Author Topic: Primos Ultra 35 (Read 4172 times)

bobcat · « **on:** July 27, 2014, 11:45:11 PM »

Just got a couple of these Primos Ultra 35's. Got one put up a couple weeks ago not far from home, just to test it out. Was expecting elk, but got nothing but deer. A couple of decent blacktails so I wasn't too disappointed. I'm really happy with the camera so far. Simple to use and the sensor seems to be really sensitive; it doesn't miss anything.

Antlershed · « **Reply #1 on:** July 28, 2014, 07:54:42 PM »

Nice pics! Wish I wouldn't have drug my feet on buying a couple of them.

bobcat · « **Reply #2 on:** July 28, 2014, 07:58:54 PM »

You didn't get any? Man, I wish I would have got ten at that price. But I only got three. The pictures aren't quite as nice as I get with my Moultrue M80, but for $25, I'm certainly not complaining.

Bean Counter · « **Reply #3 on:** July 28, 2014, 08:00:14 PM »

Thanks for sharing as always.

How do these compare with the "regular" Truth 35s? Just smaller?

These were $25??where??

bobcat · « **Reply #4 on:** July 28, 2014, 08:06:38 PM »

They were $25 but now the price is $115.

Yes, smaller, and take AAs instead of D's.

Pictures are slightly better too.

elk247 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 28, 2014, 08:26:42 PM »

I have the "regular" truth 35 and with all due respect these pictures aren't any better than the ones I got. But they aren't any worse either. With a $25 dollar price tag I would have bought 6-8 of them. Wish I was in the know. I also have a wild game innovations camera that I paid more for than the promos camera and it isn't nearly as good as the truth cam.

bobcat · « **Reply #6 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:25:45 PM »

Let it soak for another three weeks and when I checked it today I had over 1,300 pictures.

And that's without any bait or attractant. The elk finally showed themselves. No branch antler bulls though. Again, these aren't the greatest pictures but I still really like this camera. It takes a ton of pictures and doesn't seem to miss anything. As you'll see, I do get some dark pictures when the camera should be switching over the the IR flash, it seems to wait a little too long.

I put down about 25 pounds of apples so next time probably should have at least as many pictures as I got this time.

Here's a sampling of what I got:

bobcat · « **Reply #7 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:32:29 PM »

bobcat · « **Reply #8 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:34:15 PM »

bobcat · « **Reply #9 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:35:49 PM »

bobcat · « **Reply #10 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:37:20 PM »

bobcat · « **Reply #11 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:38:50 PM »

bobcat · « **Reply #12 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:40:23 PM »

HntnFsh · « **Reply #13 on:** August 18, 2014, 05:54:03 AM »

I think you got your moneys worth Bob!

billythekidrock · « **Reply #14 on:** August 18, 2014, 05:59:37 AM »

Bob,
Should of called, I have a bag of cob we could have put back there.

billythekidrock · « **Reply #15 on:** August 18, 2014, 06:23:33 AM »

What about the cam farther back? Any action on it?

AKBowman · « **Reply #16 on:** August 19, 2014, 10:24:17 PM »

I would rather have a camera than doesn't miss anything and takes average pics than a camera that has a slower or less accurate trigger and takes great pics. I use the smaller IR Tascos that take 4 AA batts. I used to be able to find them at Walmart for $49 but they relabeled them Bushnell and now they are $89 every where I look. Those are awesome cams. Great battery life, dependable sensors, good night time pics and amazing day pic quality, small and light too.

I have the older Truthcam 35 that takes 4 D cells. It's a fine camera but I wouldn't want to lug 4 of them loaded with batts 6 miles back and 2,500' up from the gate.

News:

Advertisement

Author Topic: Primos Ultra 35 (Read 4172 times)

Advertisement

Quick Links

Recent Topics