Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: grundy53 on September 25, 2014, 03:24:58 PMQuote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 03:17:47 PMQuote from: grundy53 on September 25, 2014, 03:10:14 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on September 25, 2014, 02:53:44 PMQuote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 02:45:48 PMI know this thread took a turn but I was a little surprised that nobody was concerned that damage hunt information is not being reported. Especially given the level of harvest last year under the guise of damage in the Skagit. I think there's a difference between the damage hunt not being reported and those numbers not being considered by the bios when making management decisions. Whereas, without reporting, we may not know the numbers but the WDFW does. I'm not sure that it's that big of a deal. I'd find it hard to believe that the scientists/bios aren't using that data in season planning, tag planning, future damage tag distribution, etc. Also, it's kind of a departure from the thread. Maybe a new thread is in order? I'm sure they are using this information in the season setting proccess. Whereas they can only quess with most tribal harvest.Interesting that you can assume that the state is utilizing this information for management, but you assume the tribal harvest is bogus? (referring to the westside reports not Yakima)I find assuming dangerous. If you re read what I said I didn't say anything about westside tribes only. I included ALL tribes. Some of the biggest tribal harvests or harvest that have the most affect on critical herds are from tribes that don't report.I find it amusing that you have the gall to tell me assuming is dangerous then YOU procede to assume that I'm talking about only westside tribes. That is my fault I guess, I didn't follow my own rule and assumed we were talking about the unreported harvest in the Skagit where tribes do report harvest.
Quote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 03:17:47 PMQuote from: grundy53 on September 25, 2014, 03:10:14 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on September 25, 2014, 02:53:44 PMQuote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 02:45:48 PMI know this thread took a turn but I was a little surprised that nobody was concerned that damage hunt information is not being reported. Especially given the level of harvest last year under the guise of damage in the Skagit. I think there's a difference between the damage hunt not being reported and those numbers not being considered by the bios when making management decisions. Whereas, without reporting, we may not know the numbers but the WDFW does. I'm not sure that it's that big of a deal. I'd find it hard to believe that the scientists/bios aren't using that data in season planning, tag planning, future damage tag distribution, etc. Also, it's kind of a departure from the thread. Maybe a new thread is in order? I'm sure they are using this information in the season setting proccess. Whereas they can only quess with most tribal harvest.Interesting that you can assume that the state is utilizing this information for management, but you assume the tribal harvest is bogus? (referring to the westside reports not Yakima)I find assuming dangerous. If you re read what I said I didn't say anything about westside tribes only. I included ALL tribes. Some of the biggest tribal harvests or harvest that have the most affect on critical herds are from tribes that don't report.I find it amusing that you have the gall to tell me assuming is dangerous then YOU procede to assume that I'm talking about only westside tribes.
Quote from: grundy53 on September 25, 2014, 03:10:14 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on September 25, 2014, 02:53:44 PMQuote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 02:45:48 PMI know this thread took a turn but I was a little surprised that nobody was concerned that damage hunt information is not being reported. Especially given the level of harvest last year under the guise of damage in the Skagit. I think there's a difference between the damage hunt not being reported and those numbers not being considered by the bios when making management decisions. Whereas, without reporting, we may not know the numbers but the WDFW does. I'm not sure that it's that big of a deal. I'd find it hard to believe that the scientists/bios aren't using that data in season planning, tag planning, future damage tag distribution, etc. Also, it's kind of a departure from the thread. Maybe a new thread is in order? I'm sure they are using this information in the season setting proccess. Whereas they can only quess with most tribal harvest.Interesting that you can assume that the state is utilizing this information for management, but you assume the tribal harvest is bogus? (referring to the westside reports not Yakima)I find assuming dangerous.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on September 25, 2014, 02:53:44 PMQuote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 02:45:48 PMI know this thread took a turn but I was a little surprised that nobody was concerned that damage hunt information is not being reported. Especially given the level of harvest last year under the guise of damage in the Skagit. I think there's a difference between the damage hunt not being reported and those numbers not being considered by the bios when making management decisions. Whereas, without reporting, we may not know the numbers but the WDFW does. I'm not sure that it's that big of a deal. I'd find it hard to believe that the scientists/bios aren't using that data in season planning, tag planning, future damage tag distribution, etc. Also, it's kind of a departure from the thread. Maybe a new thread is in order? I'm sure they are using this information in the season setting proccess. Whereas they can only quess with most tribal harvest.
Quote from: Practical Approach on September 25, 2014, 02:45:48 PMI know this thread took a turn but I was a little surprised that nobody was concerned that damage hunt information is not being reported. Especially given the level of harvest last year under the guise of damage in the Skagit. I think there's a difference between the damage hunt not being reported and those numbers not being considered by the bios when making management decisions. Whereas, without reporting, we may not know the numbers but the WDFW does. I'm not sure that it's that big of a deal. I'd find it hard to believe that the scientists/bios aren't using that data in season planning, tag planning, future damage tag distribution, etc. Also, it's kind of a departure from the thread. Maybe a new thread is in order?
I know this thread took a turn but I was a little surprised that nobody was concerned that damage hunt information is not being reported. Especially given the level of harvest last year under the guise of damage in the Skagit.
You know what I get tired of reading and hearing.........I'm sick of the truckloads, I'm sick of unequal rights, I'm tired of tribal poaching, etc etc etc................if people are so tired then step up with documentation, statements pictures anything that you will back upRant on................
I thought I did reply in it? I did however save the pic from that thread.
Quote from: PlateauNDN on September 25, 2014, 04:40:50 PMI thought I did reply in it? I did however save the pic from that thread.Originally posted in June
Quote from: huntnphool on September 25, 2014, 04:43:43 PMQuote from: PlateauNDN on September 25, 2014, 04:40:50 PMI thought I did reply in it? I did however save the pic from that thread.Originally posted in JuneTheir season for bull elk is year around, NO LIMIT.
I've checked around and I haven't been able to locate who the person is or what they were hunting for.
Ok, so what does day, time and driving down the highway have to do with identifying the person? Again, it appears to be legal so what are you expecting??? Oh wait, let me get my magic wand and wish something illegal to happen...........I save my favors for incidents that have the high probability of being illegal so I don't waste anybodies time in l.e. I'm not going above and beyond if there's no possibility of illegal activity.......