collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).  (Read 2252 times)

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« on: February 20, 2014, 08:15:57 PM »
Enjoy....

Incoming





Crash Landing Series













Fish Eaters!!!







« Last Edit: February 26, 2014, 09:57:56 AM by LndShrk »
Logged

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2014, 08:27:56 PM »
Fun times. 100-400L?

I'm curious about your second photo: did you add that vignette yourself or is that out of camera?
Logged

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2014, 08:39:18 PM »
Quote from: Bean Counter on February 20, 2014, 08:27:56 PM
Fun times. 100-400L?

I'm curious about your second photo: did you add that vignette yourself or is that out of camera?
Yes 100-400L

Lightroom for the vignette.

I am still a NOOB have to crop most.  8)
Logged

Offline grandpawrichard

  • Team Turbo Nock Coach
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 2225
  • Location: Beautiful Downtown Burlington, Washington
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2014, 10:36:39 AM »
Well, the new lens did great, but the photographer did an Awesome job! Congrats on the new lens and the awesome skills to use it! :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup:

Dick
Logged
2 Canon 7D Cameras, Canon 5D Mark II Camera, Canon 17-40 F/4 L lens, 2 Canon 24-105 L lens, , Canon 300 f/4 IS  L lens, Canon 400 f/4 L lens, Canon 1.4X L extender, Canon 2X L extender,  Tamron 150-600 lens, Canon 430 EX Flash, Canon 530 EX Flash

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2014, 11:14:21 AM »
Quote from: grandpawrichard on February 21, 2014, 10:36:39 AM
Well, the new lens did great, but the photographer did an Awesome job! Congrats on the new lens and the awesome skills to use it! :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup: :tup:

Dick

Thanks,

I am not sure the photographer has touched the capabilities of the equipment as this point. Once I start to figure out all the settings I hope to bring some stronger clarity and depth to the pics. It is a fun hobby though.

Logged

Offline Huntbear

  • I am a BAD Kitteh
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 9616
  • Location: Wandering Lost East of the Mountains
  • Y.A.R. Jester aka Smart Ass
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1236486665
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2014, 09:15:04 AM »
Was hoping to see these shots as I am considering this very same lens.... 
Logged
By my honorable conduct as a hunter let me give a good example and teach new hunters principles of honor, so that each new generation can show respect for their god, other hunters and the animals, and enjoy the dignity of the hunt.

Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'.

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2014, 12:54:00 PM »
Quote from: Huntbear on February 26, 2014, 09:15:04 AM
Was hoping to see these shots as I am considering this very same lens....

Sorry I was moving some photos around. They are back.
Logged

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2014, 01:26:19 PM »
Quote from: Huntbear on February 26, 2014, 09:15:04 AM
Was hoping to see these shots as I am considering this very same lens.... 

Have you considered the 70-200mm? On a crop is great for wildlife if you can sneak close. I don't prefer a bazooka of a lens.  :twocents:
Logged

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2014, 01:32:22 PM »
Quote from: Bean Counter on February 26, 2014, 01:26:19 PM
Quote from: Huntbear on February 26, 2014, 09:15:04 AM
Was hoping to see these shots as I am considering this very same lens.... 

Have you considered the 70-200mm? On a crop is great for wildlife if you can sneak close. I don't prefer a bazooka of a lens.  :twocents:


I am going to rent the 70-200mm f/2.8 with the 2x for the weekend and do some comparisons I may very well be changing over.  :tup:

I like the 100-400 for sure but it is big and heavy. I am not a fan of the tension ring on it either.
Logged

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: New Glass For the Canon (Pic Heavy).
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2014, 03:32:40 PM »
Quote from: LndShrk on February 26, 2014, 01:32:22 PM
Quote from: Bean Counter on February 26, 2014, 01:26:19 PM
Quote from: Huntbear on February 26, 2014, 09:15:04 AM
Was hoping to see these shots as I am considering this very same lens.... 

Have you considered the 70-200mm? On a crop is great for wildlife if you can sneak close. I don't prefer a bazooka of a lens.  :twocents:


I am going to rent the 70-200mm f/2.8 with the 2x for the weekend and do some comparisons I may very well be changing over.  :tup:

I like the 100-400 for sure but it is big and heavy. I am not a fan of the tension ring on it either.
Try the 70-200 with a 1.4x, you will only lose one stop and be very close to the reach  of the 400mm you have, and have a much better IS system. With the 2x you will lose two stops. I'm betting you will find the 70-200 2.8 sharper. :twocents:
Logged
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

2025 blacktail rut thread by Shrimper
[Today at 12:55:04 AM]
Any success Pearrygin / Chewuch Quality hunters? by Onlybucks
[Yesterday at 11:13:24 PM]
Any buck clarification by Tball77
[Yesterday at 09:37:57 PM]
More special privileges by Tbar
[Yesterday at 08:06:23 PM]
WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind by RC
[Yesterday at 07:28:50 PM]
Pearygin Quality by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 06:38:57 PM]
Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by Elkman
[Yesterday at 06:28:54 PM]
Hunting by Republic/Ferry county by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 06:00:16 PM]
The Mysterious $200,000 by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 12:10:37 PM]
Grizzly? by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 11:20:01 AM]
mushroom id on a hemlock by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 11:10:47 AM]
Making memories by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:40:31 AM]
Meet Kumpel by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:55:26 AM]
AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 08:28:35 AM]
MT general tag filled by Wingin it
[Yesterday at 08:22:45 AM]
What do I need for elk? by Kingofthemountain83
[November 14, 2025, 09:20:10 PM]
As He Lay by highside74
[November 14, 2025, 08:31:17 PM]
2025 deer, let's see em! by highside74
[November 14, 2025, 08:15:10 PM]
Idaho Unit 39 wolves by andrew_in_idaho
[November 14, 2025, 06:19:48 PM]
LINCOLN !! by nwwanderer
[November 14, 2025, 05:11:26 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal