collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolves do affect business  (Read 66868 times)

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3396
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #255 on: February 24, 2014, 10:32:13 PM »
There is no correlation between the success rates depicted in the chart and overall Elk population either.

No direct correlation. Not an animal to animal correlation. But how many times has it been argued here that lack of success is costing Idaho and other states hunters? So what is more important, how many elk Idaho has, or how many get harvested each year.  I'd say as long as you can maintain it, harvest numbers are more important than total numbers. But that's just me.

Doesn't do you any good to have the woods full of animals if you can't harvest them.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38555
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #256 on: February 24, 2014, 10:42:36 PM »
There is no correlation between the success rates depicted in the chart and overall Elk population either.

No direct correlation. Not an animal to animal correlation. But how many times has it been argued here that lack of success is costing Idaho and other states hunters? So what is more important, how many elk Idaho has, or how many get harvested each year.  I'd say as long as you can maintain it, harvest numbers are more important than total numbers. But that's just me.

Doesn't do you any good to have the woods full of animals if you can't harvest them.

Pretty simple math for me, if you have 50,000 cows that calf, with a 40% survival you probably add 20,000 calves to the elk population. Hunters can probably take 15,000 or more elk each year.

If that same elk population is reduced by wolves to 20,000 cows calving, and wolves are holding the calf survival down to 10%, then you only add 2,000 calves to the population. If hunters continue to take 15,000 or more elk each year the math isn't going to work very long.  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #257 on: February 24, 2014, 10:43:33 PM »
Recess is over, it's time to take your seat.

 :chuckle:

bout time for me to hit the sack

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #258 on: February 24, 2014, 10:45:38 PM »
KF- The graph I posted is from the IDFG elk management plan...the same plan/source data bearpaw is posting on recent harvest and population trends.  But thats nice you can draw  :tup:

I do believe the long-term trends in any population data, whether its yellowstone or Lolo or Idaho as a whole gives a better sense of some of the points many folks try to make on these forums: elk numbers are dynamic and lots of factors contribute to those changes.  I think we all generally agree on that  :dunno:  It is misleading to think that wolves aren't holding down elk numbers in specific units...it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #259 on: February 24, 2014, 10:49:44 PM »
it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

Burn it to the ground and you might see some significant rebound.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38555
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #260 on: February 24, 2014, 10:53:46 PM »
KF- The graph I posted is from the IDFG elk management plan...the same plan/source data bearpaw is posting on recent harvest and population trends.  But thats nice you can draw  :tup:

I do believe the long-term trends in any population data, whether its yellowstone or Lolo or Idaho as a whole gives a better sense of some of the points many folks try to make on these forums: elk numbers are dynamic and lots of factors contribute to those changes.  I think we all generally agree on that  :dunno:  It is misleading to think that wolves aren't holding down elk numbers in specific units...it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

It's in the Idaho plan to reduce wolves and improve habitat, can't agree more, but the wolves must be reduced too.  :twocents:

FYI - We have the same problem in NE WA, over aged forests due to hugger control of our USFS. We need logging and wolf reduction. Why burn it when locals need employment?
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #261 on: February 24, 2014, 11:02:40 PM »
it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

Burn it to the ground and you might see some significant rebound.
:yeah: 
One of these days I'm going to go hand out fireworks and cases of beer to the camps I encounter when I'm up flyfishing on kelly cr.  :chuckle: 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

If this is your trap by SWHUNTER
[Today at 10:50:36 PM]


WA Moose scouting by huntnnw
[Today at 10:42:18 PM]


JBLM Archery by Carwash
[Today at 10:20:12 PM]


William o Douglas lakes by buggy
[Today at 10:12:58 PM]


JBLM by Carwash
[Today at 10:08:39 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by run870
[Today at 09:15:50 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Stein
[Today at 09:14:42 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Vandal44
[Today at 07:10:03 PM]


3 days for Kings by Parasite
[Today at 07:02:37 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by dvolmer
[Today at 06:30:50 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by greenhead_killer
[Today at 06:18:45 PM]


Yakima bow shop by maxwell
[Today at 05:41:04 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by Stein
[Today at 05:01:50 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Today at 03:44:43 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Today at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Today at 02:02:40 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 09:25:10 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 07:31:32 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal