collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!  (Read 6622 times)

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6226
  • Location: Toledo
Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« on: March 10, 2014, 04:26:05 PM »
Here ya go folks. Its official. And I think its a terrible decision!

WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

March 10, 2014
Contact: Cindy Le Fleur, (360) 696-6211

Three tributaries of Columbia River
designated wild steelhead gene banks

OLYMPIA - The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) today designated three tributaries of the lower Columbia River as "wild steelhead gene banks," where it will no longer release steelhead raised in fish hatcheries.

Starting this year, WDFW will no longer plant hatchery steelhead in the East Fork Lewis River or the North Fork Toutle/Green River. The Wind River, which has not been stocked with steelhead since 1997, will also be off-limits to any future releases.

As part of that plan, WDFW will redirect more than 50,000 hatchery smolts previously slated for the East Fork Lewis River into the Washougal River and Salmon Creek, and is working to place another 25,000 smolts previously earmarked for the North Fork Toutle/Green River.

Director Phil Anderson said those actions are part of a statewide effort to help conserve and restore wild steelhead, particularly those listed for protection under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). All three watersheds designated as gene banks today support wild steelhead listed as threatened since 1998.

"We are building a future where wild steelhead - our state fish - can be enjoyed as part of the natural heritage of our state," Anderson said. "We will continue to support fisheries with hatchery production in selected areas of southwest Washington, while ensuring that wild fish can be given the best opportunity possible to rebuild and flourish in the future."

Studies have shown that hatchery fish can compete with wild steelhead for spawning partners, and that interbreeding can reduce survival rates for wild steelhead, Anderson said.

WDFW first identified wild steelhead gene banks as a recovery strategy in the Statewide Steelhead Management Plan, adopted by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission in 2008. The department designated the Sol Duc River on the Olympic Peninsula as the state's first official wild steelhead gene bank in 2012.

Cindy LeFleur, WDFW regional fish manager, said the department's selection of the three gene banks in the lower Columbia River Basin was based on criteria outlined in the statewide plan and public input received over the past two years. Three local advisory groups appointed by WDFW issued recommendations for specific areas, drawing hundreds of public comments - pro and con - at public meetings and in messages to the department.

"A key requirement for wild steelhead gene banks is that they have a self-sustaining wild steelhead population," LeFleur said. "The goal is to protect those primary populations and allow them to propagate with minimal interference from hatchery fish."

To support that effort, WDFW plans to open fishing seasons in the new wild steelhead zones targeting hatchery fish, which will continue to return to those rivers for at least two more years, LeFleur said. Catch-and-release fishing for wild steelhead may also be allowed in later years.

Meanwhile, WDFW will continue to support fishing opportunities in other local rivers, LeFleur said. Those rivers include the mainstem Toutle, South Fork Toutle, Cowlitz, Kalama, Salmon, Washougal, and mainstem and North Fork Lewis rivers. 

Jim Scott, assistant director of WDFW's Fish Program, said the department will forward its final decisions on the gene banks to NOAA-Fisheries, the federal agency that oversees salmon and steelhead recovery in southwest Washington.

"NOAA-Fisheries has strongly supported our efforts to create these new wild steelhead zones, and we've communicated frequently throughout the process," he said.

Scott noted that WDFW plans to create more wild steelhead gene banks throughout the state in the years ahead.

"During the next six months, we will be focusing on establishing wild steelhead gene banks for Puget Sound and lower Columbia tributaries below the Cowlitz River," Scott said. "As with the plan announced today, our goal will be to continue to make those fish available for area fisheries where doing so is consistent with our steelhead conservation goals." 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been sent to the WDFW All Information mailing list.
Visit the WDFW News Release Archive at:  http://wdfw.wa.gov/news/
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this mailing list: http://wdfw.wa.gov/lists/unsubscribe.html

Offline Shane54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 168
  • Location: Bonney lake
    • Shane molz
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2014, 08:52:23 PM »
This frickin pisses me off! Really the north fork of the green??! This is crap
Don't fix what's not broken
Republican and proud

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2014, 08:58:16 PM »
This frickin pisses me off! Really the north fork of the green??! This is crap
This isn't the Green River in King County

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6226
  • Location: Toledo
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2014, 09:28:45 PM »
This frickin pisses me off! Really the north fork of the green??! This is crap
This isn't the Green River in King County

Nope the Green and Toutle out this way.

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4923
  • Location: Graham
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2014, 07:49:45 AM »
I'd like to hear what the rationale for choosing those North Toutle/Green was (looked on the website, couldn't find much). I guess I can see leaving the N. Toutle as sort of a "preserve" with what it has gone through. The only requirement I could find was a "self-sustaining" population- really... :dunno: And how will this impact the S. Fork?- will it be headed that direction too- it would lessen the "impact".

I know less about the EF Lewis, but that is a ton of past opportunity gone there... at least...
A Man's Gotta Eat

Offline JODakota

  • BIGtuna
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 1309
  • Location: Walla Walla
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2014, 09:15:42 AM »
I'd like to hear why you guys think this is crap? Wouldn't you rather have steelhead supporting themselves and doing well rather than paying somebody to rear them in steel pens?
Not for self, but for country

Offline hollymaster

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1123
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2014, 09:27:06 AM »
I'd like to hear why you guys think this is crap? Wouldn't you rather have steelhead supporting themselves and doing well rather than paying somebody to rear them in steel pens?

In the end it "might be great" but..... It is wdfw we are talking about.  :o

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2014, 09:29:59 AM »
I'd like to hear why you guys think this is crap? Wouldn't you rather have steelhead supporting themselves and doing well rather than paying somebody to rear them in steel pens?
:chuckle: Yeah guys, didn't you know the decline of native steelhead is a result of hatcheries. All it takes for natives to bounce back and "support themselves" is elimination of hatchery fish in their home streams. :chuckle:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Heredoggydoggy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5041
  • Location: Wenatchee
  • Team I'M TOO OLD FOR THIS $H!T !
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2014, 09:39:58 AM »
I'd like to hear why you guys think this is crap? Wouldn't you rather have steelhead supporting themselves and doing well rather than paying somebody to rear them in steel pens?
:chuckle: Yeah guys, didn't you know the decline of native steelhead is a result of hatcheries. All it takes for natives to bounce back and "support themselves" is elimination of hatchery fish in their home streams. :chuckle:

I think that any creature that has to go back to a specific place to survive should go extinct.  But the liberals say it's our fault that they can't, and their welfare is above ours!  :bash:
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.

When Bernie Madoff did it, it's called a "Ponzi Scheme"
When Government does it, it's called "Social Security"

Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3350
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2014, 09:48:20 AM »
A couple things.

Since when is the "native steelhead" our state fish?  I thought it was the steelhead??

Something to notice, when they talk about studies regarding hatchery fish interacting with native fish they state that the hatchery fish can compete with natives for food and spawning grounds and that they can effect native population, instead of hatchery fish will or do

I think that the state is pissing off more people with these banks than they are making happy. 

Also the state says that this is "ensuring that wild fish can be given the best opportunity possible to rebuild and flourish in the future", that's almost laughable.....if it wasn't so sad that people believe this

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5502
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2014, 09:52:04 AM »
I want to know if they plan to replace that lost opportunity by planting those fish somewhere else?  I doubt it and would guess we just lost another place to fish without any plans to make up for it.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2014, 10:06:14 AM »
I want to know if they plan to replace that lost opportunity by planting those fish somewhere else?  I doubt it and would guess we just lost another place to fish without any plans to make up for it.
But, but, that makes no sense. If removing steel pens, eliminating people rearing them to the point of "supporting themselves" and "dong well" actually works, then why would we lose that fishery? Wouldn't it make for better fishing, isn't that the end goal, enjoyment for everyone? Equality? :chuckle:

The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2014, 10:07:46 AM »
I'd like to hear why you guys think this is crap? Wouldn't you rather have steelhead supporting themselves and doing well rather than paying somebody to rear them in steel pens?
I'm not against the recovery of wild fish.  I am for the continuity of fishing.  If they determine that eliminating hatchery fish does help wild fish return then I would go with a slow phase out as opposed to this cold turkey quitting they seem to be going for.  Why kill off the recreation and the supporting industries with years of shutdown when they could reduce hatchery plants over time?  The wild fish have survived having their hatchery counterparts in the rivers with them for over a hundred years in some places, I don't think a drawdown of over 10 years would is going to hurt (other than maybe WDFW's $$$).  Seems like they don't take into account all the other affected businesses supported by the sport anglers--motels, boat manufacturers, rod builders, sporting goods stores, fuel sales, restaurants, etc.  Plus the sudden shutdowns make the fishermen that are already geared up for the season seek what is actually open and puts enormous pressure on a different area--temporary local boom, but seems to be followed by a shutdown---because I guess WDFW couldn't foresee 10X as many people fishing the only places they didn't shutdown.  :dunno:

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5502
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2014, 10:17:18 AM »
I want to know if they plan to replace that lost opportunity by planting those fish somewhere else?  I doubt it and would guess we just lost another place to fish without any plans to make up for it.
But, but, that makes no sense. If removing steel pens, eliminating people rearing them to the point of "supporting themselves" and "dong well" actually works, then why would we lose that fishery? Wouldn't it make for better fishing, isn't that the end goal, enjoyment for everyone? Equality? :chuckle:

Let's give WDFW the benefit of the doubt and assume this will work and wild steelhead will become more abundant (which I'd love, by the way).  Even then, anglers are going to lose opportunity for the foreseeable future while the runs rebuild themselves.  WDFW really should transfer that opportunity elsewhere while we wait.

Offline chukar58

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 233
  • Location: westside
  • What's in your freezer?
  • Groups: Washington State Bowhunters, RMEF
Re: Wild steelhead gene bank is decided!
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2014, 10:49:49 AM »
"Scott noted that WDFW plans to create more wild steelhead gene banks throughout the state in the years ahead".   Just the beginning of end for hatchery steelhead fishing in this state.  Unbelievable!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by redi
[Today at 03:54:29 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by EnglishSetter
[Today at 03:13:54 PM]


WSTA 2025 Summer Rendezvous Agenda by Humptulips
[Today at 03:09:35 PM]


Fullsized Truck Opinion: HiMiNew vs LoMiOlder by rainshadow1
[Today at 03:01:42 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by JBar
[Today at 02:20:40 PM]


Rotator Cuff repair X 2 advice needed by Wood2Sawdust
[Today at 01:36:26 PM]


Rock creek gone? Next? by JBar
[Today at 01:00:56 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by pcveen
[Today at 09:35:38 AM]


2025 Canning by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 07:19:25 AM]


Lynx kittens confirmed in the Kettle Range by dwils233
[Today at 12:04:14 AM]


How To Get Your $0.00 Tax Stamp - Black Hammer Arms by dreadi
[Yesterday at 11:33:25 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by Klickitatsteelie
[Yesterday at 09:23:56 PM]


First attempt at polish sausages by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 07:44:30 PM]


Best all around muzzy (updated) by jjhunter
[Yesterday at 07:44:26 PM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by Sitka_Blacktail
[Yesterday at 07:02:41 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by 92xj
[Yesterday at 05:34:03 PM]


3 days for Kings by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:06:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal