collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?  (Read 8478 times)

Offline huntrights

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1701
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #15 on: December 25, 2013, 04:01:55 PM »
I you haven't seen this yet, it is worth watching.

Richard Mack: The Untouchable Bill of Rights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4ygEk7lvvg


Here is something else to ponder:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_state


« Last Edit: December 27, 2013, 10:41:53 PM by huntrights »

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #16 on: December 27, 2013, 03:44:55 PM »
When the sheriff is ordered to go door to door and confiscate all 870 shotguns, will you welcome and support him because he is upholding "the law"?

The Sheriff wouldn't be ordered by the president. The only officers the president has authority over is the federal LEOs.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21759
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #17 on: December 27, 2013, 04:01:20 PM »
When the sheriff is ordered to go door to door and confiscate all 870 shotguns, will you welcome and support him because he is upholding "the law"?

The Sheriff wouldn't be ordered by the president. The only officers the president has authority over is the federal LEOs.
I didn't make any reference to the president.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25041
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #18 on: December 27, 2013, 05:29:09 PM »
Promises and laws are ONLY as good as you ability to enforce them. Enforcements is a one way street from the feds down. When was the last time you have heard of a Sheriff arresting and holding a federal agent? I bet you can point to several where the Fed has Arrested and held a Sheriff.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38530
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2013, 04:09:36 AM »
The current administration and congress have continually degraded and overridden our constitutional rights, slowly more and more people are waking up to this fact. My vote has and will continue to go to those running for office who stand by our constitution. People around the world are in disbelief as they watch Americans throw away the greatest system and document ever created.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38530
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2013, 04:10:53 AM »
The current administration and congress have continually degraded and overridden our constitutional rights, slowly more and more people are waking up to this fact. My vote has and will continue to go to those running for office who stand by our constitution. People around the world are in disbelief as they watch Americans complacently throw away the greatest system and document ever created.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2013, 11:06:28 AM »
When was the last time you have heard of a Sheriff arresting and holding a federal agent? I bet you can point to several where the Fed has Arrested and held a Sheriff.

And this is what I love about some of these sheriff's. The gun control issues brought it to the forefront, but Sheriff's for probably 30 years now have been threatening to arrest BLM and Forest Service Officers. For the most part this has been in Utah, as well as some parts of Nevada and then every once in awhile you hear about a random sheriff in California, Colorado, and Oregon saying it.

It is always something along the lines of "the feds cant enforce the state law without my authority, and if they do I will arrest them" well that's false. Congress has passed a bill for every land management agency that allows those agencies to create their own regulations. Very similar to how WDFW, DNR, Parks can create their own regulations for their lands. Well these land management agencies create their own regulations for their lands, and in some cases say it is unlawful to violate certain state laws (such as fish and wildlife, traffic, etc). Congress gave these agencies the authority to create those regulations and the Supreme Court has upheld that authority. But then these Sheriff's will say that Congress themselves didn't approve of BLM adopting state traffic laws, true, but Congress did give BLM the authority to create the regulations that apply to their lands. It would be like saying fishing seasons aren't lawful because they aren't set by the legislature, true, but the legislature gives the WDFW Commission the authority to adopt/create fishing seasons. And this is why any lawsuit by a sheriff is quickly dismissed.

How many BLM and Forest Service Officers have been arrested by a Sheriff for doing their federal duties? ZERO. It is all talk to get the votes  :twocents:

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2013, 11:18:53 AM »
The current administration and congress have continually degraded and overridden our constitutional rights, slowly more and more people are waking up to this fact. My vote has and will continue to go to those running for office who stand by our constitution. People around the world are in disbelief as they watch Americans throw away the greatest system and document ever created.
:yeah: And so many agree with it :dunno:

 respectfully bigtex.............. boiling a live frog..........BABY steps is the only way 
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38530
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #23 on: December 28, 2013, 11:23:57 AM »
I'm sure bigtex is correct about the law, but I'm voting for the politicians who stand with our constitution and the local people. In Idaho Governor Otter was elected because he said he wanted to notch the first wolf tag. He later restricted state F&G from giving information to USFWS about wolf poachers. His rule stood and he was reelected, Idaho is also hunting wolves, wished he was governor of Washington.  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25041
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2013, 07:07:31 PM »
I personally think there is a big showdown coming Feds Vs States rights. There is a HUGE difference between being NON cooperative with the feds and Laying your hands on one. I am all for sending the message that the County/ State will not put up with Federal BS. It does however make you look weak if you write checks you cant cash.

With the attitude of our State Gov i don't think Sheriffs can get a way with ANY kind of power Play. I bet they MAY in Utah if the state is backing a Sheriffs swat team.   I think it would be REALLY bad if we resorted to banana republic version of politics where i seize your lieutenants and you seize mine to score points. I don't know ANY State or Sheriffs Deputy that wants to be the one to make an armed arrest of a federal agent.

I do think that moving into states/counties of like minded individuals will be even more important as time goes on. If a state and/or a County has NO interest in enforcing/complying with Federal laws then it will be a lot easier to  get away with it on a personal level.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Windwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 1287
  • Location: Whidbey Island
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #25 on: December 29, 2013, 12:21:51 PM »
 More along those lines-

Arizona Sheriffs Smack Down Feds Over UnConstitutional Demands regarding Public Land

As the saying goes, “along with tremendous power comes tremendous responsibility.”  I cannot think of any person in public service who fits that saying more than a county sheriff.  However, the major networks have spent many years brainwashing the populace into thinking that Federal Agents are the top cops.

How many times have you seen a cop show on TV where the Feds show up, flash their badge and relieve the local sheriff? Then, local sheriff storms off in frustration because the Feds took over the case.  That, good people, is brainwashing.

What many people are unaware of is that your sheriff is the top law enforcement official in your county.  He or She has jurisdiction, even over the Feds.  There are many people, with whom I have spoken, who believe that the only chance that this country has is for good, honest sheriffs to stand up and assert their power.  Perhaps not a silver bullet, but if every sheriff of every county found their constitutional spine, it would set the Feds plan of dominating the population back 25 years.

The first thing that we could do is kick the Feds off of our lands.  But, I digress.

In Arizona, the Arizona Sheriffs Association is asserting their power over the Feds… or at least their power not to comply.  When the Feds “ruled by decree” that any trailers left in the National Forest in AZ would be towed if left more than 72 hours, the ASA shot back. 
Read ASA resolution: http://cdn.freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2013-Sheriffs-Resolution-AZ-copy.pdf

The document bears the signature of ASA President Joseph Dedman, Jr. and it concludes with the following resolve:

That the Arizona Sheriffs are opposed to the policies of the Coconino, Kaibab, and Prescott National Forests limiting the parking of trailers on National Forests limiting the parking of trailers on National Forests to a 72 hours period during hunting season and will not enforce any federal government regulation imposed on our citizens depriving them of their right to utilize their public lands.

Take note of this resolution and hold your own county sheriff to the same Constitutional standards that the ASA have adopted for themselves.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/arizona-sheriffs-smack-feds-unconstitutional-demands-regarding-public-land/#IC3A3p5euj2JsiLX.99
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it." -- Tom Paine
The hour is fast approaching, on which the Honor, Success and safety of our bleeding Country depends

Offline huntrights

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1701
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #26 on: December 29, 2013, 04:17:39 PM »
 :twocents: It may be a bit long, but this is a good discussion.

This is an excellent discussion that should be happening around the country.  It is a discussion that is happening because of the tidal wave of anti-gun legislation we recently experienced and continue to experience.  Much of this legislation is obviously on the fine line between Constitutional and unconstitutional.  Frankly, any legislators that insist on continuously pushing Constitutional boundaries to see what they can get away with should be fired ASAP.  Their job is to protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed to all Americans by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

A typical Oath of Office is shown below.  Some oaths may include references to state constitutions and statutes, but the basic content and oath/promise to the People is the same.  These aren’t just words that are stated when an elected official/representative/President takes office; it is their solemn oath and promise to their constituency.  They cannot take that Oath of Office and then do whatever they wish to do.  If they will not uphold their Oath of Office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, they should be removed from their position.

Typical Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Here is a question to ponder:

Who are the guardians of our rights and freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights if not our elected representatives and officials that swore an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution?

It seems that many people have become very cavalier, apathetic, and complacent about the rights and freedoms we enjoy in this country.  Our rights and freedoms came at great cost; to allow them to be chipped away a little at a time by those with Socialist leanings or worse should be very troubling to all Americans.  It isn’t just our gun rights; we are seeing violations of private property rights, more restrictions on access to our public lands, more and more regulations and laws passed and imposed on us that control and restrict nearly every aspect of our lives.

Although it was implied earlier that “… any lawsuit by a sheriff is quickly dismissed”, we should note that Sheriffs can file law suits and they have been successful.  A notable case was the one involving Sheriff Richard Mack and Chief Law Enforcement Officer Jay Printz; they won their case in the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printz_v._United_States

“Petitioners Jay Printz and Richard Mack, the Chief Law Enforcement Officers for Ravalli County, Montana, and Graham County, Arizona, represented by Stephen Halbrook and David T. Hardy respectively, filed separate actions challenging the constitutionality of the Brady Act's interim provisions. They objected to the use of congressional action to compel state officers to execute Federal law.”

“The majority of five justices ruled that the interim provisions of the Brady Bill are unconstitutional. In his opinion, Justice Scalia states that, although there is no constitutional text precisely responding to the challenge, an answer can be found “in historical understanding and practice, the structure of the Constitution, and in the jurisprudence of this Court.””


A significant point made by Sheriff Richard Mack in some of his public communications was that individuals typically do not have the time or resources to fight the legal battles against laws that may be unconstitutional; although, individuals are most affected by these laws.

Here is that question again:

Who are the guardians of our rights and freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights if not our elected representatives and officials that swore an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution?

What happened to the rights and freedoms of the citizens in Nazi Germany?  They were people that were no different than all of us.  Think about it.

Since we, as individuals, typically do not have the time or resources to fight the very significant legal battles over the constitutionality of the many unnecessary and repressive anti-gun laws, who do we turn to?  We should be able to depend on, and trust our elected officials/representatives/President to uphold their Oath of Office to ensure we are not subjected to such questionable laws.  That dependency and trust seems to be in question in light of recent assaults on our rights and freedoms.

For example, below is a link to an article about some very unconstitutional legislation that was being pushed in Washington State earlier in 2013:

Sheriffs can inspect homes for safe gun storage in Washington State under Democratic weapon bill
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/19/democrats-gun-bill-lets-washington-state-sheriffs-/

Do the citizens of this country have to be subjected to unconstitutional laws until someone or some organization that believes in the Constitution and Bill of Rights steps forward to take on the very expensive and time-consuming task of challenging such laws?  We should never be placed in this position.

A good way to correct this growing problem of threats to our rights and freedoms is to vote only for officials, representatives, and a President that will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and Bill of Rights per their Oath of Office.  Regardless of their party affiliation, if they will not uphold their Oath of Office, Do not vote for them!

In the meantime, we are faced with many court battles that will challenge the constitutionality of many anti-gun laws that were unfortunately passed in an emotional flurry brought on by the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut.  Elected representatives from the President on down to local Commissioners and City Councils that had any anti-gun sentiment took advantage of the emotional pain felt at a national level and pushed every bit of anti-gun legislation and regulations they could squeeze in.  The very well-orchestrated assaults on our right to keep and bear arms at the national, state, and local levels were, and continue to be a travesty within the executive, legislative, and regulatory bodies of this country.  Vote the perpetrators out of office!

Please join and support the organizations that will fight these legal battles for us.  A few of the primary organizations are listed below:

National Rifle Association (NRA)
http://home.nra.org/
https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp
 

Second Amendment Foundation (SAF)
http://www.saf.org/
http://www.saf.org/default.asp?p=safdonation


Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA)
http://www.ccrkba.org/
http://www.ccrkba.org/?page_id=3252


U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA)
http://www.ussportsmen.org/

Note: To use the online “Join” webpage, you will need to allow all cookies.
http://www.ussportsmen.org/join/individual-membership/

Gun Owners of America (GOA)
http://gunowners.org/
http://gunowners.co/new-annual-membership


Safari Club International (SCI)
http://www.scifirstforhunters.org/home/
http://member.scifirstforhunters.org/join/


National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF)
http://www.nssf.org/
http://www.nssf.org/join/


Freedom Foundation
http://myfreedomfoundation.com/
https://donate.myfreedomfoundation.com/
 
« Last Edit: December 30, 2013, 09:11:25 AM by huntrights »

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #27 on: December 29, 2013, 04:31:33 PM »
More along those lines-

Arizona Sheriffs Smack Down Feds Over UnConstitutional Demands regarding Public Land

As the saying goes, “along with tremendous power comes tremendous responsibility.”  I cannot think of any person in public service who fits that saying more than a county sheriff.  However, the major networks have spent many years brainwashing the populace into thinking that Federal Agents are the top cops.

How many times have you seen a cop show on TV where the Feds show up, flash their badge and relieve the local sheriff? Then, local sheriff storms off in frustration because the Feds took over the case.  That, good people, is brainwashing.

What many people are unaware of is that your sheriff is the top law enforcement official in your county.  He or She has jurisdiction, even over the Feds.  There are many people, with whom I have spoken, who believe that the only chance that this country has is for good, honest sheriffs to stand up and assert their power.  Perhaps not a silver bullet, but if every sheriff of every county found their constitutional spine, it would set the Feds plan of dominating the population back 25 years.

The first thing that we could do is kick the Feds off of our lands.  But, I digress.

In Arizona, the Arizona Sheriffs Association is asserting their power over the Feds… or at least their power not to comply.  When the Feds “ruled by decree” that any trailers left in the National Forest in AZ would be towed if left more than 72 hours, the ASA shot back. 
Read ASA resolution: http://cdn.freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2013-Sheriffs-Resolution-AZ-copy.pdf

The document bears the signature of ASA President Joseph Dedman, Jr. and it concludes with the following resolve:

That the Arizona Sheriffs are opposed to the policies of the Coconino, Kaibab, and Prescott National Forests limiting the parking of trailers on National Forests limiting the parking of trailers on National Forests to a 72 hours period during hunting season and will not enforce any federal government regulation imposed on our citizens depriving them of their right to utilize their public lands.

Take note of this resolution and hold your own county sheriff to the same Constitutional standards that the ASA have adopted for themselves.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/arizona-sheriffs-smack-feds-unconstitutional-demands-regarding-public-land/#IC3A3p5euj2JsiLX.99
:yeah: :yeah: :yeah: :tup: :yeah:
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #28 on: December 29, 2013, 04:43:13 PM »
I doubt the feds really care what the ASA feels about the Forest Service's decision.  Regardless of my personal thoughts on the USFS decision, it is not up the local sheriff's office to enforce the decision unless they are under contract with the USFS to provide law enforcement services.  If they were, and chose not to, that's their call.

You guys need to realize some very simple and important distinctions here.  A sheriff does not have power over the feds when it comes to enforcing federal law.  The feds don't have power over the sheriff enforcing state or county law. 

And, it is not up the sheriff to interpret the constitutionality of a law.  That is up to the appellate courts.  Just like a sheriff cannot write law, that is up to the state legislature.  For one to try and encroach upon the others role is as unconstitutional is it comes. :twocents:
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Kootenai County Sheriff's position -- What do you think of it?
« Reply #29 on: December 29, 2013, 05:06:22 PM »
I doubt the feds really care what the ASA feels about the Forest Service's decision.  Regardless of my personal thoughts on the USFS decision, it is not up the local sheriff's office to enforce the decision unless they are under contract with the USFS to provide law enforcement services.  If they were, and chose not to, that's their call.

You guys need to realize some very simple and important distinctions here.  A sheriff does not have power over the feds when it comes to enforcing federal law.  The feds don't have power over the sheriff enforcing state or county law. 

And, it is not up the sheriff to interpret the constitutionality of a law.  That is up to the appellate courts.  Just like a sheriff cannot write law, that is up to the state legislature.  For one to try and encroach upon the others role is as unconstitutional is it comes. :twocents:

 :yeah:
Couldn't have said it better myself.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Nevada bull hunt 2025 by JakeLand
[Today at 08:13:09 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:30:35 AM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:52:44 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


Bear behavior by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:36:32 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:09:14 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 06:30:54 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 01:52:01 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Yesterday at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Yesterday at 01:01:22 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 11:12:46 AM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 11:07:43 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 08:44:37 AM]


Velvet by Brute
[Yesterday at 08:37:08 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal