collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 270 question  (Read 8488 times)

Offline Instinct

  • yeep
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1257
  • Location: moses lake, Wa
270 question
« on: April 20, 2014, 10:10:03 PM »
just pIcked up a ruger American 270 was wondering what cartrages you suggest. mainly for deer, maybe Elk an bear. was looking around the 150gr but so many choices an theones I researched seems to be on back order. I'll be buying factory loads since I don't re load. thanks!

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39198
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 270 question
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2014, 10:19:21 PM »
Barnes, 130 or 140 grain is a good, versatile bullet.

Or the 140 grain Nosler Accubond.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: 270 question
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2014, 10:25:46 PM »
My Remmy .270 groups 130 grain Federal Power Shoks just fine

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1797
  • Location: Western WA
Re: 270 question
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2014, 10:58:43 PM »
My .270 really like the redbox federal 140gr accubonds
Dilligaf

Offline Instinct

  • yeep
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1257
  • Location: moses lake, Wa
Re: 270 question
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2014, 12:12:21 AM »
thanks for the replys, anyone shoot the federal vital shock 130gr with the nosler partition?

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: 270 question
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2014, 01:30:59 AM »
anyone shoot the federal vital shock 130gr with the nosler partition?

I'm not a big fan of the partition in 130/.270.  I've seen a good number of bear shot with it and I had to finish off each one.  Not sure if it was a unique problem with the .270 back in the late 80's or not, but the memory of those total failures plays new in my head.  Each time the front blew apart before ever entering the chest cavity.  Then a wound channel smaller than a dime.  I've seen better wound channels from a round ball.

Again these are old issues and may have been resolved by Nosler by now :dunno:  Maybe it had to do with shots under 100 yards and the velocity of the 270  :dunno: x2.  But with all the great bullets available today I will never load it in one of my 270's!

I generally like the 130 and 140 grain .270 bullets.  They are usually plenty good penetrators and guys tend to shoot them really well.  Probably as many bear taken with us back then using the 270 WIN as any other single round.  And we never lost a bear shot with a 130 grain Core-Lokt or 140 grain BTSP Interlock.  I never had to put another round into a bear killed with one of these either.  Though they are a little messy ;)

It's a bit more spendy, but I'm really liking both the 130 grain Nosler Trophy Grade with Accubond and the Winchester with 140 Accubond CT.  Both are super accurate out of our guns, feed fantastic and I haven't seen an animal take a step after being hit with either.  I haven't shot or seen anyone use a Federal Vita Shock so I'm no help with that.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2014, 10:48:14 PM by RadSav »
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Heredoggydoggy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5041
  • Location: Wenatchee
  • Team I'M TOO OLD FOR THIS $H!T !
Re: 270 question
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2014, 01:39:37 AM »
When I got a 270 back in the 70's, the old guy at the gun shop where I bought it said to only shoot 130s, because that was what the cartridge was designed to shoot.  :dunno:
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.

When Bernie Madoff did it, it's called a "Ponzi Scheme"
When Government does it, it's called "Social Security"

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: 270 question
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2014, 12:07:55 PM »
A 140gr Accubond will do what your looking to do and more.

Offline Instinct

  • yeep
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1257
  • Location: moses lake, Wa
Re: 270 question
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2014, 01:49:22 PM »
well I was at cabelas an I saw the nosler trophy grade 130gr accubond. so I picked up a couple boxes so we'll see how they shoot but I'm sure they'll be awesome
II

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: 270 question
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2014, 02:03:18 PM »
well I was at cabelas an I saw the nosler trophy grade 130gr accubond. so I picked up a couple boxes so we'll see how they shoot but I'm sure they'll be awesome
II

 :tup:  With the exception of my 20" barrel 257 Rob my guns LOVE that stuff.  I'm sure once the sticker shock is over your gun will like it too.
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Online jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11332
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: 270 question
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2014, 02:07:15 PM »
Winchester Super X in 150 grains.  Hands down the most effective factory loads I have ever shot out of my .270's and they are cheaper than all the rest.  Good Luck.

Offline huntandjeep

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 2899
  • Location: West Valley , Yakima
Re: 270 question
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2014, 04:19:06 PM »
130 grain Nosler trophy grade here also my Weatherby .270 loves them. Spendy but worth it
Anyone that thinks a Glock is better than a 1911 paints his toenails.
Yakima Valley Mountaineers

Offline WoodlandShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 1024
  • Location: neither here nor there
  • Groups: P.H.U.
Re: 270 question
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2014, 08:38:44 AM »
Sure would be cool lif there was a factory offering in 270 Win AND a faster twist than 10

Online C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10935
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: 270 question
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2014, 08:53:50 AM »
I would also suggest looking at ammo loaded with the 140gr Accubond. If you want something cheaper to shoot, that always did well for me, was the blue box of Federal Classic ammo. I shot the 130gr. The Federals did very well on deer, mostly Bang..Flop type kills. Have fun with your new rifle!!
« Last Edit: April 22, 2014, 09:02:06 AM by C-Money »
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39198
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 270 question
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2014, 08:59:16 AM »
Winchester Super X in 150 grains.  Hands down the most effective factory loads I have ever shot out of my .270's and they are cheaper than all the rest.  Good Luck.

I agree with the 150 grain Power Points. I mostly use hand loads but I have a hard time getting better accuracy than I get with the Winchester 150 grain Power Points in my A bolt. 

The buck in my avatar is proof that they are a good bullet. He never knew what hit him.   :IBCOOL:

Offline hub

  • Port Orchard
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 106
  • Location: port orchard,Wa.
Re: 270 question
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2014, 12:04:08 PM »
I'm not a big fan of the partition in 130/.270.  I've seen a good number of bear shot with it and I had to finish off each one.  Not sure if was a unique problem with the .270 back in the late 80's or not, but the memory of those total failures plays new in my head.  Each time the front blew apart before ever entering the chest cavity.  Then a wound channel smaller than a dime.  I've seen better wound channels from a round ball.

Again these are old issues and may have been resolved by Nosler by now :dunno:  Maybe it had to do with shots under 100 yards and the velocity of the 270  :dunno: x2.  But with all the great bullets available today I will never load it in one of my 270's!

I generally like the 130 and 140 grain .270 bullets.  They are usually plenty good penetrators and guys tend to shoot them really well.  Probably as many bear taken with us back then using the 270 WIN as any other single round.  And we never lost a bear shot with a 130 grain Core-Lokt or 140 grain BTSP Interlock.  I never had to put another round into a bear killed with one of these either.  Though they are a little messy ;)

It's a bit more spendy, but I'm really liking both the 130 grain Nosler Trophy Grade with Accubond and the Winchester with 140 Accubond CT.  Both are super accurate out of our guns, feed fantastic and I haven't seen an animal take a step after being hit with either.  I haven't shot or seen anyone use a Federal Vita Shock so I'm no help with that.
What bullet did you use for that finish shot ? Probably should use that bullet for the first shot.  :dunno:

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: 270 question
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2014, 12:35:15 PM »
hornady super performance sst 140 :tup:

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: 270 question
« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2014, 02:10:06 PM »
What bullet did you use for that finish shot ? Probably should use that bullet for the first shot.  :dunno:

The two guns I carried as backup guns when guiding were 444Mln and 45ACP.  I think both used Winchester back in those days.
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline buck man

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1269
  • Location: Spokane area
Re: 270 question
« Reply #18 on: April 22, 2014, 10:25:23 PM »
What bullet did you use for that finish shot ? Probably should use that bullet for the first shot.  :dunno:

The two guns I carried as backup guns when guiding were 444Mln and 45ACP.  I think both used Winchester back in those days.

Rad, I have killed 17 bears with 130 grain ballistic tip, 8 with 130 grain hornady spire point, and 5 with 150 grain partition. All but two were one shot kills. Never had a problem with the ballistic tips. All of these were hand loads. Don't know if that makes a difference :dunno:. All I know is a lot of bears have died by my 270 :tup:
If we were supposed to be vegetarian God would have made broccoli more fun to shoot!
"HOYT" why would you even consider shooting something else?

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: 270 question
« Reply #19 on: April 22, 2014, 10:44:18 PM »
Rad, I have killed 17 bears with 130 grain ballistic tip, 8 with 130 grain hornady spire point, and 5 with 150 grain partition. All but two were one shot kills. Never had a problem with the ballistic tips. All of these were hand loads. Don't know if that makes a difference :dunno:. All I know is a lot of bears have died by my 270 :tup:

And what's the price of tea in China these days?

anyone shoot the federal vital shock 130gr with the nosler partition?

I'm not a big fan of the partition in 130/.270.  I've seen a good number of bear shot with it and I had to finish off each one.  Not sure if it was a unique problem with the .270 back in the late 80's or not, but the memory of those total failures plays new in my head.  Each time the front blew apart before ever entering the chest cavity.  Then a wound channel smaller than a dime.  I've seen better wound channels from a round ball.

Again these are old issues and may have been resolved by Nosler by now :dunno:  Maybe it had to do with shots under 100 yards and the velocity of the 270  :dunno: x2.  But with all the great bullets available today I will never load it in one of my 270's!

I generally like the 130 and 140 grain .270 bullets.  They are usually plenty good penetrators and guys tend to shoot them really well.  Probably as many bear taken with us back then using the 270 WIN as any other single round.  And we never lost a bear shot with a 130 grain Core-Lokt or 140 grain BTSP Interlock.  I never had to put another round into a bear killed with one of these either.  Though they are a little messy ;)

It's a bit more spendy, but I'm really liking both the 130 grain Nosler Trophy Grade with Accubond and the Winchester with 140 Accubond CT.  Both are super accurate out of our guns, feed fantastic and I haven't seen an animal take a step after being hit with either.  I haven't shot or seen anyone use a Federal Vita Shock so I'm no help with that.

You did start your post off with "Rad", didn't you :chuckle:
« Last Edit: April 22, 2014, 10:50:03 PM by RadSav »
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline buck man

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1269
  • Location: Spokane area
Re: 270 question
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2014, 10:56:16 PM »
Rad, I have killed 17 bears with 130 grain ballistic tip, 8 with 130 grain hornady spire point, and 5 with 150 grain partition. All but two were one shot kills. Never had a problem with the ballistic tips. All of these were hand loads. Don't know if that makes a difference :dunno:. All I know is a lot of bears have died by my 270 :tup:

And what's the price of tea in China these days?



anyone shoot the federal vital shock 130gr with the nosler partition?

I'm not a big fan of the partition in 130/.270.  I've seen a good number of bear shot with it and I had to finish off each one.  Not sure if it was a unique problem with the .270 back in the late 80's or not, but the memory of those total failures plays new in my head.  Each time the front blew apart before ever entering the chest cavity.  Then a wound channel smaller than a dime.  I've seen better wound channels from a round ball.

Again these are old issues and may have been resolved by Nosler by now :dunno:  Maybe it had to do with shots under 100 yards and the velocity of the 270  :dunno: x2.  But with all the great bullets available today I will never load it in one of my 270's!

I generally like the 130 and 140 grain .270 bullets.  They are usually plenty good penetrators and guys tend to shoot them really well.  Probably as many bear taken with us back then using the 270 WIN as any other single round.  And we never lost a bear shot with a 130 grain Core-Lokt or 140 grain BTSP Interlock.  I never had to put another round into a bear killed with one of these either.  Though they are a little messy ;)

It's a bit more spendy, but I'm really liking both the 130 grain Nosler Trophy Grade with Accubond and the Winchester with 140 Accubond CT.  Both are super accurate out of our guns, feed fantastic and I haven't seen an animal take a step after being hit with either.  I haven't shot or seen anyone use a Federal Vita Shock so I'm no help with that.

You did start your post off with "Rad", didn't you :chuckle:



Yep I said Rad. Sorry if that's too short for ya....... :chuckle:  as far as tea goes :dunno: :dunno:. Believe it or not. But I have killed more bears in my short life than most will see in a lifetime of hunting. All but one were killed with a 270. The only one not was with my 44 super red hawk. Let's just say in my profession I see a lot of bears.
If we were supposed to be vegetarian God would have made broccoli more fun to shoot!
"HOYT" why would you even consider shooting something else?

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: 270 question
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2014, 11:10:31 PM »
Yep I said Rad. Sorry if that's too short for ya....... :chuckle:  as far as tea goes :dunno: :dunno:. Believe it or not. But I have killed more bears in my short life than most will see in a lifetime of hunting. All but one were killed with a 270. The only one not was with my 44 super red hawk. Let's just say in my profession I see a lot of bears.

 :chuckle: :chuckle:  I really like the .270.  Might very well be the best all round gun for Washington hunting.  I'm not sure what the deal was, or is, with the 130 grain Partition in .270.  I'd certainly hope Nosler has improved it by now.  But it was sure a disaster for our bear hunters back in the 80's!  Good to know about the BT's.  I've never seen a bear killed or shot with a .270 Ballistic Tip before.  Not sure they were available back then  :dunno:
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline BallardBound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 10
  • Location: Seattle
Re: 270 question
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2014, 11:52:17 PM »
I use Remington 150 gr. cor-lokt.  Last elk I shot didn't know what hit it.  Maybe large for deer but I like to sight in with one bullet weight and go with it.  I wouldn't hesitate to shoot any Washington game, elk size or under, with it.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39198
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 270 question
« Reply #23 on: April 23, 2014, 12:04:18 AM »
There's no such thing as a bullet being "too large" for deer. Most of the deer I've killed with a 270 have been with a 150 grain bullet. In fact, maybe ALL of them. And one antelope. The only disadvantage is recoil is slightly more.

Offline fastdam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 876
  • Location: washington
Re: 270 question
« Reply #24 on: December 17, 2014, 06:56:05 AM »
130 partition anchored a nice buck for me this year. The bullet did exactly what it was supposed to. The front part expanded and used all its enery causing a 4 inchish wound channel and the back half carried on through with a small exit.   Shot placement is key no matter what bullet you shoot.

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: 270 question
« Reply #25 on: December 17, 2014, 04:53:56 PM »
 :) I think a 270 with 130 grain is super. Just shoot your gun. When you find a load you like and it shoots, there you are. I also think that Blue box Federal is passed over by alot of people cause it does not have a cool sounding name. I use it a lot in lots of calibers. It works very well!!!!
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline Instinct

  • yeep
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1257
  • Location: moses lake, Wa
Re: 270 question
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2014, 09:45:09 AM »
Thanks for the suggestions an thoughts. I purchased some winchester accubond ct 140gr. Gonna give those a try to see how they fly.

Offline Tyler_C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 100
Re: 270 question
« Reply #27 on: December 23, 2014, 04:04:46 PM »
Barnes Vor Tex tipped tsx 130 grain for deer.  100% copper.  Absolutely lethal...

Offline vandeman17

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 14477
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: 270 question
« Reply #28 on: December 23, 2014, 04:36:41 PM »
My Remmy .270 groups 130 grain Federal Power Shoks just fine

My winchester likes these shells too. 130 grain for deer and 150 for elk.
" I have hunted almost every day of my life, the rest have been wasted"

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32894
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 270 question
« Reply #29 on: December 23, 2014, 05:01:44 PM »
thanks for the replys, anyone shoot the federal vital shock 130gr with the nosler partition?

 My family has been using Partitions for decades and never had a issue or reason to change. There have been more than a couple trophies hung on the wall with these bullets over that time, several were 130gr from a .270! :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline 270Shooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3828
  • Location: Yakima
Re: 270 question
« Reply #30 on: December 23, 2014, 05:23:00 PM »
150gr partition from mcnetts doubletap, spendy but ultra high quality ammunition.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal