collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 43110 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10653
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10653
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 443
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 deer, let's see em! by MADMAX
[Today at 11:54:07 AM]


2024 deer. Let’s see um! by Pathfinder101
[Today at 11:44:49 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by Elkpiss
[Today at 10:44:26 AM]


venison jerky with a dehydrator by baldopepper
[Today at 10:26:16 AM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by bearpaw
[Today at 09:30:07 AM]


Meet Kumpel by metlhead
[Today at 08:16:29 AM]


Summer sausage by brew
[Today at 07:25:25 AM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by hunter399
[Today at 05:24:43 AM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by GeoSwan
[Today at 12:04:28 AM]


LEM SLICER by dylanpurkey25
[Yesterday at 11:41:12 PM]


Muzzleloader scope options by dub870
[Yesterday at 09:29:35 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 07:40:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal