collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?  (Read 1887 times)

Offline AWS

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1838
Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« on: November 29, 2013, 12:21:20 PM »
Every year I see bigger more powerful shot shells hitting the store shelves, Blackcloud, Blindside, Faststeel etc.  Do we need them, are they doing what they claim or are we trying to make up for skill and experience with technology like we have with inline MZLs and compound bows.

When I was first required to use steel in the late 1970's we used 1 oz of slow 4's and they worked as well as the 7.5 and 5 lead we were using for ducks.  Over the years I've fallen into the bigger is better trap, slowly moving to 1 3/8oz of 2's and then to faster and faster loads .  Funny for all the advances in ammo I found myself shooting more shells for the same number of birds and having more cripples to swat on the water.  I attributed to advancing age and lack of practice( used to shoot competitive International Skeet until I had cataract surgery).

A couple years ago I decided to take some old guns out hunting just for fun.  They were 2.5" chambered hammer guns using very light loaded shells around 13/16 oz of soft nontoxic shells at 1200 fps.  Surprise I was killing more birds and using less ammo.
This season I added a 20ga SxS and am finding that 7/8oz steel 4's are doing great.

I think that the whole reason for having a great season is that I'm setting up for better shoots and passing on marginal birds and hope that they will work back to the decoys.  I hunt public lands and try very hard to hunt areas that others don't hunt and hunt a lot of different places so the ducks don't quit using the areas.

The past two hunts have produced 6 ducks and 2 geese with 10 shells from one of my 2.5" hammer shotguns using less than a dz decoys, and I'm having fun.
After the first shot the rest are just noise.

Make mine a Minaska

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21742
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2013, 12:31:50 PM »
"Bigger, Faster, Stronger, Louder"

"Bigger is better. It's not complicated."

Magnumania. It sells better, not necessarily kills better.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Heredoggydoggy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5041
  • Location: Wenatchee
  • Team I'M TOO OLD FOR THIS $H!T !
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2013, 12:33:41 PM »
It's like the government does--if something doesn't work, throw more money at it!  In your case, if you can't hit the ducks, throw more shot at them!  :chuckle:
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.

When Bernie Madoff did it, it's called a "Ponzi Scheme"
When Government does it, it's called "Social Security"

Offline Bill W

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1942
  • Location: Moses Lake
  • Groups: NRA, CBA
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2013, 12:39:53 PM »
I know that 40 years ago I favored the heaviest loads I could use for ducks.  Then my shooting got better and I learned the issue wasn't the payload but getting the target in the center of the pattern.   Today I choose 1 ounce loads going 1200 fps and if the target/duck/quail is in the pattern I hit it.  If it's not I miss.

Unless it's turkeys I don't really see the need for 3 1/2 inch 12 gauge ammo.

Offline snowshoes22

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 705
  • Location: Grant County
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2013, 01:35:48 PM »
This has been on my mind lately also. Back when I first started hunting waterfowl we shot 2 3/4" #4's for ducks and geese. The geese folded up just fine.
"I'd rather have a slow hit than a fast miss"

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9120
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2013, 02:27:50 PM »
First off we started using lead in the late 80's.  Speed up to a certain speed is needed for ducks.  If your 10-15 yards a 1oz at 1,200 fps is probably fine if they are 25-45 yards your pushing birds and wounding them.  The steel peters out a lot sooner than the lead does or did.
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Offline 270Shooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3828
  • Location: Yakima
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2013, 02:40:28 PM »
I like the fast 3" steel shells at about 1550 fps. I'm  shooting them for pheasants too. And where I hunt for ducks you are usually just trying to traffic them so real close shooting Is not very normal. I have shot a lot of ducks at 45-55 yards because I can and sometimes it's all the ducks give you.

Offline BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2417
  • Location: Yelm
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2013, 03:04:22 PM »
i've been using  2.75" 1 1/8oz #2 steel loads this year, as i got a great deal on some cases.  i've found that they kill as well as the higher velocity stuff i've shot in the past, as long as i can hit them.  that's the kicker right there...i miss just as many passing ducks as i did with more expensive shells.
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline AWS

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1838
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2013, 03:53:12 PM »
h20watrfowler

I'm originally from MN and there we went steel in the 1970's(76 or 77) until Federal brought out steel loads for other than 12ga in 83 we could use lead in sub gauges and MZL.  We just switched to steel no problem.

Maybe I should change my handle to "Luddite"

After the first shot the rest are just noise.

Make mine a Minaska

Offline Bill W

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1942
  • Location: Moses Lake
  • Groups: NRA, CBA
Re: Are we trying to cure a problem that isn't?
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2013, 09:09:06 AM »
First off we started using lead in the late 80's.  Speed up to a certain speed is needed for ducks.  If your 10-15 yards a 1oz at 1,200 fps is probably fine if they are 25-45 yards your pushing birds and wounding them.  The steel peters out a lot sooner than the lead does or did.

If 1200 fps steel only worked out to 15 yards the ammo manufactures wouldn't get many sold.  It works out to 35-40 yards and depending on a person's style of hunting/decoying may prove satisfactory. Tom Roster's studies do indicate speed kills but the target needs to be in the pattern first.

My opinion is only on ducks.   I wholeheartedly agree with "speed" for geese.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bow mount trolling motors by GWP
[Today at 07:32:25 AM]


Nevada guide draw Mule Deer by High Climber
[Today at 07:18:34 AM]


Anterless 1334 muzzle loader by Bendejo
[Today at 07:17:52 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Today at 07:10:20 AM]


2025 Draw Results by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:02:27 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 06:27:17 AM]


SE raffle tags holder by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:39:57 AM]


11th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Today at 12:27:18 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by high_hunter
[Today at 12:21:33 AM]


Ritzville Rifle Buck - GMU 284 by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 11:49:16 PM]


Antlerless Moose more than once? by shootem
[Yesterday at 11:25:51 PM]


Nooksack Muzzleloader Bull Tag by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:42:24 PM]


My wife drew quality deer DESERT rifle 10/18-10/26!!!!! by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:17:15 PM]


Palouse buck deer by blumtnelkndeer
[Yesterday at 10:14:00 PM]


Drew Quality by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 09:34:00 PM]


Quality Swakane by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 09:09:17 PM]


Observatory quality bull rifle by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 09:00:02 PM]


A little Martini Cadet varmint rifle I have been working on by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 08:43:33 PM]


Pogue Quality by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 08:38:35 PM]


2025 OILS! by HUNTNORTHWEST
[Yesterday at 07:46:27 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal