Free: Contests & Raffles.
Nobody wants to be that guy and go against the grain and have to wear the labels they put on you if you don't go with the herd. It's too bad because that is supposed to be what America is about.
Quote from: wolfbait on June 25, 2014, 07:59:29 AMQuote from: bearpaw on June 25, 2014, 07:07:02 AM RG, I totally agree with everything you just wrote, that was very well detailed and accurate. I do think we also have some good managers if they would get back to managing by unbiased science. It's getting tougher and tougher to find unbiased science. It's not good enough to just say that we need to manage by science, all of the anti-hunting and wolf groups are employing their own biologists and even some biologists working for F&G agencies seem to have an agenda other than providing for plentiful wildlife numbers of all species and greater opportunities for users of all types. What is the science, that is the new battlefield, groups claim they want management by science while at the same time attempting to skew the science to fit their agendas.well said sir x2 As I "contemplate the universe" it seems that somewhere we developed a shortage of people who are willing to step out from the group and say "I believe in doing what's is right, honest, and ethical even if it isn't popular". All the political correctness and niceness and other agendas have brought about a serious herd bound mentality it seems. Nobody wants to be that guy and go against the grain and have to wear the labels they put on you if you don't go with the herd. It's too bad because that is supposed to be what America is about. I appreciate people who do the cliche "right thing at the right time for the right reason" even if it means they bring opposition on themselves. We have taught the masses to be afraid of people like that.
Quote from: bearpaw on June 25, 2014, 07:07:02 AM RG, I totally agree with everything you just wrote, that was very well detailed and accurate. I do think we also have some good managers if they would get back to managing by unbiased science. It's getting tougher and tougher to find unbiased science. It's not good enough to just say that we need to manage by science, all of the anti-hunting and wolf groups are employing their own biologists and even some biologists working for F&G agencies seem to have an agenda other than providing for plentiful wildlife numbers of all species and greater opportunities for users of all types. What is the science, that is the new battlefield, groups claim they want management by science while at the same time attempting to skew the science to fit their agendas.well said sir x2
RG, I totally agree with everything you just wrote, that was very well detailed and accurate. I do think we also have some good managers if they would get back to managing by unbiased science. It's getting tougher and tougher to find unbiased science. It's not good enough to just say that we need to manage by science, all of the anti-hunting and wolf groups are employing their own biologists and even some biologists working for F&G agencies seem to have an agenda other than providing for plentiful wildlife numbers of all species and greater opportunities for users of all types. What is the science, that is the new battlefield, groups claim they want management by science while at the same time attempting to skew the science to fit their agendas.
