collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville  (Read 29792 times)

Online Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3395
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #60 on: October 09, 2014, 12:02:41 AM »
  It's just amazing how selfish and unsympathetic people are that have "no skin in the game".
  By the way, I do have livestock "skin in the game" and am a Wildlife Biologist.

I'm no Wildlife Biologist, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.......  :rolleyes:
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline mkcj

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Seatac/Winthrop,Wash
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #61 on: October 09, 2014, 12:28:48 AM »
"Others suggested transplanting wolves from northeast Washington to other parts of the state. “Trap them and transplant them to Western Washington,” one woman said, to audience cheers."

"Relocating wolves would be a costly endeavor, requiring federal and state review, said Steve Pozzanghera, the department’s eastern regional director"

BS! they know where every den site is for every pack, trapping would be much easier and less costly then shooting them. Then the wolf lovers on the west side can enjoy them also.



Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #62 on: October 09, 2014, 05:54:05 AM »
A gal spoke and asked why did you spend over 50,000 of my money to kill 4 wolves in the Huckleberry pack with helicopters and only got one because it was too brushy and they wouldn't move into the open.  She said that their are local hunters who know the area, know how to get the job done that would have done it for free. Answer; we don't have the numbers to issue TAGS. She said, you don't understand I'm not talking tags I'm talking shooters that are way cheaper then helicopters that will get the job done. Answer; No tags or permits at this time. WOW, I understand these people have their hands tied by the westside, but they could have said anything other than no tags or permits. They could have said, we will take that idea back to OLY. BTW, they said helicopters are the best way to take out wolves and they scare them out of the area. They said after the helicopters were used on the Huckleberry pack they were pushed onto the Reservation which is a no fly zone for the WDFW.   

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #63 on: October 09, 2014, 06:06:13 AM »
Letter to Nate and the Commission, copied reps and senator:

"Dear Mr. Pamplin and Members of the Wildlife Commission,

As you most likely know, I'm a Master Hunter, a member of several conservation groups, and a member of an active member online forum which has in excess of 16,000 members. I'd like to know a few things about the recent transfer of a captured problem female wild wolf to Wolf Haven. 1. Was or will this wolf be spayed to avoid breeding with other species or hybrids? 2. Was DNA profiling done on this wolf for use in possible future examinations or investigations? 3. Is there a program set up to monitor the life of this wolf at the facility to ensure it doesn't accidentally escape and become a problem in another part of the state?

There are many people who don't understand this transfer. The appearance of a relationship between the WDFW and and activist pro-wolf organization is definitely raising some eyebrows in the hunting and farming/ranching communities. In addition, as far as I can tell, no such transfer is outlined in the Wolf Plan and questions are being raised as to whether this transfer was 4. Even allowed under the program, 5. the decision of one person, or that of a group of people, and 6. who that person or people are. I'd like to get answers to all of these questions in a timely manner please. Feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration of my request."
The question was asked about wolf haven and this wolf. They told the story about the two wolves running w/a local dog and one got bread. They spayed one and collared them. This one has become a problem and with all the advice from all groups the Director made the decision to give this wolf to wolf haven. Alot of comments came from the crowd that the wolf should have been shot. Someone asked what happened to the other wolf? They said it got hit by a car and the crowd got up and clapped. Also, someone said this is a wild wolf, it will suffer in captivity and pace back and forth along the fence. They said if this doesn't work, it will be put down.   

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44807
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #64 on: October 09, 2014, 06:15:48 AM »
They're in over their heads and gasping for air, and it's their fault. All of the evidence was there for them and they listened to the greenies to form the plan. They don't know how to control the wolves. They don't know how to control the people they listened to in the beginning. I would feel bad for them but thousands of people told them this would happen. Who I feel bad for are the people who have to live and earn a living in this mess.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1396
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #65 on: October 09, 2014, 06:24:46 AM »
Quote
After speaking with someone very involved with the wolf program, he indicated the the WDFW is doing what they can to manage the wolves in the face of fierce opposition from the pro-wolf groups. He did say that if there were able they'd be managing the wolves more aggressively. They're being hampered in this by overwhelming public opinion in favor of the wolves and the possibility of pressure from the Governor's office is also a factor. It was also apparent from talking with him that when they were formulating the plan, they had no idea what they were getting into with regards to the scope and goals of the program, much as we've discussed and speculated on this forum. He urged me to keep from getting personal toward any one member of the WDFW as no one person is responsible for how they're being managed at this point. The information was helpful in getting an overall idea of where the program stands right now. I feel even stringer that the only hope we have to being able to manage the wolves within a reasonable period of time is if westsiders get a taste of the packs.


Interestingly enough this is pretty much what Idahohuntr has been saying all along.   :dunno:    I do quite agree with you that we are going to only see results when wolves start plaguing the west-siders.  I can only hope that day comes quickly (even though I have mixed feelings about it happening). 

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #66 on: October 09, 2014, 06:33:47 AM »
 Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife. 

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44807
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #67 on: October 09, 2014, 06:40:58 AM »
Quote
After speaking with someone very involved with the wolf program, he indicated the the WDFW is doing what they can to manage the wolves in the face of fierce opposition from the pro-wolf groups. He did say that if there were able they'd be managing the wolves more aggressively. They're being hampered in this by overwhelming public opinion in favor of the wolves and the possibility of pressure from the Governor's office is also a factor. It was also apparent from talking with him that when they were formulating the plan, they had no idea what they were getting into with regards to the scope and goals of the program, much as we've discussed and speculated on this forum. He urged me to keep from getting personal toward any one member of the WDFW as no one person is responsible for how they're being managed at this point. The information was helpful in getting an overall idea of where the program stands right now. I feel even stringer that the only hope we have to being able to manage the wolves within a reasonable period of time is if westsiders get a taste of the packs.


Interestingly enough this is pretty much what Idahohuntr has been saying all along.   :dunno:    I do quite agree with you that we are going to only see results when wolves start plaguing the west-siders.  I can only hope that day comes quickly (even though I have mixed feelings about it happening).

Not so much. He's not been saying they designed a plan way over their heads and are paying for their own mistakes. He's been one of their staunchest supporters in this plan. They screwed the pooch on this and the ranchers have to pay for it.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #68 on: October 09, 2014, 06:52:22 AM »
Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife.

Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County. 

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #69 on: October 09, 2014, 07:00:02 AM »
Quote
After speaking with someone very involved with the wolf program, he indicated the the WDFW is doing what they can to manage the wolves in the face of fierce opposition from the pro-wolf groups. He did say that if there were able they'd be managing the wolves more aggressively. They're being hampered in this by overwhelming public opinion in favor of the wolves and the possibility of pressure from the Governor's office is also a factor. It was also apparent from talking with him that when they were formulating the plan, they had no idea what they were getting into with regards to the scope and goals of the program, much as we've discussed and speculated on this forum. He urged me to keep from getting personal toward any one member of the WDFW as no one person is responsible for how they're being managed at this point. The information was helpful in getting an overall idea of where the program stands right now. I feel even stringer that the only hope we have to being able to manage the wolves within a reasonable period of time is if westsiders get a taste of the packs.


Interestingly enough this is pretty much what Idahohuntr has been saying all along.   :dunno:    I do quite agree with you that we are going to only see results when wolves start plaguing the west-siders.  I can only hope that day comes quickly (even though I have mixed feelings about it happening).

Not so much. He's not been saying they designed a plan way over their heads and are paying for their own mistakes. He's been one of their staunchest supporters in this plan. They screwed the pooch on this and the ranchers have to pay for it.

He has been telling you for a long time now that WDFW has its hands tied by the extremist pro wolf side which is effectively what this other individual said. The statements are nearly the same. But hard truth is not what people want in this, they want big bad government agencies so they can affirm their anti government stances.

You wait, if a Clive Bundy style showdown happens it will quickly devolve from wolves to talk about Federal/state land grabs and the issue will get buried. If you think people don't take ranchers seriously on wolves now, just wait.

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44807
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #70 on: October 09, 2014, 07:07:32 AM »
Their hands weren't tied until they caved into the wolf groups instead of setting reasonable goals. They could've listened to the objections and they could've learned from the problems in ID and MT. They didn't. They could have, but they didn't. Now that they have to work with the plan THEY designed, their hands are tied. Big difference.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #71 on: October 09, 2014, 07:10:05 AM »
Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife.

Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County.



You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #72 on: October 09, 2014, 07:12:35 AM »
Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife.

Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County.



You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.

You're absolutely right, it's we the people. Not just the people of Stevens County. Every deer, elk, cougar, wolf, tree, spot of dirt... if it's on government land it belongs to everyone, not just one small population center in the corner of the state. That doesn't make what is happening particularly fair, but the fact remains, the county can enforce rules on county land and that's about it. The good senator just did what any politician does and say what his constituents wanted to hear and make promises that he can't keep or that are unachievable.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2014, 07:20:49 AM by AspenBud »

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #73 on: October 09, 2014, 07:27:23 AM »
Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife.

Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County.



You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.

You're absolutely right, it's we the people. Not just the people of Stevens County.


That's the problem, people from out of state pretty much get a vote on huge problems they have zero incidents/experiences with, ever.

How many real wolves have you seen in Washington, seeing, not seeing scat or hair ?

How many ranchers do you know who's cattle is getting killed by wolves ?
 
How many cops do you know who investigates these wolf kills in Stevens County ?

How many times have you reported wolf sightings and or wolf track pictures to the WDFW ?

Me: 6 wolves
Me: ! ( the biggest cattleman in Stevens County )
Me: 2 cops
ME: at least a dozen times with zero care from WDFW 5 years ago to date.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: WDFW to Hold wolf Meeting Colville
« Reply #74 on: October 09, 2014, 08:13:44 AM »
Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife.

Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County.



You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.

You're absolutely right, it's we the people. Not just the people of Stevens County. Every deer, elk, cougar, wolf, tree, spot of dirt... if it's on government land it belongs to everyone, not just one small population center in the corner of the state. That doesn't make what is happening particularly fair, but the fact remains, the county can enforce rules on county land and that's about it. The good senator just did what any politician does and say what his constituents wanted to hear and make promises that he can't keep or that are unachievable.

When your neighbors dogs comes over and kills all your chickens what do you do?

You've contacted the neighbor about the problem, you've spend out of pocket 100's of dollars upgrading your fence yet the dogs keep coming over.
Now you've caught your neighbor opening the gate and letting the dogs in your yard!

Neighbor says they're just doing what dogs do and tosses you $2.25 to cover the loss of a chicken that one of his dogs are currently mauling...you tell him you've lost over 20 chickens!   the neighbor says wasn't my dogs killed those 20 chickens, must have been a honey badger,  you kindly inform him that it wasn't a freaking honey badger they're in Africa you dum...

Now you get into a fist fight, get arrested for assault and tossed in the slammer while all your chickens get confiscated because the city just rezoned your area to prohibit poultry and livestock of any kind while you were in jail.  When you finally get home the neighbor just acquired a couple of new dogs, and they bark 24/7.





 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by EnglishSetter
[Today at 09:41:07 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by treeclimber2852
[Today at 09:17:15 AM]


3 pintails by hunterednate
[Today at 08:55:58 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by Dan-o
[Today at 08:44:37 AM]


Velvet by Brute
[Today at 08:37:08 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 08:35:05 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by elkaholic123
[Today at 08:32:01 AM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 06:12:44 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by bustedoldman
[Today at 06:10:08 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 05:43:11 AM]


Lizard Cam by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:48:54 AM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by bearpaw
[Today at 12:53:11 AM]


Pocket Carry by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:33:35 PM]


2025 Coyotes by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 06:11:55 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 02:14:23 PM]


2025 Crab! by Stein
[Yesterday at 01:48:55 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Yesterday at 01:04:52 PM]


Price on brass? by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 12:18:54 PM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Yesterday at 09:03:55 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal