51 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:06:11 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 07:33:01 PM]


45 Winchester Magnum by poor_choices
[Yesterday at 07:01:02 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by JKEEN33
[Yesterday at 06:49:08 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 05:34:55 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 03:21:50 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:30:15 AM]


If you've been following.... by timberfaller
[Yesterday at 09:05:13 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by BLH69
[Yesterday at 08:58:57 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by mountainman
[Yesterday at 08:48:35 AM]


1st Quality Deer tag in Washington and its a muzzleloader tag by raydog
[Yesterday at 07:56:07 AM]


2024 deer. Let’s see um! by dreadi
[Yesterday at 12:02:30 AM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 280ackley
[July 01, 2025, 10:22:47 PM]


10 years ago- Now by Ridgerunner
[July 01, 2025, 09:49:05 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal