collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Bold' wolf that bit researcher weighed 100 pounds, records show; most attacks n  (Read 15063 times)

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
I think "negotiations" is irrelevant.  Without lawsuits (threat of force) and other means that costs the State more than anti-hunting groups pay for their political agenda it's irrelevant.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3610
Until they fear pro-hunting more than anti-hunting this is worthless. This isn't about biology or ecosystems, it's politics. Hunters eat their own. It's our fault. It's why we loose.
Almost their entire existence is based on hunting...hunters suing pro-hunting agencies is not going to help. I do agree wolf stuff is mostly politics.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
I think you are actually right idaho. I honestly do. But the politics are what have to be attacked. Take Idaho, (the state) wolves were pushed on IDFG. But now their liberal tags and season,  that I support.  WDFW is not IDFG. The politics behind it is the problem. Those who support hunting, trapping,  private gun ownership need to viciously and with zeal support what we do. The North American Model of game management.  Defenders, CNW, and HSUS have no interest in management.  Only politics, and I will discuss them as such.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3610
Oh, I definitely agree the politics in WA is what the problem is...wdfw is in a much more difficult position for managing wolves than idaho was...at least once they were federally de-listed.  I just don't think wdfw inherently wants to let these greenie groups drive management decisions...but politically they are forced to.  So I agree the fight must be political...as in getting broad voter support on important issues like lethal wolf management.  Im just not sure suing wdfw is the answer...maybe a bunch of people can sue those greenie groups and keep them pre-occupied in court and away from wildlife management issues  :dunno:  :chuckle:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
They will never ever vote to allow hunting of wolves. They will sue to stop it. Even government agencies killing dangerous or problem wolves, King County and political pressure will not allow it. Lawsuits,  because they make more off of fishing.  I'd bet a dollar it is the fear of lawsuits that drives wolf management.   That, and special interest grease. (Politics)
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
WDFW deserves all the criticism it gets by having CNW members sit on their commission and by accepting funds from various groups to bolster their reward for wolf poaching, range riders and other "wolf deterrents".   They make livestock owners enter into a binding agreement that's full of red tape and beurocracy then give unfettered access to HSUS type groups to run around their private property. 

Then once all the deterrents fail they openly mock and criticize the livestock owner who just a week prior was "very cooperative with WDFW and various NGO groups" next thing you know they got 200 sheep gone and now have to foot the bill to find new grazing range and only get compensated for something like 18 animals.  No compensation for all the fuel, manpower, loss of private grazing lands, 186 sheep unaccounted for and the PTSD like suffering of the rest of the sheep, aborted lambs, open and unbred ewes the list goes on and on.  That sheep owner is lucky to see 2% compensation for his real losses.

Yet they won't take money from the Cattlemen's association to help collar and track wolves.  :bash:  :bash:  :bash:


Yes, HSUS is the enemy; and WDFW is their enabler and co-conspirator.

No, HSUS and their affiliates is the enabler and the enemy. They front the money that gets people into positions that matter. What happens at WDFW is largely a direct result of that.

Money buys influence and power.
Correct...but given those tremendous obstacles by HSUS et al., wdfw has still managed to be tougher on wolves than any of those groups and their politicians would like.  Sportsmen ought not to turn their backs on an agency that is fighting the good fight in a difficult and challenging political arena.

You're funny. I've got your good fight right here. Their (the WDFW's) outrageous wolf plan is the reason management hasn't begun already with the confirmed 13 packs and estimated 16. We should have a wolf season now. It's their fault we don't. You know it, too. But we all know that your unending love for the wolf and your favorite government institution is never-faltering.

Who influences WDFW or the people who tell them what to do? Again, who is the puppeteer? It's not WDFW, it's HSUS and their affiliates that are calling the shots via their influence and money. Change that dynamic and you'll see WDFW get more teeth on the matter.

If what you're saying is true, then the entire WDFW administration should be fired for not knowing to whom they're responsible. Going after the HSUS will do no good. But proving a government agency is making wildlife management decisions based on the wishes of an organization from MI and getting them all fired for it just might. Either way, the WDFW is responsible for this mess and for ignoring the needs of our citizens who are affected by it.

HSUS is headquartered in Washington D.C, not Michigan. There is a reason for that, so they can lobby politicians. Money = influence

Take them out and the politics will change.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Got a great deal on a jet sled by huntnphool
[Today at 12:42:36 AM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 11:49:14 PM]


Idaho Non-res hunt draw by Broomd
[Yesterday at 11:37:10 PM]


Eastern Elk Management by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 10:37:48 PM]


The first Moose tags. by tracksoup
[Yesterday at 10:14:29 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 09:43:00 PM]


Coyote hunting with dogs by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 08:12:09 PM]


3 pintails by YoungFowler
[Yesterday at 07:17:53 PM]


One of my favorites this fall by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 06:29:49 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 06:24:02 PM]


From Behind by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:28:41 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by CP
[Yesterday at 04:32:25 PM]


My Wenaha bull by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 03:29:46 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 03:24:18 PM]


My daughters first deer. by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 03:22:51 PM]


Looking for Red Hot Replacement Muzzleloader Nipple 2 SKU: M900013 by Westside88
[Yesterday at 03:10:28 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 02:23:56 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 01:42:33 PM]


Moose in western washington? by Okanagan
[Yesterday at 01:06:31 PM]


Last day! Don’t leave us hanging by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 01:03:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal