UNDERSTANDING MULE DEER AND ANTLER POINT RESTRICTIONS

[B.G.hunter]

Apr isn't why we've seen the better bucks, it's called nine day seasons when most bucks are still tough to get to.  I don't see how Apr works when you are harvesting your breeding bucks before they breed.

Totally agree

[baldopepper]

Apr isn't why we've seen the better bucks, it's called nine day seasons when most bucks are still tough to get to.  I don't see how Apr works when you are harvesting your breeding bucks before they breed.

Totally agree

I also agree-we are definitely seeing more deer in Unit 121 since the APR went into effect, but it has a lot to do with the fact that they did away with the  antlerless permits they had been allocating (it was either 1,000 or 2,000) in the years before they went to the APR and we've had  great winter conditions the last 2 years.  As the study shows, consistently areas that have relied on the APR to improve the herds have failed in the long run. 

[golfguy0912]

while I do agree with some points in that article, I fully support APR's. If these monster two points are really that big of an issue, and more areas with two point only special permits as they have done in some areas. In the areas that I hunt I don't believe we have a healthy enough local population of mule deer to support going back to any buck without causing significant damage to the population. It looks like the two options are either shut it down for a few years and "hope" for mild winters, or APR's. I would pick APR's every time.

[grundy53]

while I do agree with some points in that article, I fully support APR's. If these monster two points are really that big of an issue, and more areas with two point only special permits as they have done in some areas. In the areas that I hunt I don't believe we have a healthy enough local population of mule deer to support going back to any buck without causing significant damage to the population. It looks like the two options are either shut it down for a few years and "hope" for mild winters, or APR's. I would pick APR's every time.

There is a third option. Go to permit only for mulies.

sent from my typewriter

[vandeman17]

Keeping a certain group of people out of their wintering range would help too.

I would be ok with going to permit only for certain areas if I could guarantee that it would go back to normal when the herd was back to being prosperous. Considering the likelihood of that, guess I am against permit only. 

[baldopepper]

The problem, as the study points out, is there is no option for just an APR.  Attempt after attempt has been made and it just doesn't help the herd, and that's the bottom line.  Some combination of APR and restricted hunting works, but not as well as just restricted hunting.  No one likes that, but if that's what it takes to get a herd back to healthy levels then so be it. The key being a healthy population and shooting off the larger, mature breeding bucks and leaving the breeding to smaller, possibly not as strong or healthy bucks has proven in the long run to be very counter productive. It's not a matter of wanting to shoot spikes or two points-it's just proven science that produces a healthy population that will have it's share of bigger,mature bucks if that's what you want to hunt.   

[grundy53]

Keeping a certain group of people out of their wintering range would help too.

I would be ok with going to permit only for certain areas if I could guarantee that it would go back to normal when the herd was back to being prosperous. Considering the likelihood of that, guess I am against permit only. 

I agree.

sent from my typewriter

[B.G.hunter]

while I do agree with some points in that article, I fully support APR's. If these monster two points are really that big of an issue, and more areas with two point only special permits as they have done in some areas. In the areas that I hunt I don't believe we have a healthy enough local population of mule deer to support going back to any buck without causing significant damage to the population. It looks like the two options are either shut it down for a few years and "hope" for mild winters, or APR's. I would pick APR's every time.

There is a third option. Go to permit only for mulies.

sent from my typewriter

There may be a fourth option also and micro manage deer by sub species blacktail/whitetail/mule deer having hunter choose the one they are going to pursue. Or do a system similar to Idaho and have a regular tag with shorter seasons or a designated whitetail tag with longer and more favorable season.  I see these types as needing a limited entry or some sort of APR still but it may take some pressure off the struggling mule deer herds.  As for the giant two points I think we need to have a youth draw tags for two points after the general season maybe during the week of Veterans day so they can get some of there genes thinned out. 

[grundy53]

while I do agree with some points in that article, I fully support APR's. If these monster two points are really that big of an issue, and more areas with two point only special permits as they have done in some areas. In the areas that I hunt I don't believe we have a healthy enough local population of mule deer to support going back to any buck without causing significant damage to the population. It looks like the two options are either shut it down for a few years and "hope" for mild winters, or APR's. I would pick APR's every time.

There is a third option. Go to permit only for mulies.

sent from my typewriter

There may be a fourth option also and micro manage deer by sub species blacktail/whitetail/mule deer having hunter choose the one they are going to pursue. Or do a system similar to Idaho and have a regular tag with shorter seasons or a designated whitetail tag with longer and more favorable season.  I see these types as needing a limited entry or some sort of APR still but it may take some pressure off the struggling mule deer herds.  As for the giant two points I think we need to have a youth draw tags for two points after the general season maybe during the week of Veterans day so they can get some of there genes thinned out.

I like your 4th option a lot.

sent from my typewriter

[baldopepper]

I think maybe the best way to look at it is to look at it like cattlemen do.  You don't see them selling or slaughtering their big, healthy mature bulls and leaving the breeding randomly up to smaller, unproven bulls.  Getting a bigger population is not necessarily an indicator of a healthy herd.  You'd like to see a gene pool of stronger, healthy animals that have a better chance of surviving bad winters, predators, or disease.  Given a long term shoot off of the bigger mature bucks and eventually you end up with a herd of predominately smaller, weaker animals-that's what's happened in other states that have used the APR for herd management.  Not a one or two year development, but down the road a bit and that's what you see. Perhaps the posts of giant two points is an early example of a gene pool that's been limited.

[Maverick]

Change the rule to 3 point or smaller for mule deer and must get drawn for the big Muleys? Like the spike only rule for elk? 

I honestly hope that never happens!

[sakoshooter]

I fully support APRs.   THey have worked miracles in the units I grew up in.  One of the best moves the WDFW has ever done.

I have to agree with ya Bone. Much more mature bucks around since the 3pt rule was implemented. Just have to hunt a bit harder for them most days.

[Shane54]

I know where I hunt the 3 point or better rule has done an awesome job of creating GIANT 2-Point mulies.   

I FEEL YOUR PAIN! 

[Shane54]

What if mule deer went to 2pt min