Letter: Wolves and elk

[bearpaw]

I would agree with letting the wilderness areas burn as long as neighboring private land owners and public timber holdings could be assured safe haven. That's where it gets sticky.

I am not opposed to all wolves, I am opposed to unmanaged wolves, that's also where it gets sticky.

[wolfbait]

I would agree with letting the wilderness areas burn as long as neighboring private land owners and public timber holdings could be assured safe haven. That's where it gets sticky.

I am not opposed to all wolves, I am opposed to unmanaged wolves, that's also where it gets sticky.

Fire is good in many ways, many of us have seen the reaction. Take the Okanogan and the bitter brush, which is explosive, when burn't off grass grows again.

The orchardist are the main reason elk were not allowed in the Methow Valley for many years $$$. But not to worry WDFW planted Barnaby thistle in the Methow, they said it was for the deer to eat, whats one more screw up from WDFW?

Manage Wolves? WDFW can't even manage their lies, and it always come back and chews chunks out of their sit-down area. Which really doesn't matter to them because they just invent another. WDFW and Benghazi have a lot in common. In the end the truth will be known, but by that time it will be too late.

[mkcj]

I notice that Mr. Lung has NOT replied back yet in the comments.

[wolfbait]

I notice that Mr. Lung has NOT replied back yet in the comments.

Maybe he is lost in thought>>>