collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill passing?

Yes
No

Author Topic: WDFW Requested Legislation: Fish and Wildlife Law Enforcement...BILL PASSED  (Read 13521 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
WDFW has requested the legislature approve several measures regarding fish and wildlife law enforcement during the 2014 legislative session which begins in January. Those changes include:

•   Instituting a civil fine of $2,000 for taking a white sturgeon over 65 inches in length
•   Instituting a civil fine of $2,000 for taking a green sturgeon
•   Instituting a civil fine of $500 for possessing a wild salmon or wild steelhead that is protected under the Endangered Species Act

The civil fines are enacted under the same laws for killing big game. A court CANNOT reduce the above fines.

•   All law enforcement officers (outside of WDFW) can enforce fish and wildlife laws and individuals are required to produce for inspection gear, licenses, and game/fish. Currently under law it is a crime to not produce those items for WDFW Officers, but not “ex officio fish and wildlife officers” (big term for non-WDFW Officers enforcing fish and wildlife laws). This law changes that and closes that loophole.

•   Institutes a fine of $500 plus statutory assessments for being too close to an Orca Whale. Current fine is $42 plus statutory assessments which bring the total fine to $87. This is the same for ALL natural resource infractions.

•   Those familiar with federal wildlife laws may know the “Lacey Act” which has several provisions including the prohibition of transporting/possessing fish, wildlife, plants, etc that was taken unlawfully and bringing it across state or international lines. In some areas it also includes bringing it across some federal land areas, even inside the state. WDFW is asking the legislature to create a state gross misdemeanor which would create a state offense of unlawful possession of fish, shellfish, or wildlife taken or possessed in violation of another state’s or country’s laws or regulations.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2014, 09:24:43 AM by bigtex »

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
One thing that jumps out to me is, provided WDFW proves through DNA sampling that the salmon or steelhead are truley wild, and not just un-clipped hatchery fish.

Also if equipment is seized against a hatchery fish, said equip should be returned to owner.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
One thing that jumps out to me is, provided WDFW proves through DNA sampling that the salmon or steelhead are truley wild, and not just un-clipped hatchery fish.

The state law (already in place) adopts the federal regulations as to what is protected and what is not. For salmon and steelhead the "official" term is "naturally spawned." So a problem you may have with DNA is that if a fish doesn't return to the hatchery and does spawn naturally their offspring will not be clipped but may have DNA similar to the hatchery fish. Under federal law, those fish are protected....

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
 :tup:   That takes care of that..........

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8889
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Quote
The civil fines are enacted under the same laws for killing big game. A court CANNOT reduce the above fines.

That is never good

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7224
  • Location: Mukilteo
So I’ll keep releasing all the Tulalip hatchery kings that I catch in areas 9 & 8-2.   :bash:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
Quote
The civil fines are enacted under the same laws for killing big game. A court CANNOT reduce the above fines.

That is never good

Why? You don't like that somebody shoots a buck and gets an automatic $2000 fine? Without that a judge can say $0 and be good for 6 months

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8889
  • Location: the Holocene, man
I trust a judge to look at reason and capability.

Offline hntrspud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 948
  • Location: Snoqualmie
  • Groups: NRA DU RMEF Washington for Wildlife SVEF
I for one am glad that the Orca fine has been increased. The interesting part is, if you follow the laws you dont have to worry about it.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
I trust a judge to look at reason and capability.

The fine is handed down by a judge. The person must be found/plea guilty.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
The interesting part is, if you follow the laws you dont have to worry about it.

Like any law  :tup:

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7224
  • Location: Mukilteo
The interesting part is, if you follow the laws you dont have to worry about it.

Like any law  :tup:

You guys are saying that no one has ever been wrongfully accused or convicted of breaking a law?  I wish that were true. 

Offline hntrspud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 948
  • Location: Snoqualmie
  • Groups: NRA DU RMEF Washington for Wildlife SVEF
I am absolutely not saying that. As with all agencies there is good and bad, but in the vast majority of the cases it is not a false accusation.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
When this bill gets introduced in January we need EVERYONE to call/email their legislator to pass this bill  :twocents:

Offline Daytonite

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 129
When this bill gets introduced in January we need EVERYONE to call/email their legislator to pass this bill  :twocents:

Couldn't agree more :tup:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

One of my Wowzhers by Klickitatsteelie
[Today at 09:00:50 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by lazydrifter
[Today at 08:36:06 PM]


What are you cooking? by JDHasty
[Today at 08:25:09 PM]


Illinois, No Doubter by Birdguy
[Today at 07:14:46 PM]


How to change email? by boneaddict
[Today at 07:11:41 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Schmalzfam
[Today at 05:10:16 PM]


Canning Wild Game by Whitpirate
[Today at 04:24:26 PM]


Big old and heavy by Pathfinder101
[Today at 02:32:30 PM]


Pepper Jack tillimook by Fidelk
[Today at 02:30:19 PM]


Thanksgiving duck hunt by metlhead
[Today at 12:34:23 PM]


What boots? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 10:46:03 AM]


One-Day Approval!!! by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:34:17 AM]


Wowzers by shotguunar
[Today at 10:18:25 AM]


CWD test results 🤤🤫 by baldopepper
[Today at 09:50:23 AM]


High n Dry gear by GWP
[Today at 09:13:20 AM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by b23
[Today at 09:01:46 AM]


Idaho/Montana elk/deer lodges by Hiker82
[Today at 08:49:34 AM]


November 26,02025 Hunt by Delta Duckman
[Today at 07:13:29 AM]


GMU 111 antlered moose advice request by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:20:12 PM]


Big J's Black Friday sale by highside74
[Yesterday at 10:11:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal