collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill passing?

Yes
No

Author Topic: WDFW Requested Legislation: Fish and Wildlife Law Enforcement...BILL PASSED  (Read 13321 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
WDFW has requested the legislature approve several measures regarding fish and wildlife law enforcement during the 2014 legislative session which begins in January. Those changes include:

•   Instituting a civil fine of $2,000 for taking a white sturgeon over 65 inches in length
•   Instituting a civil fine of $2,000 for taking a green sturgeon
•   Instituting a civil fine of $500 for possessing a wild salmon or wild steelhead that is protected under the Endangered Species Act

The civil fines are enacted under the same laws for killing big game. A court CANNOT reduce the above fines.

•   All law enforcement officers (outside of WDFW) can enforce fish and wildlife laws and individuals are required to produce for inspection gear, licenses, and game/fish. Currently under law it is a crime to not produce those items for WDFW Officers, but not “ex officio fish and wildlife officers” (big term for non-WDFW Officers enforcing fish and wildlife laws). This law changes that and closes that loophole.

•   Institutes a fine of $500 plus statutory assessments for being too close to an Orca Whale. Current fine is $42 plus statutory assessments which bring the total fine to $87. This is the same for ALL natural resource infractions.

•   Those familiar with federal wildlife laws may know the “Lacey Act” which has several provisions including the prohibition of transporting/possessing fish, wildlife, plants, etc that was taken unlawfully and bringing it across state or international lines. In some areas it also includes bringing it across some federal land areas, even inside the state. WDFW is asking the legislature to create a state gross misdemeanor which would create a state offense of unlawful possession of fish, shellfish, or wildlife taken or possessed in violation of another state’s or country’s laws or regulations.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2014, 09:24:43 AM by bigtex »

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
One thing that jumps out to me is, provided WDFW proves through DNA sampling that the salmon or steelhead are truley wild, and not just un-clipped hatchery fish.

Also if equipment is seized against a hatchery fish, said equip should be returned to owner.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
One thing that jumps out to me is, provided WDFW proves through DNA sampling that the salmon or steelhead are truley wild, and not just un-clipped hatchery fish.

The state law (already in place) adopts the federal regulations as to what is protected and what is not. For salmon and steelhead the "official" term is "naturally spawned." So a problem you may have with DNA is that if a fish doesn't return to the hatchery and does spawn naturally their offspring will not be clipped but may have DNA similar to the hatchery fish. Under federal law, those fish are protected....

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
 :tup:   That takes care of that..........

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8867
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Quote
The civil fines are enacted under the same laws for killing big game. A court CANNOT reduce the above fines.

That is never good

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7199
  • Location: Mukilteo
So I’ll keep releasing all the Tulalip hatchery kings that I catch in areas 9 & 8-2.   :bash:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Quote
The civil fines are enacted under the same laws for killing big game. A court CANNOT reduce the above fines.

That is never good

Why? You don't like that somebody shoots a buck and gets an automatic $2000 fine? Without that a judge can say $0 and be good for 6 months

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8867
  • Location: the Holocene, man
I trust a judge to look at reason and capability.

Offline hntrspud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 948
  • Location: Snoqualmie
  • Groups: NRA DU RMEF Washington for Wildlife SVEF
I for one am glad that the Orca fine has been increased. The interesting part is, if you follow the laws you dont have to worry about it.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
I trust a judge to look at reason and capability.

The fine is handed down by a judge. The person must be found/plea guilty.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
The interesting part is, if you follow the laws you dont have to worry about it.

Like any law  :tup:

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7199
  • Location: Mukilteo
The interesting part is, if you follow the laws you dont have to worry about it.

Like any law  :tup:

You guys are saying that no one has ever been wrongfully accused or convicted of breaking a law?  I wish that were true. 

Offline hntrspud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 948
  • Location: Snoqualmie
  • Groups: NRA DU RMEF Washington for Wildlife SVEF
I am absolutely not saying that. As with all agencies there is good and bad, but in the vast majority of the cases it is not a false accusation.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
When this bill gets introduced in January we need EVERYONE to call/email their legislator to pass this bill  :twocents:

Offline Daytonite

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 129
When this bill gets introduced in January we need EVERYONE to call/email their legislator to pass this bill  :twocents:

Couldn't agree more :tup:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 deer, let's see em! by hunter399
[Today at 07:20:06 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by EnglishSetter
[Today at 07:05:54 AM]


Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by hunter399
[Today at 06:57:42 AM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by hunter399
[Today at 06:55:37 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Pathfinder101
[Today at 06:46:03 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by vandeman17
[Today at 03:52:30 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 09:54:25 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 09:11:38 PM]


Rock creek gone? Next? by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 09:01:52 PM]


Color phase fox by redi
[Yesterday at 08:58:03 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by Alchase
[Yesterday at 08:47:37 PM]


Selling Pistols and rifles by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 07:02:19 PM]


Possible record bull? by Whitefoot
[Yesterday at 06:32:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 06:16:20 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 04:38:38 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 03:44:09 PM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by Stein
[Yesterday at 03:08:22 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:35:52 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 12:04:23 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by cavemann
[Yesterday at 10:11:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal