collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wind mills in the umatilla national forest  (Read 1739 times)

Offline 400out

  • Radio Active YAR
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5451
  • Location: in a bunker
  • HA HA! VERY FUNNY!
Wind mills in the umatilla national forest
« on: May 16, 2014, 06:26:32 PM »
 :hello: :hello: friends! Sorry I've been lost for some time now but thought I would poke my head for a minute to share this story I heard the other day!!! Hope it hasn't been posted already if so I appologize! The BBM will like to get in on fighting this one!!!!

http://www.keprtv.com/news/local/Are-wind-farms-on-the-way-for-our-local-national-forests-257422881.html
Granted the ability to cause a A nuclear explosion that produces a rapid release of energy from a higher power resulting in the sudden and catastrophic demise of a thread.

Confucius say:
A crowded elevator smells different to a midget!
Man that go to bed with itchy butt wake up with stinky fingers!
Man who fight with wife all day get no piece at night.

Offline washelkhunter

  • Region 5 State Delegate #3
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 3549
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Site sponsorhttp
  • Groups: TPE, NRA, RMEF, AST
Re: Wind mills in the umatilla national forest
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2014, 06:57:19 PM »
These wind turbines are a blight upon the landscape. Not only are they monstrously ugly view spoilers they are mega blenders of our airborne wildlife. I simply cant imagine they would be allowed on NF lands.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21737
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline fair-chase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1618
  • Location: Tri-Cities WA
Re: Wind mills in the umatilla national forest
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2014, 07:07:09 PM »
My blood pressure just hit an all time high.   :bash:

Thanks for the info 400, I wasn't aware of this.  :tup:



Found a few more links for everyone...

USFS Press Release

Draft Plan and Environment Impact

Public Comments *REMINDER: COMMENTS WILL BE VIEWABLE BY THE PUBLIC*   Mostly directed at myself as it's hard find the appropriate (non profane) words that express exactly how I feel about this.  :chuckle:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10622
Re: Wind mills in the umatilla national forest
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2014, 10:17:38 PM »
Wind mill and solar panel fields are popping up allover BLM lands, especially in Southern California. Big difference in my opinion though; USFS (forested land) vs BLM (sand or sage brush)

Offline huntrights

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1701
Re: Wind mills in the umatilla national forest
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2014, 09:59:59 AM »
 
:twocents:

Wind and solar energy development is likely to be more common as time goes on.  Here are some thoughts:

1)   Areas where wind and solar farms are constructed will most likely greatly restrict or prohibit public access.  If we are losing public access in these areas, perhaps there is additional leverage to open public access to areas that may be considered good for hunting, fishing, and other outdoor sports; that is, STOP the road closures/destruction and imposing other onerous access restrictions.

2)   Use income from these renewable energy sources placed on public land to help pay for state and national parks, public access roads and road maintenance, etc.  The bottom line is the public should benefit, not just the developers, energy companies, and other involved individuals (i.e. possibly some unethical people in political circles and their families or business connections).

3)   Wind farms do have an impact on airborne wildlife (literally); this is an issue that should be brought up. 

4)   If the proposed land to be used for these renewable energy sources has other users (i.e. free range cattle ranching), how will their loss be compensated?
« Last Edit: May 17, 2014, 10:13:25 AM by huntrights »

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by muleyslayer
[Today at 02:45:11 PM]


Jetty Fishing by Mfowl
[Today at 02:44:59 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Crunchy
[Today at 01:58:27 PM]


Utah backdoor by baldopepper
[Today at 01:37:26 PM]


Nevada Results by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 01:09:33 PM]


Colorado Results by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 01:07:19 PM]


1oz cannon balls by TeacherMan
[Today at 12:54:31 PM]


Back up camera by Alchase
[Today at 11:14:35 AM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by Alchase
[Today at 11:00:13 AM]


Heard of the blacktail coach? by Bogie85
[Today at 08:16:05 AM]


WDFW's new ship by Fidelk
[Today at 07:55:35 AM]


My Baker Goat Units by Keith494
[Yesterday at 11:08:59 PM]


May/June Trail Cam: Roosevelt Bull Elk & Blacktail Bucks with Promising Growth by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:41:24 PM]


Fawn dropped by carlyoungs
[Yesterday at 07:33:57 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal