collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf in klickitat  (Read 37768 times)

Offline bigmacc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 6255
  • Location: the woods
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #75 on: July 29, 2014, 07:04:40 PM »
It's hard to believe because there is an extensive legal process they would be required to go through, before releasing wolves in this state. Just as they had to do in all the other states. Never did they secretly release wolves in those other states. And it's extremely unlikely they would have done so here,

Like I said before. Read the wolf plan. Does it say anything about wolves being released in Washington? No? Then it didn't happen.


With all due respect bobcat,how do we really know wolves were not "secretly" released here in this state or any other for that matter,not saying some were not released legally with proper protocol and some did not migrate or wander from point A to point B. There are alot of things done in goverment agencies within countrys all over the world that are kept "secret" and has been practiced for years. By definition the word "secret" is, "something kept hidden or unexplained...something kept from the knowledge of others".Its done all the time,or at least more than we know,after all if we did know about "secret" releases or anything trying to be "kept from the knowledge of others" then it wouldnt be a secret any more would it?. I,m kind of on the fence with this, lots of things have been done thru history that originally were supposed to have been kept hidden or kept from the knowledge of others. Not saying secret releases happened,just saying it wouldnt surprise me....as always,just my :twocents:
« Last Edit: July 29, 2014, 07:14:37 PM by bigmacc »

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #76 on: July 29, 2014, 07:18:46 PM »
Anything is possible but it's extremely unlikely, so I'm just going with the odds. If you think about it, the WDFW could have gotten more than enough support if they wanted to plant wolves in Washington. Us hunters are about the only people who don't want wolves here. Let's just say I bet 80% of the people in this state would support the WDFW in trying to re-establish wolves. So why would they try to hide it? They wouldn't. They'd be heroes to most people. Even if they did want to keep something secret, there's no way they could. Too many employees would be aware of it, and I guarantee at least one would not keep quiet.

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8829
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #77 on: July 29, 2014, 07:37:48 PM »

With all due respect bobcat,how do we really know wolves were not "secretly" released here in this state or any other for that matter,not saying some were not released legally with proper protocol and some did not migrate or wander from point A to point B. There are alot of things done in goverment agencies within countrys all over the world that are kept "secret" and has been practiced for years. By definition the word "secret" is, "something kept hidden or unexplained...something kept from the knowledge of others".Its done all the time,or at least more than we know,after all if we did know about "secret" releases or anything trying to be "kept from the knowledge of others" then it wouldnt be a secret any more would it?. I,m kind of on the fence with this, lots of things have been done thru history that originally were supposed to have been kept hidden or kept from the knowledge of others. Not saying secret releases happened,just saying it wouldnt surprise me....as always,just my :twocents:

Challenging one's opponent in any sort of debate to "prove a negative" is decidedly weak.  Prove that JFK, Pope JP II and Ronald Reagan are in fact dead, and not plotting a scheme for world domination from the ISS.

You can't, so it must be true, right?

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2674
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #78 on: July 29, 2014, 07:39:48 PM »

With all due respect bobcat,how do we really know wolves were not "secretly" released here in this state or any other for that matter,not saying some were not released legally with proper protocol and some did not migrate or wander from point A to point B. There are alot of things done in goverment agencies within countrys all over the world that are kept "secret" and has been practiced for years. By definition the word "secret" is, "something kept hidden or unexplained...something kept from the knowledge of others".Its done all the time,or at least more than we know,after all if we did know about "secret" releases or anything trying to be "kept from the knowledge of others" then it wouldnt be a secret any more would it?. I,m kind of on the fence with this, lots of things have been done thru history that originally were supposed to have been kept hidden or kept from the knowledge of others. Not saying secret releases happened,just saying it wouldnt surprise me....as always,just my :twocents:


Challenging one's opponent in any sort of debate to "prove a negative" is decidedly weak.  Prove that JFK, Pope JP II and Ronald Reagan are in fact dead, and not plotting a scheme for world domination from the ISS.

You can't, so it must be true, right?

Ronnie's dead  :dunno:   :cryriver:
« Last Edit: July 29, 2014, 09:58:58 PM by Wazukie »
Matthew 6:33

Offline westside bull

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 485
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #79 on: July 30, 2014, 06:38:21 AM »
Anything is possible but it's extremely unlikely, so I'm just going with the odds. If you think about it, the WDFW could have gotten more than enough support if they wanted to plant wolves in Washington. Us hunters are about the only people who don't want wolves here. Let's just say I bet 80% of the people in this state would support the WDFW in trying to re-establish wolves. So why would they try to hide it? They wouldn't. They'd be heroes to most people. Even if they did want to keep something secret, there's no way they could. Too many employees would be aware of it, and I guarantee at least one would not keep quiet.
Even if it was true do you think one of there employees would go public and say something like with there name and face and tell people they work for wdfw and they re-established wolves here no rumors are rumors and to many think they have re-established wolves here and that will not change. I think us the hunters pay there bills so yes why not keep it quite! :twocents:

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44826
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #80 on: July 30, 2014, 06:52:59 AM »
So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves. According to the approved wolf plan, a pack is required for the southern Cascades as part of the overall plan toward completion and eventual management. Because this is a requirement of the plan and we can't start management until the plan has been completed, what's the difference?

Don't get me wrong. I don't think there should be a wolf plan that includes a total of 15 packs, including one in the So. Cascades. I'd prefer something more reasonable, like 5 packs, all in someone else's neighborhood. But since the unreasonable wolf plan was approved by the Wildlife Commission and the USFWS, whether they were dropped off or whether they made it there all on their own, we're that much closer to being able to kill them. In the big scheme of things it doesn't matter how they got there.

One last point: If you can show photographic proof that this happened or is happening, we could have the added bonus of sending these wolf lovers to prison for breaking the law. At the very least, it would cost them their jobs and lots of money. If you haven't taken your camera or phone into the woods before, you should be doing it every time now.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #81 on: July 30, 2014, 07:04:48 AM »
"If you haven't taken your camera or phone into the woods before, you should be doing it every time now."

I agree.  I ALWAYS have a camera with me.  I dont always have time to get a pic but I try. Often im rewarded with some decent pics. 
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #82 on: July 30, 2014, 10:33:51 AM »
So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves. According to the approved wolf plan, a pack is required for the southern Cascades as part of the overall plan toward completion and eventual management. Because this is a requirement of the plan and we can't start management until the plan has been completed, what's the difference?

Don't get me wrong. I don't think there should be a wolf plan that includes a total of 15 packs, including one in the So. Cascades. I'd prefer something more reasonable, like 5 packs, all in someone else's neighborhood. But since the unreasonable wolf plan was approved by the Wildlife Commission and the USFWS, whether they were dropped off or whether they made it there all on their own, we're that much closer to being able to kill them. In the big scheme of things it doesn't matter how they got there.

One last point: If you can show photographic proof that this happened or is happening, we could have the added bonus of sending these wolf lovers to prison for breaking the law. At the very least, it would cost them their jobs and lots of money. If you haven't taken your camera or phone into the woods before, you should be doing it every time now.

"So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves."

Your getting out there a little bit Pianoman! :chuckle:   No black helicopters! Dark green pickups with government plates are what has been seen in many of the wolf releases. And as recently as last year pulling a flat bed trailer with wolves in those little metal crates, very early in the morning.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #83 on: July 30, 2014, 10:47:50 AM »
So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves. According to the approved wolf plan, a pack is required for the southern Cascades as part of the overall plan toward completion and eventual management. Because this is a requirement of the plan and we can't start management until the plan has been completed, what's the difference?

Don't get me wrong. I don't think there should be a wolf plan that includes a total of 15 packs, including one in the So. Cascades. I'd prefer something more reasonable, like 5 packs, all in someone else's neighborhood. But since the unreasonable wolf plan was approved by the Wildlife Commission and the USFWS, whether they were dropped off or whether they made it there all on their own, we're that much closer to being able to kill them. In the big scheme of things it doesn't matter how they got there.

One last point: If you can show photographic proof that this happened or is happening, we could have the added bonus of sending these wolf lovers to prison for breaking the law. At the very least, it would cost them their jobs and lots of money. If you haven't taken your camera or phone into the woods before, you should be doing it every time now.

"So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves."

Your getting out there a little bit Pianoman! :chuckle:   No black helicopters! Dark green pickups with government plates are what has been seen in many of the wolf releases. And as recently as last year pulling a flat bed trailer with wolves in those little metal crates, very early in the morning.

Why do I always think of this when you write that?

http://www.conconullysupermush.com/

Lots of wolfy looking dogs could be hauled around like that and some remote locations are ideal for conditioning snow or no snow.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #84 on: July 30, 2014, 10:57:05 AM »
So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves. According to the approved wolf plan, a pack is required for the southern Cascades as part of the overall plan toward completion and eventual management. Because this is a requirement of the plan and we can't start management until the plan has been completed, what's the difference?

Don't get me wrong. I don't think there should be a wolf plan that includes a total of 15 packs, including one in the So. Cascades. I'd prefer something more reasonable, like 5 packs, all in someone else's neighborhood. But since the unreasonable wolf plan was approved by the Wildlife Commission and the USFWS, whether they were dropped off or whether they made it there all on their own, we're that much closer to being able to kill them. In the big scheme of things it doesn't matter how they got there.

One last point: If you can show photographic proof that this happened or is happening, we could have the added bonus of sending these wolf lovers to prison for breaking the law. At the very least, it would cost them their jobs and lots of money. If you haven't taken your camera or phone into the woods before, you should be doing it every time now.

"So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves."

Your getting out there a little bit Pianoman! :chuckle:   No black helicopters! Dark green pickups with government plates are what has been seen in many of the wolf releases. And as recently as last year pulling a flat bed trailer with wolves in those little metal crates, very early in the morning.

Why do I always think of this when you write that?

http://www.conconullysupermush.com/

Lots of wolfy looking dogs could be hauled around like that and some remote locations are ideal for conditioning snow or no snow.

WDFW have sled dogs? Really? Do you suppose they were taking them out for some exercise last summer?

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #85 on: July 30, 2014, 10:59:39 AM »
So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves. According to the approved wolf plan, a pack is required for the southern Cascades as part of the overall plan toward completion and eventual management. Because this is a requirement of the plan and we can't start management until the plan has been completed, what's the difference?

Don't get me wrong. I don't think there should be a wolf plan that includes a total of 15 packs, including one in the So. Cascades. I'd prefer something more reasonable, like 5 packs, all in someone else's neighborhood. But since the unreasonable wolf plan was approved by the Wildlife Commission and the USFWS, whether they were dropped off or whether they made it there all on their own, we're that much closer to being able to kill them. In the big scheme of things it doesn't matter how they got there.

One last point: If you can show photographic proof that this happened or is happening, we could have the added bonus of sending these wolf lovers to prison for breaking the law. At the very least, it would cost them their jobs and lots of money. If you haven't taken your camera or phone into the woods before, you should be doing it every time now.

"So let's just say for a moment that the unmarked black helicopters came in and dropped off some wolves."

Your getting out there a little bit Pianoman! :chuckle:   No black helicopters! Dark green pickups with government plates are what has been seen in many of the wolf releases. And as recently as last year pulling a flat bed trailer with wolves in those little metal crates, very early in the morning.

Why do I always think of this when you write that?

http://www.conconullysupermush.com/

Lots of wolfy looking dogs could be hauled around like that and some remote locations are ideal for conditioning snow or no snow.

WDFW have sled dogs? Really? Do you suppose they were taking them out for some exercise last summer?

Get some pictures or video and I'll start listening. Be sure to include the date and time taken, and try to get the plate number and logo on the side of the truck. Until then I think a lot of these stories are either made up or from people not understanding what they are seeing.

(sled dogs get run year round, snow or no snow)

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #86 on: July 30, 2014, 11:12:22 AM »
I will make a sizable bet that people see what they want to see when a truck like this drives by in the woods. Change the color to green and they won't even bother to read what's on the side.


Offline bigmacc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 6255
  • Location: the woods
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #87 on: July 30, 2014, 11:14:56 AM »
Anything is possible but it's extremely unlikely, so I'm just going with the odds. If you think about it, the WDFW could have gotten more than enough support if they wanted to plant wolves in Washington. Us hunters are about the only people who don't want wolves here. Let's just say I bet 80% of the people in this state would support the WDFW in trying to re-establish wolves. So why would they try to hide it? They wouldn't. They'd be heroes to most people. Even if they did want to keep something secret, there's no way they could. Too many employees would be aware of it, and I guarantee at least one would not keep quiet.

Yes anything is possible,some are probable,some are likely or unlikely you name it, but  everyone has ideas about this "how did they get here" deal and the fact COULD be that all of them could be right to a certain degree. For my statement of "it wouldnt surprise me" if wolves were released into some areas here and there all comes from an accidental encounter with the game dept way up the Swakane in early december of 1969 or 70?. A bunch of unmarked rigs and a big box truck sitting at the end of the road with a bunch of bighorns spilling out of the box truck,a bunch of guys were on us pretty quickly when they spotted us and in short we were told "we didnt see anything". These are the sort of things that have happened to myself and others to various degrees that can make a guy a little skeptical i guess. I,m in the camp though that they are here, however it may be, so lets get em delisted asap!

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #88 on: July 30, 2014, 11:27:15 AM »
If WDFW is transplanting wolves, why don't they just drop off packs in the Olympics and SW Washington and anywhere else that "needs" more wolves?

And like what has been asked before, why risk prison time by illegally releasing wolves?   And another thing.......If they really were transplanting them, why wouldn't they be more discreet?  I would think they could use vehicles that don't look like government trucks.  ???  Nothing about wdfw secretly planting wolves makes any sense...........I'm going to just have to continue to believe that wolves are naturally dispersing unless some evidence can show otherwise.   I mean no disrespect to wolfbait or others that believe in those conspiracy theories,  but the stories are just too hard to believe right now.......though if more evidence surfaces to show otherwise,  I'm open to changing my mind.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolf in klickitat
« Reply #89 on: July 30, 2014, 11:30:09 AM »
If WDFW is transplanting wolves, why don't they just drop off packs in the Olympics and SW Washington and anywhere else that "needs" more wolves?

And like what has been asked before, why risk prison time by illegally releasing wolves?   And another thing.......If they really were transplanting them, why wouldn't they be more discreet?  I would think they could use vehicles that don't look like government trucks.  ???  Nothing about wdfw secretly planting wolves makes any sense...........I'm going to just have to continue to believe that wolves are naturally dispersing unless some evidence can show otherwise.   I mean no disrespect to wolfbait or others that believe in those conspiracy theories,  but the stories are just too hard to believe right now.......though if more evidence to show otherwise,  I'm open to changing my mind.

It needs to be something more than a picture of an "unmarked truck" too. Plenty of guys haul bird dogs and sled dogs around with fairly sophisticated setups.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hunting bears in the thick stuff by ghosthunter
[Today at 04:33:46 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by ASHQUACK
[Today at 04:15:14 PM]


3 days for Kings by metlhead
[Today at 03:33:48 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by luvmystang67
[Today at 02:42:36 PM]


2025 Canning by Twispriver
[Today at 02:13:36 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by Deer slayer
[Today at 01:51:26 PM]


GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by Ridgerunner
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


Best all around muzzy (updated) by CamoDup
[Today at 09:41:58 AM]


Full moon and last week of September by vandeman17
[Today at 08:49:49 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by CaNINE
[Today at 05:52:10 AM]


2025 Crab! by spin05
[Today at 05:11:11 AM]


Lynx kittens confirmed in the Kettle Range by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 11:21:59 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 10:29:26 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Yesterday at 08:03:44 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal