Free: Contests & Raffles.
I agree with that. I just don't think this bill is the avenue to that end. There are other ways to encourage the FS to do thier job
Why is this necessary? Did you read the bill? It looks as though all NFS lands currently designated as commercial forest land, and capable of producing 20 Cu Ft of forest product (wood) per year would be included... that means essentially all of the NFS lands in NE Washington.No thanks.Why don't we just support NEWFC or some of the groups that are trying to get the FS to cut more trees???
I think the downside is that we are turning a FOREST into a FACTORY... we can keep the same designation and cut more trees. Isn't that the point of the bill, to make the FS cut more trees?IDK what you mean Elkaholic? Why should we make ALL the FS lands into a tree farm? How is that good?
If any of you have received a response back from your Congressperson that happens to be a Democrat, write them back and ask them to explain how they are representing us when the votes were clearly partisan. Remember, all Democratic Congresspersons from Washington voted against the bill; all Republicans voted for it. It appears they are following the commands of the Democratic caucus and NOT representing their constituents.
There are other ways to lead to more trees coming out of the forest.
Healthy forests are managed forests