collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Bold' wolf that bit researcher weighed 100 pounds, records show; most attacks n  (Read 14262 times)

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
I think "negotiations" is irrelevant.  Without lawsuits (threat of force) and other means that costs the State more than anti-hunting groups pay for their political agenda it's irrelevant.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3601
Until they fear pro-hunting more than anti-hunting this is worthless. This isn't about biology or ecosystems, it's politics. Hunters eat their own. It's our fault. It's why we loose.
Almost their entire existence is based on hunting...hunters suing pro-hunting agencies is not going to help. I do agree wolf stuff is mostly politics.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
I think you are actually right idaho. I honestly do. But the politics are what have to be attacked. Take Idaho, (the state) wolves were pushed on IDFG. But now their liberal tags and season,  that I support.  WDFW is not IDFG. The politics behind it is the problem. Those who support hunting, trapping,  private gun ownership need to viciously and with zeal support what we do. The North American Model of game management.  Defenders, CNW, and HSUS have no interest in management.  Only politics, and I will discuss them as such.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3601
Oh, I definitely agree the politics in WA is what the problem is...wdfw is in a much more difficult position for managing wolves than idaho was...at least once they were federally de-listed.  I just don't think wdfw inherently wants to let these greenie groups drive management decisions...but politically they are forced to.  So I agree the fight must be political...as in getting broad voter support on important issues like lethal wolf management.  Im just not sure suing wdfw is the answer...maybe a bunch of people can sue those greenie groups and keep them pre-occupied in court and away from wildlife management issues  :dunno:  :chuckle:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
They will never ever vote to allow hunting of wolves. They will sue to stop it. Even government agencies killing dangerous or problem wolves, King County and political pressure will not allow it. Lawsuits,  because they make more off of fishing.  I'd bet a dollar it is the fear of lawsuits that drives wolf management.   That, and special interest grease. (Politics)
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
WDFW deserves all the criticism it gets by having CNW members sit on their commission and by accepting funds from various groups to bolster their reward for wolf poaching, range riders and other "wolf deterrents".   They make livestock owners enter into a binding agreement that's full of red tape and beurocracy then give unfettered access to HSUS type groups to run around their private property. 

Then once all the deterrents fail they openly mock and criticize the livestock owner who just a week prior was "very cooperative with WDFW and various NGO groups" next thing you know they got 200 sheep gone and now have to foot the bill to find new grazing range and only get compensated for something like 18 animals.  No compensation for all the fuel, manpower, loss of private grazing lands, 186 sheep unaccounted for and the PTSD like suffering of the rest of the sheep, aborted lambs, open and unbred ewes the list goes on and on.  That sheep owner is lucky to see 2% compensation for his real losses.

Yet they won't take money from the Cattlemen's association to help collar and track wolves.  :bash:  :bash:  :bash:


Yes, HSUS is the enemy; and WDFW is their enabler and co-conspirator.

No, HSUS and their affiliates is the enabler and the enemy. They front the money that gets people into positions that matter. What happens at WDFW is largely a direct result of that.

Money buys influence and power.
Correct...but given those tremendous obstacles by HSUS et al., wdfw has still managed to be tougher on wolves than any of those groups and their politicians would like.  Sportsmen ought not to turn their backs on an agency that is fighting the good fight in a difficult and challenging political arena.

You're funny. I've got your good fight right here. Their (the WDFW's) outrageous wolf plan is the reason management hasn't begun already with the confirmed 13 packs and estimated 16. We should have a wolf season now. It's their fault we don't. You know it, too. But we all know that your unending love for the wolf and your favorite government institution is never-faltering.

Who influences WDFW or the people who tell them what to do? Again, who is the puppeteer? It's not WDFW, it's HSUS and their affiliates that are calling the shots via their influence and money. Change that dynamic and you'll see WDFW get more teeth on the matter.

If what you're saying is true, then the entire WDFW administration should be fired for not knowing to whom they're responsible. Going after the HSUS will do no good. But proving a government agency is making wildlife management decisions based on the wishes of an organization from MI and getting them all fired for it just might. Either way, the WDFW is responsible for this mess and for ignoring the needs of our citizens who are affected by it.

HSUS is headquartered in Washington D.C, not Michigan. There is a reason for that, so they can lobby politicians. Money = influence

Take them out and the politics will change.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Desert Sheds by MADMAX
[Today at 11:25:33 AM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Today at 11:18:49 AM]


Last year putting in… by JimmyHoffa
[Today at 11:07:02 AM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by fishngamereaper
[Today at 10:16:54 AM]


Oregon spring bear by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:54:52 AM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by follow maggie
[Today at 09:08:20 AM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 08:25:26 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


F250 or Silverado 2500? by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 01:39:14 PM]


Is FS70 open? by yajsab
[Yesterday at 10:13:07 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal