collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 338-06  (Read 27327 times)

Offline WA Redneck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 49
Re: 338-06
« Reply #30 on: November 25, 2013, 08:41:00 AM »
Thanks for all the great info.  I love those 185 TSX bullets and that is what I'll stay with.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8825
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: 338-06
« Reply #31 on: November 25, 2013, 09:14:50 AM »
I would think the sst would be a great choice in the slower speeds of the 338-06

Offline woodswalker

  • Curmudgeon in training
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1764
  • Location: on the way to Stevens Pass
    • https://www.facebook.com/Grumpys-Gun-Repair-153675238330367/?ref=br_rs&pnref=lhc
    • Grumpys Gun Repair
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, Ducks Unlimited, RMEF, SRPA WHEIA
Re: 338-06
« Reply #32 on: November 25, 2013, 10:24:11 AM »
I would think the sst would be a great choice in the slower speeds of the 338-06
Or Ballistic Tips... I use them in the Whelen Ackley Improved (WhAckley) and the 8x57 and the 8mm-06.
A Smith & Wesson Beats Four Aces.

Whatta ya mean I can't have one of each?

What we have here is...Washington Department of NO Fish and WATCHABLE Wildlife.
 
WDFW is going farther and farther backwards....we need FISH AND GAME back!

Offline pd

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 2573
  • Location: Seattle?
Re: 338-06
« Reply #33 on: November 25, 2013, 11:07:43 AM »

Also a comparison pic of the 30-06 vs 338-06 Imp. and 35 Whelen Imp.



Hey Guys,

Please don't flame me on this.  This is a very interesting thread, and I would would really like to know why all the effort is put into the .338-06, when the cartridge is so similar to the .30-06.  I am being serious here, because I just don't know why you would do this.

I completely understand buying guns (or, making them) "just because I want to."  I also do that.  But if there is a much more important reason, please educate me.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8825
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: 338-06
« Reply #34 on: November 25, 2013, 11:10:05 AM »

Also a comparison pic of the 30-06 vs 338-06 Imp. and 35 Whelen Imp.



Hey Guys,

Please don't flame me on this.  This is a very interesting thread, and I would would really like to know why all the effort is put into the .338-06, when the cartridge is so similar to the .30-06.  I am being serious here, because I just don't know why you would do this.

I completely understand buying guns (or, making them) "just because I want to."  I also do that.  But if there is a much more important reason, please educate me.


gun junkies I guess , 30-06 just don't get in my truck !

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: 338-06
« Reply #35 on: November 25, 2013, 11:14:39 AM »

Also a comparison pic of the 30-06 vs 338-06 Imp. and 35 Whelen Imp.



Hey Guys,

Please don't flame me on this.  This is a very interesting thread, and I would would really like to know why all the effort is put into the .338-06, when the cartridge is so similar to the .30-06.  I am being serious here, because I just don't know why you would do this.

I completely understand buying guns (or, making them) "just because I want to."  I also do that.  But if there is a much more important reason, please educate me.
220 grain bullets are roughly the max most consider the 30-06 with .30 cal to spin and handle correctly.  the 338 can go up to 300 grain with standard twist barrels.

Offline WA Redneck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 49
Re: 338-06
« Reply #36 on: November 25, 2013, 11:51:28 AM »
PD,


Offline WA Redneck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 49
Re: 338-06
« Reply #37 on: November 25, 2013, 11:56:08 AM »
Let's try this again.  I got mine because in the thick brushy areas that I often times hunt, I wanted something that would offer a little bigger hole in and out than my 270 or 30-06.  I thought about the 35 Whelen, 358, 338-06 and the 338 Federal.  Guess which one came along first.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8825
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: 338-06
« Reply #38 on: November 25, 2013, 01:01:33 PM »
225 sst  :tup: big holes rule ! I like the idea of the energy getting spent in the animal some of the ultras just blow right through.

Offline Yondering

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 504
  • Location: Sedro Woolley
Re: 338-06
« Reply #39 on: November 25, 2013, 03:50:21 PM »

Hey Guys,

Please don't flame me on this.  This is a very interesting thread, and I would would really like to know why all the effort is put into the .338-06, when the cartridge is so similar to the .30-06.  I am being serious here, because I just don't know why you would do this.

I completely understand buying guns (or, making them) "just because I want to."  I also do that.  But if there is a much more important reason, please educate me.

I hunt with the Whelen pictured above, because it just hits harder than the 30-06, and I like that. (don't confuse "like" or "want" with "need") The 338-06 is somewhere in the middle; the appeal is that it still hits harder than the .30 cal, with heavier bullets, but without sacrificing much range.

I don't think any of it is about "need"; just personal preference. Some guys like bigger guns. I considered hunting whitetail with my .458 Win Mag, just because, although I never got around to it.

Offline pd

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 2573
  • Location: Seattle?
Re: 338-06
« Reply #40 on: November 25, 2013, 05:04:52 PM »
Let's try this again.  I got mine because in the thick brushy areas that I often times hunt, I wanted something that would offer a little bigger hole in and out than my 270 or 30-06.  I thought about the 35 Whelen, 358, 338-06 and the 338 Federal.  Guess which one came along first.

I completely understand your (and Yonderling's) response.  I, too, hunt in the nasty brush of the wet side, and I face the same problem.  In my case, poor eyesight limits my ability to see INTO the brush, but nonetheless, your logic makes sense to me.

Good hunting!
Si vis pacem, para bellum

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

My Wenaha bull by Centaur
[Today at 02:22:16 PM]


Pouge unit help by Buzzsaw461
[Today at 02:14:36 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by huntnphool
[Today at 01:19:05 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 11:33:03 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by ganghis
[Today at 10:04:09 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Sundance
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Shooter4
[Today at 08:10:30 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:06:15 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 07:59:15 AM]


New scope or not? by Sneaky
[Today at 07:02:05 AM]


Making memories by boneaddict
[Today at 06:17:16 AM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Threewolves
[Today at 04:01:56 AM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:17:51 PM]


Idaho unit 10A by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:44:27 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 08:32:50 PM]


Grizzly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:38:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM]


Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:13:04 PM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:27:11 PM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:16:30 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal