Free: Contests & Raffles.
With that price range you can get yourself into some great scopes. Unfortunately in-store viewing doesn't do a quality scope justice. I have a Burris fullfield ii 3x9-40; by no means a super nice quality scope, but for the money it was amazing the difference between it and $50-150 scopes. Very pleased with my low light conditions.
For big game rifles I've had 3-9s, 3.5-10s, 4-12s, and a 4.5-16 and have gotten rid of them all. Now I use an FX3 6x42. Why? Cause most of the shots I've taken on game have been somewhere in the 6x area no matter how much magnification I've had. For paper I like lots of power, game not so much.
Quote from: KB88 on November 13, 2013, 08:03:28 AMWith that price range you can get yourself into some great scopes. Unfortunately in-store viewing doesn't do a quality scope justice. I have a Burris fullfield ii 3x9-40; by no means a super nice quality scope, but for the money it was amazing the difference between it and $50-150 scopes. Very pleased with my low light conditions.This.Burris FFII, Bushnell Elite 4200, Nikon Monarch are going to be your best bets in the $200-250 range.If I was spending $500, it wouldn't be on a Leupold.
An average how much does a 3.5x10 leupold vx-3 run? I looked at the sportsman's warehouse website and they are 560.
Rifle scopes are overrated for the vast majority of big game hunting situations. I would get a decent $200 scope and put the savings into high quality binoculars.
Take a look at Vortex scopes also. I have there 3.5-10×50mm Diamondback and there 4-12×40 viper and they are both nice scopes for the money. The Viper actually replaced a Leupold VX3.