Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: KFhunter on June 26, 2014, 10:37:26 AMQuote from: bobcat on June 26, 2014, 10:35:33 AMSo the 30 bp's the wolf huggers wanted would be 60 pair? Aren't you glad the WDFW didn't listen to them?Without management it'll be 100+Maybe so, but would a change in the wolf plan make any difference?
Quote from: bobcat on June 26, 2014, 10:35:33 AMSo the 30 bp's the wolf huggers wanted would be 60 pair? Aren't you glad the WDFW didn't listen to them?Without management it'll be 100+
So the 30 bp's the wolf huggers wanted would be 60 pair? Aren't you glad the WDFW didn't listen to them?
Quote from: bobcat on June 26, 2014, 10:39:35 AMQuote from: KFhunter on June 26, 2014, 10:37:26 AMQuote from: bobcat on June 26, 2014, 10:35:33 AMSo the 30 bp's the wolf huggers wanted would be 60 pair? Aren't you glad the WDFW didn't listen to them?Without management it'll be 100+Maybe so, but would a change in the wolf plan make any difference? Probably not much difference in the amount of wolves around. But I think it would help hunters feel better if the wolves were delisted and we could shoot them without getting arrested. It would be good PR for wdfw with hunters, but bad PR for wdfw with the wolf huggers. Seems like they'd rather piss off hunters than the wolf lover crowd. They are scared of HSUS, PETA, and the like..........but not worried about hunters.
They are scared of HSUS, PETA, and the like...
Quote from: KFhunter on June 26, 2014, 10:16:56 AMHad WDFW put out a reasonable wolf plan for WA it would still be that way, I’ve never seen a plan, especially a government plan, that couldn’t use some improvement. Sometimes that kind of plan needs lots of improvement. So what can be done? Can the plan be revised or changed?
Had WDFW put out a reasonable wolf plan for WA it would still be that way,