Free: Contests & Raffles.
Kind of old news...Already a thread on this
I think they shouldn't be aloud to charge more than 100. They want animals off the property because of timber damage but they make access difficult for a minimal wage guy to hunt.
I heard a rumor that a couple of our Washington Senators who have a history of hunting on weyco land are trying to pass a bill that would limit the amount of money that private land owners (weyco) can charge for access to their land to $100 bucks. In return private land owners will be able to eliminate the liability protection which they currently have to pay because of charging access to their land and is supposedly very expensive for them.Just curious if anyone else has heard anything about this? Does this even make sense? Do you think this is good, bad, indifferent? I haven't been able to find anything online to back this claim. I heard the rumor from someone who works as a consultant to the timber companies.I also heard that Oregon did this years back and it has worked well for them. Here is a link to what I can find out abut the liability laws in WA: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=4.24.210
Its their property, they should be able to charge what they want. After all we didn't do anything to stop all the damage that was caused for all the years it was free. Hunterman(Tony)
Quote from: bigtex on February 10, 2014, 08:58:15 PMKind of old news...Already a thread on thisSorry didn't know there was already a thread on this. I did a search and was unable to find anything. Does anyone care to share the link?