collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control  (Read 5511 times)

Offline rbinhood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 24
  • Location: Wisconsin
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #30 on: January 06, 2014, 08:33:10 PM »
Elkaholic, you are right, it appears the Nazi comparisons were started by ricochet. I stand corrected if you are disavowing comparing liberals to Nazis?

Offline TONTO

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1018
  • Location: Longview,WA
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #31 on: January 06, 2014, 10:29:20 PM »

I disagree that the Second Amendment, or the Constitution, for that matter, belong to one political party, faction, or group, although several seem to think they own it. People have a right to disagree with your viewpoints.

 I do agree, the Constitution, including the Second Amendment, dosen't belong to one party, it belong's to "WE THE PEOPLE" and niether party should think they should be able to change it. As far as the NRA being a tool for one party, the NRA does what it does and that is fight for our constitution and 2nd amendment rights, thing is, I only see one party trying to destroy those at every opportunity.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #32 on: January 07, 2014, 08:29:58 AM »
Elkaholic, you are right, it appears the Nazi comparisons were started by ricochet. I stand corrected if you are disavowing comparing liberals to Nazis?
Stupid in large numbers is VERY bad

« Last Edit: January 07, 2014, 08:38:28 AM by Elkaholic daWg »
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline deltaops

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 721
  • Location: Bonney Lake, WA
  • “Heads” I win, “Tails” you lose!
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #33 on: January 07, 2014, 12:45:03 PM »
Some people just do not see it coming.

I have a friend who is in the military, he hasn't worn civilian clothes in about 5 years. We have discussions about the president And the office taking our firearms away. It is never a if with him, it is always when.

Slowly it is being imbedded into peoples heads that we do not need firearms. It is trickling down to our children. If we continue to let it happen, it will happen, it is just a matter of when.

If you can not see it happening then you are either for it or you have not woken up yet.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #34 on: January 07, 2014, 04:36:34 PM »
Some people just do not see it coming.

I have a friend who is in the military, he hasn't worn civilian clothes in about 5 years. We have discussions about the president And the office taking our firearms away. It is never a if with him, it is always when.

Slowly it is being imbedded into peoples heads that we do not need firearms. It is trickling down to our children. If we continue to let it happen, it will happen, it is just a matter of when.

If you can not see it happening then you are either for it or you have not woken up yet.
I was just reading some articles about where people are relocating.  For 2013, it was Oregon at the top of the list and then followed by other Western and Southern states.  Most of those people were relocating from the Northeast and were 'young professionals'.  Many were citing jobs and urban arts/entertainment as reasons to move.  So, you have a group that has been raised in one of the least gun friendly regions of the country that is trending more and more to moving into the more gun friendly areas at rates faster than the opposite is occurring.  So, unlikely that the Northeast will become any more pro-gun; but seems like the voting bases in the states that are getting most of the transplants would get more of a 'northeast flavor'.   :bash:  Maybe once they have lived in their new states they'll realize that guns aren't the boogeyman that some of their home states make them seem.

Offline arees

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 775
  • Location: Redmond, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, SCI, NRA
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #35 on: January 08, 2014, 07:43:08 AM »
When I took economics, I was taught about supply and demand. If supply goes down and demand goes up, the price that can be charged for available goods goes up, too. Less ammo means manufacturers can charge more for what they produce. One possible explanation is that the manufacturers have created a false scarcity to drive the price up, something big pharma does with drugs. I will grant you that another possible explanation is government purchases, however, the timing of the scarcity is what concerns me. Nobody had any  trouble getting ammo until all of these emails started going around about Obama taking guns and ammo, which to date, have proven false. However, all of my conservative friends who circulate these emails are also the ones stockpiling ammo like there is no tomorrow. My choice is to not buy into all of these fear based, "the sky is falling" communications. I hope that others may see the value in that too.

I can tell you that I am having a hard time "stockpiling" ammunition.  I can't find any to buy.

My recollection is that supplies of reloading components dried up first, while Obama was pretending to not be interested in gun control.  For example, primers were scarce when loaded ammunition was still readily available.  I just did a spot check on Midway for "large rifle primers" under the  "primers" category.  There are 22 matching products.  None of which are in stock.  Midway's description for "Out of Stock, No Backorder" is:

Product is not available for order, and we cannot offer a backorder option because the manufacturer is unable to provide us with a reliable "Date expected in stock." In most cases, this is due to unusually high demand or a lack of raw materials. As soon as we have reliable information, we will update the status of the product.

At the time I first heard of primers becoming scares the explanation was that military contracts were taking up all the available resources.  Back then I backordered some and they eventually showed up.  Now if I needed more I can not even backorder them.

If it is simply a stockpiling issue, how many years can it go on?  Eventually people run out of space to put these things and the supply chain catches up. 

Why can't the manufacturers provide a reliable "Date expected in stock?"  Knowing the rate your factory produces product and how many orders you have is a simple business function unless something is disrupting your incoming supplies or you have large priority orders that you can not predict.

Remmington is opening a new ammunition factory.  This would imply that they believe there is a sustained increase in demand and not a short term availability issue.  You don't build a new factory for a short term run on a product.

I'm not sure what is driving the scarcity, but observations at gun shows and Walmart don't provide answers.
We need a crusade for the children, a children's crusade.

Offline deltaops

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 721
  • Location: Bonney Lake, WA
  • “Heads” I win, “Tails” you lose!
Re: Obama and Bloomberg Use December 14 to Promote Gun Control
« Reply #36 on: January 08, 2014, 01:14:16 PM »
Some people just do not see it coming.

I have a friend who is in the military, he hasn't worn civilian clothes in about 5 years. We have discussions about the president And the office taking our firearms away. It is never a if with him, it is always when.

Slowly it is being imbedded into peoples heads that we do not need firearms. It is trickling down to our children. If we continue to let it happen, it will happen, it is just a matter of when.

If you can not see it happening then you are either for it or you have not woken up yet.

I meant to say he hasn't worn military clothing in over 5 years but he is still in.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Nevada bull hunt 2025 by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 03:20:09 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 01:32:20 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by highside74
[Today at 01:27:51 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by lonedave
[Today at 12:58:20 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:00:55 PM]


MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal