collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Expandable Broadheads  (Read 11449 times)

Offline washelkhunter

  • Region 5 State Delegate #3
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 3549
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Site sponsorhttp
  • Groups: TPE, NRA, RMEF, AST
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2014, 02:22:30 PM »
I'd certainly like to give them a try before making a judgement.



I hear wolf season is open in Stevens county. No tag reqd.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2014, 02:43:00 PM by washelkhunter »

Offline fair-chase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1618
  • Location: Tri-Cities WA
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2014, 02:53:25 PM »
Why would almost every pro out there be using some sort of mechanical broadhead if they didn't work?  :dunno: 

That's easy, because they get paid to!!!

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2014, 03:03:31 PM »
Its an old law written when the early expandables were unreliable. Early designs were weak and only forward opening. They required up to 30% of a leagal arrows energy to open, and had the tip reccest to far towards the bades causing them to cartwheel on quartering shots. Todays mechs are much better but still not on par with a good fixed blade. That being said I've seen plenty of fixed blades that are crap and only designed to seperate you from your wallet. State law says a 40# bow and a 300grn arrow is the minimum requirement and you won't see mechs here until that changes. Plus this is washington, land of big roosevelt elk, blacktail and mulies not german sheperd sized whitetail. The state wants you to build an arrow for when everything goes wrong, not for when everything goes right!

Wow, That saved me a bunch of typing.  Thank you :tup:
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9005
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2014, 03:07:20 PM »
Its an old law written when the early expandables were unreliable. Early designs were weak and only forward opening. They required up to 30% of a leagal arrows energy to open, and had the tip reccest to far towards the bades causing them to cartwheel on quartering shots. Todays mechs are much better but still not on par with a good fixed blade. That being said I've seen plenty of fixed blades that are crap and only designed to seperate you from your wallet. State law says a 40# bow and a 300grn arrow is the minimum requirement and you won't see mechs here until that changes. Plus this is washington, land of big roosevelt elk, blacktail and mulies not german sheperd sized whitetail. The state wants you to build an arrow for when everything goes wrong, not for when everything goes right!

Wow, That saved me a bunch of typing.  Thank you :tup:

Aww, c'mon Rad!  I've been watching this thread, waiting for you to chime in!
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13263
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #34 on: February 25, 2014, 03:11:23 PM »
I'm a little disappointed myself.

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #35 on: February 25, 2014, 03:15:34 PM »
I would venture to say that if the Rage broadhead was available in the 80's they would be legal.  Punch Cutter, Puckett's Bloodbucket, Rocket and many other expandables of the day were so prone to failure the state was almost forced to make them illegal.

Aww, c'mon Rad!  I've been watching this thread, waiting for you to chime in!

Maybe I'll try to add something more substantial later :chuckle:  Got money to make right now!
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Jellymon

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1476
  • Location: Spanaway
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #36 on: February 25, 2014, 05:01:37 PM »
Here's a guy that tested a bunch of heads for penetration, sharpness, durability, sharp before impact, and sharp after categories. Look where most of the expendables ended up.

Results- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AgJEvQwzfDRZdGxzdC15R0JIZDJGQ1J4bVpGV1pTWHc

Info- http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1790525
« Last Edit: February 25, 2014, 05:11:08 PM by Jellymon »

Offline Come Get Some

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 495
  • Location: Roy
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2014, 04:53:01 AM »
Even with the new designs on the market, even though better than previous designs they will loose KE upon impact. 99% of the states that use them shoot small whiteTail deer. Although anything is possible as far as penetration the mechanical broadhead would not be as effective on larger game such as elk,Moose. Some guys  already take shots that are marginal, Expandables would in my opinion increae the amount of wounded game in Washington.

Offline bullfisher

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 697
  • Location: west side
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #38 on: February 26, 2014, 06:16:14 AM »
Here's a guy that tested a bunch of heads for penetration, sharpness, durability, sharp before impact, and sharp after categories. Look where most of the expendables ended up.

Results- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AgJEvQwzfDRZdGxzdC15R0JIZDJGQ1J4bVpGV1pTWHc

Info- http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1790525
I remember that thread. It was a good test and yes the fixed out performed most of the mechs. My only problem with the test was the range and target position. I've never shot an animal inside of 20yds with its body perfectly broadside and parallel to where I was shooting. Set the target at 40yds at a slight angle and I think you would see even greater seperation in performance.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2014, 06:27:51 AM by bullfisher »

Offline Jellymon

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1476
  • Location: Spanaway
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #39 on: February 26, 2014, 06:30:41 AM »
I believe he did those tests at 30yds. It would be interesting to throw a few variables in the mix.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9707
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #40 on: February 26, 2014, 06:42:55 AM »
I shoot Shuttle T's, but a Rage 2 blade is devastating! I have seen what these do

Offline bullfisher

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 697
  • Location: west side
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #41 on: February 26, 2014, 07:23:04 AM »
I believe he did those tests at 30yds. It would be interesting to throw a few variables in the mix.
20yds page 3.
I noticed in some of the test pics the gel is towards the front of the target box and some pics towards the rear, hard to get even results like that. I don't think the tester was prepared for that thread to blow up like that. I can tell you from experience,  testing archery equipment gets EXPENSIVE!

Offline irishevox

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1491
  • Location: Whidbey Isalnd
  • Groups: n/a
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #42 on: February 26, 2014, 07:24:15 AM »
The swacker isn't considered an expandable. b/c they are held together by a rubber band you can shoot them either way open or closed. on impact if in closed position, they open.
Member:  YKWTSASFFRO (The young Buck)

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13263
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #43 on: February 26, 2014, 07:34:47 AM »
The swacker isn't considered an expandable. b/c they are held together by a rubber band you can shoot them either way open or closed. on impact if in closed position, they open.
the swacker is an expandable.

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Expandable Broadheads
« Reply #44 on: February 26, 2014, 07:35:34 AM »
The swacker isn't considered an expandable. b/c they are held together by a rubber band you can shoot them either way open or closed. on impact if in closed position, they open.

Good luck getting a gamie to go along with that one  :chuckle:
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Skunks by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:42:04 PM]


My pics from over the years by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:37:10 PM]


Rabbits on the Yakima Reservation? by Limhangerslayer
[Yesterday at 07:44:39 PM]


Results of 3 point or better rule by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 06:55:20 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 05:02:47 PM]


Looking for help with Cummins 6CTA (8.3 liter medium duty diesel) by pd
[Yesterday at 04:41:12 PM]


bc style down rigger rod by Houndhunter
[Yesterday at 04:19:48 PM]


2 more Laminate hand calls by rainshadow1
[Yesterday at 03:42:44 PM]


turkey hunting question series - 4 by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 01:47:46 PM]


blacktail deer bait by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 01:25:47 PM]


Some nice animals from last season by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 11:22:29 AM]


Charcuterie by Fletch
[Yesterday at 10:18:01 AM]


7 saum headspace gauges by edaniels97
[Yesterday at 06:55:50 AM]


Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study by Fromm
[Yesterday at 06:36:16 AM]


A cougar tries to steal my cat by EnglishSetter
[February 02, 2026, 08:59:13 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal