collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Harvest not kill?  (Read 55779 times)

Offline stringer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 199
  • Location: Conway
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #180 on: January 12, 2014, 05:54:27 PM »
What if you were to tranquilize it, harvest the hair with your shears, then let it go to grow again?  Or would it die a slow death before it grew it's hair back?  Is there a biologist out there?   Because if it couldn't survive  it would be harvesting and then killing.... inhumane death..  Why not kill it first, then harvest the hair... oh, but I don't kill... so now...  befuddled... torn twixt smiting, smoting, killing, harvesting,  woe is me :'(

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18089
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #181 on: January 12, 2014, 06:08:40 PM »
HDSHOT,

I just hope you know that while several of us poked some fun, we did it in good humor (at least I tried to).

No big deal to have a difference of opinion......   Some of us just get bored and like to poke a little fun.

 Certainly, no offense meant.          :tup:
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #182 on: January 12, 2014, 06:09:52 PM »
Wow! This thread is still alive.  2014 is definitely starting out to be a slow year.     :stirthepot:

Offline stringer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 199
  • Location: Conway
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #183 on: January 12, 2014, 06:17:16 PM »
HDSHOT,

I just hope you know that while several of us poked some fun, we did it in good humor (at least I tried to).

No big deal to have a difference of opinion......   Some of us just get bored and like to poke a little fun.

 Certainly, no offense meant.          :tup:
:yeah:

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #184 on: January 12, 2014, 06:22:15 PM »
It's a full on buzz harvest.
oh I love buzzharvest.....adding to the lexicon of absurdity

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #185 on: January 12, 2014, 06:22:48 PM »
gonna have to shut down this unit,its been over harvested :chuckle:

Offline turkeyfeather

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 5128
  • Location: Stevens County
  • Groups: NWTF
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #186 on: January 12, 2014, 07:21:26 PM »
HDSHOT,

I just hope you know that while several of us poked some fun, we did it in good humor (at least I tried to).

No big deal to have a difference of opinion......   Some of us just get bored and like to poke a little fun.

 Certainly, no offense meant.          :tup:
It's all fun and games till someone cops a 'tude.  :chuckle:
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is who you actually are while your reputation is merely who others think you are.

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 840
  • Location: e wa
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #187 on: February 11, 2014, 10:10:58 AM »
HDSHOT,

I just hope you know that while several of us poked some fun, we did it in good humor (at least I tried to).

No big deal to have a difference of opinion......   Some of us just get bored and like to poke a little fun.

 Certainly, no offense meant.          :tup:

No, just using facts what hunting is about, the hunter who is being roasted on here.  If poking fun at me, just wasting your time, just don't know, or care. Same as if you tell the teacher 2+2=4 and then I bash you for being wrong how would you feel?  Hunters are the first to use conservation but today that means being politically correct.  Having pride in donating money to save habitat to keep our sport alive and well must be trying to be politically correct.  Obvious we have forgotten our history how much hunters have had to conserve from the past to have what we have today and we poke fun at them for that.  If they just killed the way Olympia thinks, we would of had no wildlife decades ago. 

Nothing I can do about it but that is how today's hunters has failed, fooled into thinking what hunters do is just a smoke screen.

 
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #188 on: February 11, 2014, 10:13:19 AM »
Man killed animals for food and shelter long before any PC wishywashy harvest vs. kill debates came out.

If you end somethings life you have killed it. Bottom line.

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 840
  • Location: e wa
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #189 on: February 11, 2014, 03:12:43 PM »
Man killed animals for food and shelter long before any PC wishywashy harvest vs. kill debates came out.

If you end somethings life you have killed it. Bottom line.

We manage whether herd of deer or trees in the forest.  Why does the state even want reports on their animals?  That's right the bottom line is to manage herds.  Not to manage that 1 deer, 1 elk, or 1 bear a hunter legally takes.  Just a basic scale because more animals bagged then herds are healthy and less bagged then herds are low to help set seasons in the future.  But this state seems to use verbage to put out statistics to show X-amount deer killed to the non hunting public to get their heart bleeding.  Sorry my heart won't bleed because hunters have more purpose than that and we should know better.

Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #190 on: February 11, 2014, 03:20:12 PM »
What are you even talking about?


Hunters kill animals. We kill them with bullets fired from guns, arrows from bows.......

Once the animal is killed we harvest the meat, organs, hide, bones....etc.

If you want to start another thread about the states verbage then please, feel free. However, no matter what you do we still kill animals. Hunters have done that since they took a rock and brained the first critter and cooked it up.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #191 on: February 11, 2014, 03:22:54 PM »
Your own words....very first post:

Why is the word kill used because that is a word to describe an illegal act in most cases?  Hunters don't kill, we harvest legal as if the animal was like a berry we pick in the summer as example.     


The word kill is most certainly not used to describe an illegal act in most cases. I killed a fly. I killed a deer. Kill the lights. You are killing me. If anything the word kill is used to describe completely legal acts in most cases.

Offline Skillet

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+43)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 5815
  • Location: Sitka, AK
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #192 on: February 11, 2014, 03:27:52 PM »
Zombie thread of the month.
KABOOM Count - 1

"The ocean is calling, and I must go."

"Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
     - Gordon Lightfoot

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #193 on: February 11, 2014, 03:29:38 PM »
Since I'm on a roll I'll tell you what is wrong with the word harvest. Maybe this will drive home the point that saying harvest does to the act of hunting. When I talk to my son I want him to use the word kill. He isn't harvesting some corn or picking berries with mommy. He is taking a life. He is depriving that animal of its next breath. He is making sure that animal will not see the sun come up again or smell fall in the air. Killing is serious stuff. It is heavy duty and should be taken that way. They day my son says oohh daddy can we harvest a deer will be a sad day.

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: Harvest not kill?
« Reply #194 on: February 11, 2014, 03:35:34 PM »
This is almost as funny as when I've been out hunting and someone asks me if I caught anything.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Today at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Today at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Today at 11:36:36 AM]


Leupold Display fade by Stein
[Today at 10:21:55 AM]


Pocket Carry by birdshooter1189
[Today at 09:21:42 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 09:21:15 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Today at 07:42:37 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Today at 07:19:46 AM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 06:36:49 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Today at 05:36:10 AM]


idaho hunt 1001 by MackDaddy509
[Yesterday at 08:37:03 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 06:40:56 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 06:22:02 PM]


Idaho general deer area 5. by 3nails
[Yesterday at 05:33:03 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal