collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Skookumchuck continues decline  (Read 12695 times)

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Skookumchuck continues decline
« on: September 05, 2007, 09:43:24 AM »
 I asked the question of WDFW about the decline in recent years of the Skoomumchuck unit blacktail. Not good news! No cause has yet been identified for the decline, but this year is expected to be the same as last as far as harvest. I'm wondering if many of the deer used to range down into the Weyerhaeuser land's sold in the Yelm and Mineral areas totaling several thousand acres for new housing. If that's the case, we'll never see the 'glory days' again.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2007, 10:12:46 AM »
Maybe hair loss has had an affect?

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2007, 10:24:30 AM »
I think poaching is more of an issue around mineral lots of hard up folks in that neck of the woods :dunno:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2007, 10:41:13 AM »
 Hair slip has not been significantly noticed, according to the bio. I think poaching can be an issue outside of Vail proper, but within the mainlines I think it's minimal to nil. My gut tells me it's both habitat loss and overharvest just prior to the habitat loss, as well as 3 dry summers in a row.

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2007, 06:35:23 PM »
I agree with the habitat loss and over harvest. The logging, though still ongoing, is less than what it used to be and the cuts are growing into stands of timber therefore less feed. Building is a huge issue in this area as well.




Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1029
  • Location: SWW
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2007, 09:39:16 PM »
Are we talking population decline or harvest decline?
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2007, 09:39:51 PM »
 This is my theory on the last couple dry summers I hunted the Skook (excluding this summer). Doe's that are fawning in late spring have lower fawn survival rates when water is scarce and it forces them and their offspring to travel greater distances through coyote country in search of water.

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2007, 09:41:06 PM »
Are we talking population decline or harvest decline?

 Both since 2004.

Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1029
  • Location: SWW
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2007, 09:50:07 PM »
I agree with the summer theory.  As far as the habitat I don't see much of a change in the harvest of the Vail Tree Farm.  The mixed age of the timber seems to me to be fairly consistant.  Yes there are years that have a higher harvest then others, but it looks fairly even.  I think with a 2 point restriction (spikes can be taken by youth or antlerless permit) the Skook could be a premier blacktail unit.
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2007, 09:53:00 PM »
 A two point rule would be great for the Skook, I don't shoot spike's anyways. If the trend continues another year or so, it may very well happen.

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2007, 02:56:56 PM »
 Here's an article from last season.

http://www.theolympian.com/103/story/47042.html

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4811
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2007, 05:55:54 PM »
I would alos be in favor of at least a 2-point min restriction on that unit. I used to live (when I lived with my parents) about 10 minutes from the valley, and about 15 minutes from the E-130 gate. The amount of deer being seen has been declining for a number of years. I wish Weyerhauser would burn their clearcuts up there instead of leaving them dead with no food in them.

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1975
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2007, 09:41:41 PM »
2 point restriction would be the way to go,don't know if it will ever happen though. My property borders Vail, opening morning the headlights come over in a solid stream. what are they shootin'? Spikes. Let the geezers and youth kill spikes, everyone else forked horn or better.
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2007, 01:39:30 PM »
Some timber company's use herbicides that kill allot of foliage that the deer depend on for food.A 2-point min restriction would definitely be worth a try tho.
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2007, 04:21:00 PM »
 I saw a study on the use of herbicides done by DNR/ WDFW. Hancock came out as the worst, which I already knew from hiking the Snoqualmie, they definitely are using too heavy a mix from what I've seen with my own eyes (and smelled!). I've not noticed herbicede's at all in Vail, I think that they are so aggressive about planting/ burning the fresh cuts, that weeds don't really take hold as much. I know from being a WSDA licensed herbicides consultant for nearly ten years that many of the regulations have been relaxed too much in recent years. You don't want to know what is being sprayed around these days!!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

where is everyone? by Ridgeratt
[Today at 01:32:55 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Stein
[Today at 01:26:56 PM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by pickardjw
[Today at 01:04:06 PM]


Buck age by muleyslayer
[Today at 12:09:13 PM]


Guessing there will be a drop in whitatail archers by hunter399
[Today at 12:05:49 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Doublelunger
[Today at 11:06:28 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by Dhoey07
[Today at 06:54:48 AM]


Commercial crab pots going in today. by The scout
[Yesterday at 10:27:13 PM]


Missoula Fishing by jackelope
[Yesterday at 09:46:08 PM]


New fisher looking to catch some pinks this year by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 09:34:16 PM]


Desert Sheds by blindluck
[Yesterday at 09:03:55 PM]


10 kokes by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 07:05:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal