collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.  (Read 7428 times)

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2014, 04:18:13 PM »
The access fee will probably reduce application numbers more than the hoof disease. For me it was the two things put together. I considered paying the $150 for access, but then thought I really don't want to pay and especially don't want to pay to kill a sick elk.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2014, 04:55:32 PM »
Last year in the late season never saw any sick elk in the Margaret. Saw some nice bulls also.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2014, 05:05:16 PM »
The bull I killed up high had hoof rot. I haven't seen many limping elk up there but I watched him for a long time and he never limped so who knows.

I think the low success rates are mostly due to people thinking it's gonna be easy. The Margaret is so grown up now it's not drive around and shoot a big bull like it used to be. There are still a ton of elk and some good bulls in there.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2014, 07:15:20 AM »
Did you eat all the meat?  I'm glad to hear all this after being so discouraged about the hoof rot and access.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2014, 07:38:42 AM »
Absolutely I did. There was nothing wrong with the meat. I've been a part of killing several elk with hoof rot and none of them had tainted meat.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2014, 08:07:37 AM »
Good to know.  I have never hunted the Helens herd.  I will if drawn.  I will buy the access pass too.  I have a spot I hunt that has a lot of elk I don't really see the need to change areas.  But if the hoof rot and permits displace the crowds I could see my area being very crowded.  So I hope I draw but will probably start out of state next year for elk.  I'll buy a tag for the eastside and put in for archery permits but if not selected I'll hunt out of state.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2014, 09:14:08 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2014, 09:17:57 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2014, 09:29:48 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

 :yeah:  :yeah: its not just Agnes tho...theres a few different land owners up there


Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2014, 09:35:01 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2014, 10:01:19 AM »
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.
Communism hasn't been shown to be a success anywhere else it has been tried, not sure why Washington would be different.   :dunno:

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2014, 10:07:27 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!
It's not Agnew, but to the east of him, bordering the Monument, with the lakes and access that could reconnect the old Mt. Margaret Trail system.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Mt. St. Helens Goat by builtfordtough
[Today at 02:00:50 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:35:52 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by TriggerMike
[Today at 12:05:38 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by TriggerMike
[Today at 12:04:23 PM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by 2MANY
[Today at 11:03:51 AM]


Late Alta Muzzy by jstone
[Today at 10:24:19 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by cavemann
[Today at 10:11:36 AM]


Krackers Blow your doors off Razor chowder by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:00:00 AM]


Kettle Range Moose by sjhgraysage
[Today at 09:54:55 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by 2MANY
[Today at 09:29:37 AM]


European mounts around Spokane by BULLBLASTER
[Today at 07:05:24 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Bo_nimrod
[Today at 05:25:01 AM]


Possible record bull? by trophyhunt
[Today at 04:28:51 AM]


Color phase fox by Jpmiller
[Today at 02:54:40 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 10:51:39 PM]


re-barreling a gun by Bob33
[Yesterday at 07:13:13 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 06:32:24 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Yesterday at 06:22:55 PM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Yesterday at 12:14:08 PM]


Muzzleloader scope options by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:10:09 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal