collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle  (Read 25032 times)

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #45 on: November 27, 2013, 06:30:04 AM »
I just like the 140's and 150's over the 100's for deer that's the main reason i'd go with the 270. plenty of animals killed with a 243 but I've also seen the little bullet go in and rattle around taking it's sweet time to put the critter down. for a kid I like shoot and flop shots .

Offline arees

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 775
  • Location: Redmond, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, SCI, NRA
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #46 on: November 27, 2013, 07:12:22 AM »
My 9 year old son shoots a left handed 270.  We were lucky enough to be given an extra stock for the rifle so we cut the original down to his size.  He hand loads for the rifle using gas checked lead bullets and Trailboss powder.  This lets us load it to as little recoil as we want and he can not fit an unsafe amount of powder in the shell.

He can shoot lots of plinking loads, shoot managed recoil loads on game and he will have the same rifle with a full size stock when he grows up.  For us it is a perfect solution.

Now we just need a deer that will stand around for a couple minutes longer.
We need a crusade for the children, a children's crusade.

Offline lhrbull

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 365
  • Groups: wafsf mdf sci
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #47 on: November 27, 2013, 01:57:46 PM »
started my 12 year old daughter  out with a 257 roberts now at 5' 4'' she shoots a Rem 280 with a muzzle brake. if i would could have found one at the time i would have started her on a 257 weatherby

Offline splitshot

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2054
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #48 on: December 07, 2013, 10:05:51 PM »
  7 mm-08, go for it if you are small.  if you are big go for a 338 all the way.   mike w

Offline GEARHEAD

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1783
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #49 on: December 07, 2013, 10:45:30 PM »
7mm-08........recoil like a 243, yet can throw a 140 gr bullet at 3000 fps, will take deer and elk....i've taken many deer, all the way out to 458 with mine, many deer.

Offline WDFW Hates ME!!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1932
  • Location: SW Washington
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #50 on: December 07, 2013, 11:11:13 PM »
I bought my boy a 270 when he was 10. He shot the managed recoil rounds for 3 years, and he shot his first elk with 130 grain normal recoil rounds. I like shooting the 270, feels like a 22 compared to my 300. I can't tell you what to buy but I really like the 270 due to the availability of rounds and it is fun to shoot
*censored* happens when you party naked!!!

IBEW Local 125

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #52 on: December 07, 2013, 11:44:33 PM »
7mm-08........recoil like a 243, yet can throw a 140 gr bullet at 3000 fps, will take deer and elk....i've taken many deer, all the way out to 458 with mine, many deer.
Just FYI for the OP, the .243, 7mm-08 and .308 all use the same .308 case. The 7mm-08 is necked down to the 7mm (.284) bullet and the .243 is necked down to the .243 or 6mm bullet. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline OLYTAX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 25
  • Location: NORTH BEND, WA
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #53 on: December 11, 2013, 02:55:17 PM »
I am a died in the wool 30 caliber fan and user........but I have taken the 243 to Africa (plains game), shot Caribou in Canada and taken multiple deer with the caliber........absolutely love it and its accurate

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #54 on: December 11, 2013, 03:23:14 PM »
Both very good cals .... I started out with a .243 and moved up to a .270 ...would never ever get rid of either ....I now also own a 7mm-08 and being as hard headed as I am about the .243 and .270 I thought I would never brake down and buy another rifle ..Since then I have bought a 25-06 and then a 7mm-08 In my opinion if you own any of the 4 for doing good ....IF I was buying my kid a new rifle and was planning on him hunting deer elk and bear I would go with the 7mm-08 ...A lot of different bullets to load for it and for what you will be hunting ... :tup:  :twocents:

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10933
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #55 on: December 11, 2013, 03:42:29 PM »
7mm-08 all the way!!
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3195
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #56 on: December 11, 2013, 04:56:53 PM »
7mm-08 gets my vote :tup:

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39191
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #57 on: December 11, 2013, 05:09:42 PM »
Funny that the question was "243 or 270" yet people are "voting" for the 7/08. It's not one of the options!   :chuckle:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #58 on: December 11, 2013, 05:20:35 PM »
I probably would have voted 7/08 if the question was:   "243 vs. 7/08 vs. 270"    :twocents:

May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline Jingles

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3868
  • Location: Methow Valley 98862
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #59 on: December 11, 2013, 05:26:26 PM »
I will jump in here and bring up a little more to consider IMO. If you are considering the 270 you might as well look at the 30-06 because they both use the same basic brass. Break out a reloading manual and look at the 2 side by side. Personally if purchasing for deer (mule, WT, BT), coyotes, Lions,I'd go with the 243 especially for a younger smaller framed hunter, Don't ruin their experience with to much gun. Emphasize accuracy rather than bigger is better.  I killed my 375 pound black bear with a 243 and would not hesitate to use the same gun for elk with good shot placement.  Those that need 475 H&H magnums for black bear and similar sized game are probably lousy shots to begin with or at least the ones you see at the range that figure 4 shots on a 6 inch pie plate at 100 yards is good enough because they are shooting their 300RM or RUM instead of concentrating on Accuracy
HMC/USN/RET
1969 -1990
The comments of this poster do not reflect the opinions of HUNTWA Administrators or Moderators unless they so state.

The duty of a Patriot is to protect his country from it's government

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Goose hunting with vice grips by Night goat
[Today at 08:46:21 AM]


Drew Quality by Ridgerunner
[Today at 08:32:55 AM]


Youth Cow Tag by jhouckwsu
[Today at 07:16:57 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Today at 05:58:49 AM]


People on Cams by hunter399
[Today at 05:56:38 AM]


Norway pass Elk by furbearer365
[Today at 05:46:12 AM]


Norway Pass Bull by High Climber
[Yesterday at 09:23:10 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by IDWAHunt
[Yesterday at 07:54:08 PM]


Steel Targets??? by bowman
[Yesterday at 07:41:07 PM]


Is FS70 open? by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 06:08:08 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 04:24:08 PM]


Idaho unit 76 cow elk Oct 25 to Nov 15 by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 02:11:35 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:34:16 AM]


No trespassing, hunting, fishing signs posted along Skykomish river by jackelope
[Yesterday at 10:11:26 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 09:55:59 AM]


2025 OILS! by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 09:14:25 AM]


Looking for English Pointer pup (Elhew and/or Guard Rail lines) by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 07:22:10 AM]


Buying pheasants for training by trapp01
[June 14, 2025, 08:44:40 PM]


Mt. Spokane North Moose by Farmer72
[June 14, 2025, 08:12:24 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal