collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill

Yes
No

Author Topic: HB 2342 Would Prohibit Public Access to Bodies of Water if there is No Parking  (Read 9990 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
House Bill 2342 introduced today by Rep Haler would require state and local agencies that own lands that are one-quarter square miles or less in size adjacent to a body of water must provide adequate public parking. If parking is not provided then using that land to access the water is prohibited and you will face misdemeanor charges.

(1) If a parcel of public land is one-quarter of a square mile or less in size and is adjacent to a body of public water and the land is or can be used to access the body of public water, the governmental entity which has jurisdiction of the land must provide adequate public parking for persons utilizing the land to access the water.
(2) If adequate public parking is not provided, using the land to access the water for other than a governmental purpose is prohibited. If adequate public parking is not provided, the governmental entity which has jurisdiction of the land must post a warning sign for the public that clearly shows that using the land to access the water is prohibited and states the sanction for a violation of the prohibition.
(3) A violation of this section is a misdemeanor.

http://dlr.leg.wa.gov/billsummary/default.aspx?Bill=2342&year=2013
« Last Edit: January 15, 2014, 09:39:11 AM by bigtex »

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
whew!


That's going to piss off a lot of roadside fishermen.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
whew!


That's going to piss off a lot of roadside fishermen.

No kidding. I have a feeling there is a story behind this one  :dunno:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Sounds like it's an attempt to lock the public out of hunting and/or fishing on public waters so that private landowners adjacent to the water can have exclusive access.

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
 :) I remember a news story about access to Lake Washington. some public property people use to access it that pissed off the residents.
this idea sucks!
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline fastdam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 876
  • Location: washington
That would support the UNITED NATIONS Agenda 21. 

Offline viva_che1363

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 352
  • Location: N. Idaho
so much for fishing spots that are not a a zoo. id say 75% of my fishing spots would be impacted. unless i wanna park and walk up the road a few miles. :bash:
“Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.”
― Theodore Roosevelt

Offline magnanimous_j

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 8659
Sounds like it's an attempt to lock the public out of hunting and/or fishing on public waters so that private landowners adjacent to the water can have exclusive access.

Not just sportsmen, but anyone using the waterfront for any recreation. I guess the property owners don’t like seeing us plebs when they look out their 20 foot, floor to ceiling windows. Poor dears.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
This must be a senator from the wetside that introduced this bill. Sure hope this one doesnt pass. I have a duck hunting spot that would be affected.

Haler is a Republican from the Richland area

Offline 724wd

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Spokane
This must be a senator from the wetside that introduced this bill. Sure hope this one doesnt pass. I have a duck hunting spot that would be affected.

Haler is a Republican from the Richland area

then he can go jump off the Blue Bridge!

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
This one has been bugging me so it's time for a bigtex rant.

This just shows the utter stupidity of some of the bills that are introduced into the legislature. If this representative truly thinks this bill will get any support, let alone pass I think we need to rethink his position in the legislature. Like I already said, there has to be a story behind this bill.

There are a lot of good bills introduced into the legislature that for whatever reason don't pass. Then there are bills that are introduced simply to make a point. Typically these bills that are introduced to make a point have no intention on passing yet they get the public all riled up.

How much time and money is wasted on bills that a) will never pass or b) are simply there to make a point and have no intention on passing???

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Sounds like it's an attempt to lock the public out of hunting and/or fishing on public waters so that private landowners adjacent to the water can have exclusive access.
Or it is an attempt to try to make those agencies add 'adequate parking' to those lands.  1/4 of a square mile is 160 acres and it is not unheard of to have about 1 mile of riverbank on 160 acres.  I guess this would prohibit boats from parking on the bank too?

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Sounds like it's an attempt to lock the public out of hunting and/or fishing on public waters so that private landowners adjacent to the water can have exclusive access.
Or it is an attempt to try to make those agencies add 'adequate parking' to those lands.  1/4 of a square mile is 160 acres and it is not unheard of to have about 1 mile of riverbank on 160 acres.  I guess this would prohibit boats from parking on the bank too?

Yeah I thought of that too.

bigtex, don't these proposed laws also give the reason behind it?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Sounds like it's an attempt to lock the public out of hunting and/or fishing on public waters so that private landowners adjacent to the water can have exclusive access.
Or it is an attempt to try to make those agencies add 'adequate parking' to those lands.  1/4 of a square mile is 160 acres and it is not unheard of to have about 1 mile of riverbank on 160 acres.  I guess this would prohibit boats from parking on the bank too?

Yeah I thought of that too.

bigtex, don't these proposed laws also give the reason behind it?

Some do have an "intent" section written into the law. This one doesn't. If it does eventually go to a committee hearing there will be a formal, easily to read document which will kind of outline the purpose, but until that happens we are stuck with the 3 sections I posted.

Offline ghosthunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 7620
  • Location: Mount Vernon WA
What they really need is a bill that requires the state to insure access to every non private lake in the state. Two building sites must be set aside forever for public access.

Same thing with ocean beach access in every community.
GHOST CAMP "We Came To Hunt"
Proud Parent of A United States Marine

We are all traveling from Birth to the Packing House. ( Broken Trail)

“I f he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.” ― Theodore Roosevelt

Don’t Curse the Darkness.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Today at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Today at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Today at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Today at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Today at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal